Would this also cause the removal of any federal judges nominated and confirmed
Never ever ever ever ever ever ever gonna happen. Period. Full stop. Quit hoping for unicorn farts and fairy kisses.
Aren’t the people of Brazil kind of going the same route?
Sweet! But the damage is already done.
Heaven, please help us! 🌲
Good for them for at least trying. They deserve more credit than those who just vent on social media about 2020.
Not this sh*t again. All that has happened is that this petition for certiorari has been submitted by the petitioners and dutifully filed and docketed by the Clerk of the Supreme Court . . . as the Clerk will always do for any petition that meets the Court's bare minimum standards for formatting, etc.
The petition is now scheduled to go to Conference on January 6, 2023, where, yes, it will be "considered" by the Justices, to see if they wish to take up the case. That is to say, the petition will be handled just as every single cert. petition that ever gets filed -- including those written out, long-hand, by jail house lawyers on lined paper who are allowed to proceed in forma pauperis -- gets handled.
In short, there is nothing whatsoever that is "astounding" here. The petition will surely be very quickly denied by the Court following the Conference next month, and that'll be the end of that.
You know, if people just had some understanding of how things actually work, they wouldn't be forever getting their panties in a bunch whenever some shyster charlatan spits out another bogus story like this. Wise up yourselves.
It’s too good to believe that 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators could be removed from office for nonfeasance of constitutional duties, but it would be awesome if it were to happen.
I read about this case the other day.
The article I read stated that this was about SCOTUS affirming the the legislature make the rules, not the courts.
I guess, one could argue that if the NC Legislature wins, then the Republicans in Pennsylvania could make a case that they, not the Pa Supreme Ct nor the SecState, makes the rules and all those ballots would be tossed. Stretch, but one that can be attempted, I’m guessing.
But, from some of the attached citations I read, the language is pretty clear that the legislature makes the rules and the courts have no say in anything.
We’ll see.
“The case of Brunson v. Adams” must be taken and will be taken by the Courts, since it is 100% solid and easy to close. Very simple to see how the Brunson v. Adams case can easily clean up damage and punish traitors. Good news: Guantanamo Bay sees new construction after prison ordered shut by failures in DC.
Shouldn’t and wouldn’t be requiring such a dramatic case except for the Supremes having turned down multiple legit opportunities to intervene far earlier.
This one to me is suspiciously way too easy for them to turn down now, despite the underlying merits.
>>Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election<<
Forget what you just read.
Hope it happens, but don’t hold your breath for it to happen.
Is there even a provision in the Constitution to reverse an election even if it is proven to be crooked?
We never had an invalid election because we never had a Brandon.
FAKE NEWS!! They are NOT considering this as much as I WISH they would!
First time I have heard about this case.
About one month ago, I started making the case at Free Republic that it is legally impossible to certify a federal election before proving - beyond a reasonable doubt - that the election was fair and honest.
I raised this issue in the context of criminal charges against at least 360 January 6th demonstrators who have been charged with obstructing a Congressional procedure, which carries up to a 20 year prison sentence.
Trump lost the 2020 election by 43,000 votes spread across three states - WI, GA, and AZ.
How many ineligible people voted in those three states?
Unknown.
How many ballots in those three states have no verifiable chain of custody?
Unknown.
I cannot prove that Donald Trump won the election.
But, Congress cannot prove that Donald Trump lost the election.
Congressional certification is not legally possible.
ALL obstruction charges against the January 6th demonstrators must be dropped!
Article I - Section 5
"Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members..."
If only Gateway Pundit was at least 10% right. Everytime I see it’s from Gateway Pundit I just shake my head......
More likely the court will just hold this case like a cocked gun until the new Congress is installed.
Interesting now that many things have come to light.