First time I have heard about this case.
About one month ago, I started making the case at Free Republic that it is legally impossible to certify a federal election before proving - beyond a reasonable doubt - that the election was fair and honest.
I raised this issue in the context of criminal charges against at least 360 January 6th demonstrators who have been charged with obstructing a Congressional procedure, which carries up to a 20 year prison sentence.
Trump lost the 2020 election by 43,000 votes spread across three states - WI, GA, and AZ.
How many ineligible people voted in those three states?
Unknown.
How many ballots in those three states have no verifiable chain of custody?
Unknown.
I cannot prove that Donald Trump won the election.
But, Congress cannot prove that Donald Trump lost the election.
Congressional certification is not legally possible.
ALL obstruction charges against the January 6th demonstrators must be dropped!
By your standard there’s never been a certifiable presidential election.
See my No. 22. All well and good in theory. “Charges must be dropped”? The feds don’t think so, and the charges WON’T be dropped. They’ll continue to hold these political prisoners. That’s my point with this BS litigation, and your theory. My dog is just as likely to make me scrambled eggs this morning, as either of those having the desired result. Period. So why do we go down these rabbit holes?