Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

>20X increase in perinatal death rate at funeral home used by UCSF in H2 2022
substack.com ^ | 2/20/2023 | Steve Kirsch

Posted on 02/20/2023 5:35:41 PM PST by ransomnote

The hospitals aren't talking, so I will. I just talked to a funeral home used by UCSF. The funeral home's rates of perinatal deaths were up over 20X above normal in H2 2022.

6 hr ago

Executive summary

Perinatal deaths are defined as fetal deaths (deaths after 20 weeks) and infant deaths (deaths after giving birth). These deaths are typically sent to a funeral home.

I talked with one of the funeral homes used by UCSF. In the last 6 months of 2022, they saw the rates of perinatal death cases jump by a factor of over 20X above normal.

I asked Dr. James Thorp about these numbers and his reaction was, “I’m not surprised.”

The hospitals aren’t talking and the mainstream media isn’t covering this, but I thought you should know.

Should this be shocking? I think so!

As you can see from the chart below, perinatal death rates are remarkably constant over time. Even just a 10% increase would be considered “significant” and be cause for an immediate investigation. So this is 200 times bigger than “significant.”

Products - Data Briefs - Number 429 - January 2022
 
Perinatal death rates have been decreasing in the US. So a 20X rise in late 2022 should be concerning. But not in today’s society. This story will not be covered in any mainstream press anywhere in the world. Ever.

But in today’s society, none of this matters. No matter how high the perinatal death rates increase due to the COVID vaccines, there will be no investigations.

Nobody wants to know the truth. Not the CDC, not the FDA, not Congress, not the mainstream media, and not the doctors. They all want to pretend that none of this is happening. They are looking the other way. “Willful blindness.”

Introduction

Recently, I was referred to a funeral home used by UCSF and Stanford Hospitals. I can’t disclose the name of the funeral home because the person who disclosed this information would be immediately fired. However, the referral to my source came from the head of another funeral home; a person who I have known for a long time.

I can’t cite specific numbers because that would identify the funeral home and get my source fired.

My source mentioned to me that perinatal deaths are extremely rare, but in the second half of 2022, their rates went up by over 20X normal.

That is not normal.

Hospitals aren’t talking. Federal authorities aren’t investigating. The mainstream media isn’t covering this either. Congress isn’t interested in investigating.

Nobody wants anyone to find out that they were wrong to be pushing these vaccines.

Fact checker notice

I’m happy to have a neutral trusted source such as UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad verify that what I said is true. You can then check with him.

Summary

It’s crystal clear that something novel is affecting our birthrates. It is affecting mothers all over the world.

The funeral home used by UCSF I spoke with is just one small example.

Nobody wants to cover this story.

I wonder what could be causing the rise in perinatal deaths worldwide after the vaccines rolled out. The only thing I can think of are the COVID vaccines. Am I missing something?



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: covid; vaccines

1 posted on 02/20/2023 5:35:41 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; bagster; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; ...

PING


2 posted on 02/20/2023 5:36:16 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

In before the infallibe docs here on FR say its bs/anecdotal/whatever excuse they prefer


3 posted on 02/20/2023 5:37:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Ed Dowd’s recent study he discussed on Warroom a few hours ago shows the same trendline for adverse events as the original big pharma studies showed.

The math is not lying, but the media, government, and corporate health care are.


4 posted on 02/20/2023 5:41:41 PM PST by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Looking at the numbers in the posted chart - I don’t 20X anything.

What am I missing?


5 posted on 02/20/2023 5:42:29 PM PST by ASOC (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

where are the same stats for 2020 - 2022?


6 posted on 02/20/2023 6:02:54 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Am I missing something?

Yes, a defination perinatel for the lay person.


7 posted on 02/20/2023 6:08:33 PM PST by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Those 3 years illustrate the official national rates of 2017-2019. He’s saying that the figures he is getting from one (or more) funeral homes for 6 months of 2022 show a rate that is 20x greater.

As a statistical comparison it has definite shortcomings. But even accounting for variations between funeral homes in different parts of the country, the probability that the ones to which he is referring could be the only ones showing that sort of increase is extraordinarily unlikely.


8 posted on 02/20/2023 6:10:37 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ASOC; sten

I’m with you both: Where are the numbers that support the 20X assertion?


9 posted on 02/20/2023 6:12:34 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I don’t know but, nationally the infant mortality rate is declining. Perhaps

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/infant-mortality-rate

Perhaps UCSF is on a massive CAMPAIGN TO MURDER INFANTS? Or perhaps somebody is fibbing to the writer and making crap up? Just sayin’.


10 posted on 02/20/2023 6:21:34 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven Scharf

It is perinatal and meaning is obvious if you go by the roots.


11 posted on 02/20/2023 6:27:30 PM PST by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steven Scharf

Seriously??

Do you not have a built in dictionary (highlight, right click) on your device, or, just lazy??


12 posted on 02/20/2023 6:29:49 PM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy.


13 posted on 02/20/2023 6:37:21 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Fact checker notice
I’m happy to have a neutral trusted source such as UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad verify that what I said is true. You can then check with him.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
I am calling you on that.
Go ahead and get the data. Because all you have in the article is [poof] thin air.
BTW - I have listened to dozens of Dr. Prasad’s podcasts. And I know he isn’t afraid of controversy.
Good luck.


14 posted on 02/20/2023 6:38:13 PM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The experimental mRNA gene therapy is not safe or effective.


15 posted on 02/20/2023 6:49:37 PM PST by bray (Order at TheRepublicofTexas.store)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Departments-and-Agencies/DPH/Vital-Statistics/Death-Counts/Death_Count_2005-2022_v2023-02-02.xlsx

This website has the numbers for deaths within Connecticut by month and year over the past decade (the bottom chart). The state population has not gone up more than a percent or two yet the 2022 deaths appear to be around 10%+ above the pre-Covid 2017-2019 years. If that's a nationwide trend, it's a lot of extra deaths.

To the extent excess deaths are acknowledged by the media, they are portrayed as the result of Covid itself or of diagnoses / care deferred during the pandemic. Of course, if the Covid fatalities occured primarily among the most vulnerable, some of those people who died in 2020-2021 would be gone and not around to die in 2022. So… I don't know how it all balances out but surely it should be a very significant topic for mainstream public discussion. But it is not.

16 posted on 02/20/2023 7:36:05 PM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson