Posted on 12/16/2022 7:20:31 PM PST by NetAddicted
That is a nasty list of illnesses you have or are suffering from. If you have not yet considered natural means of healing, now might be a good time to look. You can Google “food, nutrition and supplements to heal ___________”. Put your condition/illness of concern on the dotted line. You can then see if certain foods or supplements appear on most of these conditions. I have been studying cancer as in the past 3 years my son, brother, and partner have or are currently under treatment for an unusual neck cancer, colon cancer, and prostate cancer. I recently read a study of nine different cancers which included colon and prostate which determined that cancer cells are quite deficient in ZINC, even when adjacent health cells are well supplied with ZINC. Zinc also seems important for stopping Covid and other virus illnesses, but needs help from an IONOPHORE like HCQ, Ivermectin, Quercetin or ECGC to help the Zinc into the infected cells. A different ionophore was suggested for study in that cancer study of zinc cell contents. I don;t know if any research like that is being done anywhere on any of the known ionophores, like those I listed here.
Eighty years ago my very progressive female doctor was prescribing cod liver oil, daily for my better health. I remember by mother giving it to me. Last year encountered the study linked below. Even if you don’t want to wade through the long scientific information, be wure to reade the DISCUSSION and CONCLUSIONS near the end. For me the most important finding was that NONE of their hospitalized subjects had OPTIMUM Vitamin D levels. So it seems getting OPTIMUM Vitamin D levels helps keep people out of hospitals. You can get your blood tested and evaluated for Vitamin D.
Don't be recockulous. How could the poison vax NOT enter the blood stream? And once introduced via transfusion, how could it NOT pose a safety risk to the recipient? After all, look at all the 'safety risks' the vax poses for it's recipients.
Mickety, you simply got to stop listening to deep state organizations like the Red Cross. Best you listen to people like me and Grey Whiskers. You'll be better off in the long run.
#MicketyMacGungFu
That has to be dumbest thing in this entire vax universe yet. Do you believe the Red Cross?
#ThePeopleYouTrustTheMost
You are losing it.
You are recognized as a vax shill.
I was never owned by you.
I don’t understand the relevance of your post, and true to form you don’t answer the question.
Done with you TROLL.
Yeah….that time when CDC actually refused “vax” blood….
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kKJDrj8y8ALg/
“Professeur Didier Raoult released the first successful protocol to combat COVID-19, long before Dr Zelenko farted out Raoult’s treatment as his own plus “vitamins”.” and
“Raoult Protocol, March 2020: “A treatment with the combination of...” HCQ and Azithromycin. [I deleted the dose details for simplicity.]
First of all there was no need to insult the late Dr. Zelenko, a sincere doctor with only one lung, who did a lot of early research trying to find a good treatment for Covid. Second he did NOT “fart” out his 3 part protocol for Covid treatment “long” after Raoult’s March 2020 release of his Treatment with HCq and Azithromycin. Dr. Zelenko sent his letter to physicians with cc to Trump and Mark Meadows on March 23,2020, the same month as Dr. Raoult. Zelenko’s addition was not a “Vitamin” it was the virus stopping “mineral” ZINC. He also pointed out that the ionophore HCQ helped zinc enter Covid infected cells more easily. He also contacted Dr. Raoult about adding ZINC to the treatment. this info was favorably received by Raoult. It was also suggested that since a lot of Raoult’s research was conducted in seaport Marsailes (sp?) the general diet may have been high in zinc from seafood in the diet. Raoult understood this suggestion. Dr. Zelenko stated early on that he developed his protocol from research in South Korea and France and offered to provide links to those who asked. The following link may be of interest to you and those who care about the research of these two men.
The results of this trial were very supportive of all 5 items used in the study. See DISCUSSION and CONCLUSIONS at the end of this paper for quick information about the results.
The Red Cross has been pushing to allow homosexuals to donate blood too.
Swampies gonna Swamp.
Notice how you trolls
a) ALWAYS move the goalposts?
b) NEVER admit you've been continuously wrong in the past?
Get stuffed.
1. You are confusing ECMO as a treatment versus ECMO as a modality for surgery. You do realize you have to stop the beer heart to fix a structural abnormality. So when this child had repair of his double outlet right ventricle you see seer he was put on cardiopulmonary bypass aka ECMO. The heart was stopped with a high potassium concentration via infusion through the corners Ostia of the aortic valve and retrograde by way of the venous sinus. You cite information on ecmo for treatment. Which ironically was something early in COVID the antivaxxers were screaming as a treatment. I agree ecmo for ards is the longest of shots.
2. Blood transfusions have also had risks beyond just 40 years ago. Major histocompatibility issues have always been the most feared but minor issues related to antibodies screens beyond rh factor can be equally as detrimental in the long run.
3. I imagine with the changing clinical scenario which in the postoperative phase would have developed the parents consented. Additionally when one consents to surgery one consents to all treatments that are required as a result of the procedure. Certainly one can opt out of transfusion and I am more than certain that the parents ultimately consented
All you have demonstrated here is that it must look good from the cheap seats. Your total lack of understanding that extracorporeal membranous oxygenation ( literally out of body oxygenation) is required for any heart surgery except for OPCAB which was certainly exciting but not out of vogue demonstrates the illiteracy of medicine that most people have but pronounce their absolute understanding of what is going on relative to vaccinations.
Your attempt to show you know what you are talking about has boomeranged. To be clear are you saying that ECMO is not required for cardiac surgery and that it is not safe. That is what you said in paragraph one. Are you sure you want to stick by that answer?
This is my answer to your questions. You do not know what you are talking about as is often the case when someone tries tries to contextualize an issue in which the have no understanding.
Please be more concise in the future, old timey doctor. ThankQ.
I remember reading the doctors scratching their heads over why all KINDS of things weren't working, long before (anyone not in the conspiracy) knew about the jabs.
Moderna in particular had been crying that they couldn't get any tests approved for their RNA shots because they were "experimental gene therapy" -- not by "anti-vaxxers" as you like to slander, but by the FDA. Page 70 or so of their July 2020 FEC filing.
Nothing a little EUA couldn't fix. Ka-ching.
In the meantime, the doctors finally realized it was that COVID-1984 destroyed the ability of the blood to carry oxygen as well as it used to; it wasn't primarily a lung dysfunction after all.
But that leaves unanswered why you $hot $hill$ continued to pretend Ivermection was merely horse paste.
https://gab.com/RedPedePolitics/posts/109517366904520282
THEY KNEW: Dr. Chris Shoemaker shows how DARPA recommended IVERMECTIN for Coronavirus to the CDC following a 15 years study ending in 2015.
Yeah. 4 years BEFORE COVID-1984.
Troll.
Over a year ago I ran into some kind of warning about the kind of anti-coagulant to use for people with problems related to Covid. I don’t remember the details or the reference, but I think it was the use of heparin that was the concern. Some other kind was recommended.
I vaguely remember that too; I think it was when they were comparing COVID coagulation to the more often seen (at least at first) DVT following, say, hip or knee surgery, or extended hospital bed stays, or both.
I recently saw a discussion about the issue of vaccine entering the blood stream. It was suggested that occasionally the needle might enter a blood vessel when the shot was being given. For protection against that possibility it was suggested the plunger should be withdrawn a little to see if any blood comes back into the syringe. If so then the shot should be stopped and reapplied in another spot for safety.
Ha ha ha Qtard gibberish ha ha.
Better find us a weaponized autistical kid to decode it for us.
Us? Not everybody's a brain addled, tweeker, cow tipping hillbilly. Many people are fluent in Ingles, which is how my people say English.
Stick with me, kid. I'll help you along.
It would help if we could understand all you have written. For example what is: line 1) “beer heart”, line 2) “see seer”, line 3) “screaming” and “ards”.
Yes, blood transfusions have always been risky, especially when the blood is being bought by paying people in difficulty money to give up their blood. How healthy is that kind of blood? The parents did consent to the procedure, after the approval of their unvaxed donor was delayed until the infant was at severe risk of death with more delay.
Over 60 years ago I was in charge of maintaining and cleaning the heart/lung machine we used for open heart surgery on dogs at NIH. This was the basic research on Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, and drugs and their effect on these dog’s hearts and heart rhythm. They were not restored to life after the surgery. I am not aware of any new nonECMO way of managing the blood circulation during open heart surgery. Any time the blood is removed from the body and contained in something else there is risk involved. Pristine sanitation at all stages in starting, maintaining, and stopping ECMO is mandatory. What is OPCAB?
I saw that awhile back too ; I think it was a Dr. Campbell presenting, when I saw it.
I have seen other commentary that it doesn’t matter, simply because muscle is very highly perfused, and injecting into the muscle is bound to introduce a lot of microlipid containing the MRNA, directly into the bloodstream anyway.
...of course, it might be that the initial immediate amount into the blood matters too.
See seer is what you say when you're lecturing your favorite epidemiologist for predicting a worldwide catastrophe over COVID-1984 which never materializes, but missing the harm from the clot shots.
Screaming is what $hot $hill$ do when each new scientific paper or news story about harms from the clot shots come out.
Ards is acute respiratory distress syndrome: the thing they tried to use ventilators on but that failed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.