Posted on 01/07/2023 4:37:17 PM PST by george76
Dr Peter McCullough explains that latest analysis shows Myocarditis now running at 25,000 per million and we're still relatively early days.
Pre Covid it was 4 in a million.
When will Congress and the American people listen to global experts at the top of their field.
TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND CASES PER MILLION - in unvaxxed times it was just FOUR PER MILLION
Yes, it most certainly can, and did, ending with a question mark.
You obviously have no answers, and are only here to smear McCollough despite having no actual data in your favor.
Thanks for posting. Been looking for a study like this
You deflected that one , too.
The issue was the markup. The manufacturer of Epi-Pens jacked up the price of them for no other reason that to skim a profit off people who had no choice about buying a literally life saving medicine,
The patent on those has expired and since generics are now available to be manufactured, the price, in theory, should be coming down.
But it’s not. Big pharma is still screwing people over financially for a life saving, non-patented medicine.
Your condemnation of Dr. McCullough falls very flat in the face of the known, wide spread price gouging big pharma engages in on a habitual basis.
“You obviously have no answers, and are only here to smear McCollough despite having no actual data in your favor.”
Do you dispute that he promotes and sells high priced fake cures?
EpiPens save lives and work as advertised.
The doctor sells fake cures.
“Your condemnation of Dr. McCullough falls very flat in the face of the known, wide spread price gouging big pharma engages in on a habitual basis.”
And on that basis you justify his ripping people off with high-priced fake cures.
Oh tell the truth. You misquoted the article. You forgot the most important line. Shame on you. Just o show you what a hack you are “overall myocarditis presents a minority cardiomyopathies and heart failure…”. You have cherry picked a subset of a subset. And if you want to really be honest other literature states the overwhelming number of acute myocardities particularly those related to acute viral infection are SELF LIMITED and recovery is without sequelae. Is it that you don’t actually read the totality of the article or that you don’t understand it?
I did swing medical school a while back. Did very well in jr as a matter of fact. The sad experience really is sitting throwing false accusations that are ridiculous on their face and using literature to proof a point that says relatively the opposite of what you said. I sure as hell hope as an astronaut you are not the guy in command.
And yet you blindly worship him as an anonymous poster on the same website. Remember this is the so called expert cardiologist who walked back is comments on the ball player once he inadvertently told the truth. The only credibility he has is with Malone, tenpenny and the liberal non-clinical kirsch. Hell of a following for a guy who has been spouting bull crap for two years. You think he would not be marginalized if he had the right answer.
Epipen Jr 2-Pak Coupons & Prices
(Epinephrine)
Epipen Jr 2-Pak is a Anaphylaxis Therapy Agents class medication created by MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P.. The normal out-of-pocket price of Epipen Jr 2-Pak is $764.05 per 2, 0.15MG/0.3ML Solution Auto-injector, but you can pay just $186.06 for 2, 0.15mg/0.3ml Solution Auto-Injector of generic Epipen Jr 2-Pak with your SingleCare card to access the generic Epipen Jr 2-Pak coupon. Epipen Jr 2-Pak is a trademarked medicine, Epinephrine (Anaphylaxis) is the generic form of Epipen Jr 2-Pak.
I'm not the accuser, you are. So where's your proof he's guilty of something?
In the US, people are innocent until proven guilty.
“I’m not the accuser, you are. So where’s your proof he’s guilty of something?”
https://www.twc.health/products/long-haul-formula
LOl! Answer the question!
“In the US, people are innocent until proven guilty.”
Nope. They are PRESUMED innocent in the court of law until judged guilty.
Democrats are innocent until proven guilty.
Republicans not so much.
Why should I answer any of your questions, when you have avoided the very basic ones I gave you, first. Your questions are clearly just a diversionary tactic, designed to obscure the fact that you have no factual basis for your accusations.
Show us the proof of your accusations, just as McCollough has presented hard, scientific support of his own.
Apparently you can’t. Therefore, McCollough’s accusations are clearly the most sound, supportable, believable, and reliable, compared to yours. Yours are just, uh, something like a jealous rant, I guess? “Weak and unsupported” I guess is more fair.
All depends on how many people you know.
I showed me the odds of my experienced, you provided none for yours .
They have lied to you, you wish to believe them feel free
OK fine, be as technical as you like. That's what we're trying to get you to do here, to pony up some actual facts, instead of just whine about some rich guy you can't stand because the high demand and low supply for his products results in a high selling price.
And the fine Governor of Florida has requested the Supreme Court of Florida stand up a grand jury, to investigate possible crimes committed by the vaccine companies, and government agencies who were involved as well.
Is that the type of "court of law" you are referring to?
Or how about many of the other courts, nationwide, that have ruled in favor of plaintiffs suing against vaccine mandates and the like.
Are those the types of courts of law you were referring to, as well?
So, to try to put your side of the argument forward, what courts of law are actually investigating, have charged, or are planning to charge, or more importantly have ruled in favor of any plaintiffs with regard to Dr. McCollough's products?
I don't know of any, so the assumption is there are none, unless you have some, which I highly doubt.
All depends on how many people you know.
I showed me the odds of my experienced, you provided none for yours .
They have lied to you, you wish to believe them feel free.
Let’s use the same math shall we..
I’d you know 200 people and they are honest about their rates of myocarditis
Then that would mean there is a 1 in 65 chance you would know someone with it.
That means 64 out of 65 people who know 200 poeple would not know anyone who got myocarditis.
Reality if the incident rates were as high as 1 in 400 before you would have a 50% odds of knowing someone who got it… so yes you aren’t lucky to know no one who has it.. odds are even at a rate way higher than their claimed rate you would still statistically more likely not to know someone who got it.
Published rate is 1 in 13,000.. rate could be as high as 1 in 400 and odds would still be in your favor that you know no one.
For me to know 4 as I showed, if they are being honest about their published incident rates, which they aren’t, would be 1 in 17,850,625.
So you aren’t lucky that you know no one, even if rates turn out to be more than 32 times higher than admitted to
https://www.twc.health/products/long-haul-formula
That's your "proof" that McCollough is guilty of something?
ROFL!
What is that anyway? I didn't even see McCollough's name. Are you saying that site is so dangerous the FBI should be shutting it down or something?
Was that post even meant for me? LOL I guess it was, as you pasted my question right before that strange link, where's bears no relevance to this discussion, that I can tell.
Hopefully you will finally produce SOMETHING of value, but so far, NADA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.