Skip to comments.
Earth Is An Oil-Producing Machine — We're Not Running Out: Fossil Fuels is a misnomer. Research from the last decade found that hydrocarbons are synthesized abiotically.
Investors Business Daily ^
| 11/04/2015
| Kerry Jackson
Posted on 12/10/2022 9:48:38 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Ever since M. King Hubbert in the 1950s convinced a lot of people with his "peak oil" theory that production would collapse and we'd eventually exhaust our crude supplies, the clock has been running. And running. And it will continue to run for some time, as technology and new discoveries show that there's still an ocean of oil under our feet.
Engineering and Technology Magazine reported this week that BP — the company that once wanted to be known as "Beyond Petroleum" rather than "British Petroleum" — is saying "the world is no longer at risk of running out of resources."
"Thanks to investment into supercomputers, robotics and the use of chemicals to extract the maximum from available reservoirs, the accessible oil and gas reserves will almost double by 2050," Engineering and Technology said.
A BP official told the magazine that "energy resources are plentiful. Concerns over running out of oil and gas have disappeared."
Things are so good, in fact, that Engineering and Technology says "with the use of the innovative technologies, available fossil fuel resources could increase from the current 2.9 trillion barrels of oil equivalent to 4.8 trillion by 2050, which is almost twice as much as the projected global demand." That number could even reach 7.5 trillion barrels if technology and exploration techniques advance even faster.
This information backs up the idea that Earth is actually an oil-producing machine. We call energy sources such as crude oil and natural gas fossil fuels based on the assumption that they are the products of decaying organisms, maybe even dinosaurs themselves. But the label is a misnomer. Research from the last decade found that hydrocarbons are synthesized abiotically.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: abiogenic; abiogenichydrocarbon; abiotic; abioticoil; carbon13; cryptobiology; cryptozoology; darklife; deeplife; ecoterrorism; ecoterrorists; energy; extremophiles; fossilfuels; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; oil; renewable; thomasgold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Governor Dinwiddie
The outer layers of the planet’s interior. It is a very big volume packed with lots of elements. Carbon did not originate on the surface. It was present throughout the mass.
41
posted on
12/11/2022 6:37:45 AM PST
by
GingisK
To: DesertRhino
I think it is fully retarded to think the crude that deep in the ground came from dinosaurs congregating on the surface, and then draining into the lower depths.
42
posted on
12/11/2022 6:39:17 AM PST
by
GingisK
To: UnwashedPeasant
The Russians said this decades ago.
43
posted on
12/11/2022 6:40:26 AM PST
by
GingisK
To: SeekAndFind
44
posted on
12/11/2022 6:48:59 AM PST
by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
To: dsrtsage
It’s a byproduct from the Earth’s core
To: SeekAndFind
The production of hydrocarbons is meaningless. The ONLY question with whether fossil fuels are really from prehistoric life is where is the carbon coming from. To be clear: Producing hydrocarbons out of carbon does increase the amount of energy that can be extracted; that’s why natural gas is “greener” than coal. But if the hydrocarbons are made from coal, they are still fossil fuels.
46
posted on
12/11/2022 6:54:06 AM PST
by
dangus
To: GingisK
Yes, but it seems like the IBD writer is confused into supposing that the Nature article has anything at all to do with what the Russians claimed.
47
posted on
12/11/2022 6:55:27 AM PST
by
dangus
To: GingisK
>> I think it is fully retarded to think the crude that deep in the ground came from dinosaurs congregating on the surface, and then draining into the lower depths. <<
Dinocorp cartoons aside, fossil fuels have 0.0000001% to do with dinosaurs, and absolutely 0% to do with anything “congregating” on the surface. When you have such an absolute knowledge of what you’re talking about, it’s retarded to call people who have studied this their entire lives (not me) “retarded.” The world is full of places where plant matter is in the process of being converted into coal, even though for many reasons, this happened chiefly during a single epoch.
48
posted on
12/11/2022 6:59:36 AM PST
by
dangus
To: SeekAndFind
Ever since I first heard the term “fossil fuel” in the 5th grade, I knew it was BS.
There is no such a thing as a fossil fuel
49
posted on
12/11/2022 7:01:17 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(And the people said NO! The End)
To: logi_cal869
Did we have the same teacher?
50
posted on
12/11/2022 7:02:19 AM PST
by
joe fonebone
(And the people said NO! The End)
To: SeekAndFind
Wow, I’m amazed that there are still scientists around allowed to talk like this.
51
posted on
12/11/2022 7:11:47 AM PST
by
TalBlack
(We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
To: SeekAndFind
MORE FROM THIS SOURCE — NATURE:I see the researchers were from Woods Hole Oceanographic, a group which had previously been investigating abiogenic origins of oil in other locations.
52
posted on
12/11/2022 7:22:22 AM PST
by
fso301
To: SeekAndFind
We didn’t land on the moon either...
53
posted on
12/11/2022 7:23:36 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(If OLD twitter management had stood up to Homeland & FBI goons they's be hurt 7 ways from Sunday)
To: SeekAndFind
This research is racist and homophobic and must be stopped immediately. For the sake of the children. And Mother Earth!
To: SeekAndFind
This doesn’t address the question of why they want to kill us anyway.
55
posted on
12/11/2022 8:12:59 AM PST
by
Salman
(It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along. )
To: joe fonebone
If “fossil fuel” was real, then dinosaurs roamed the deep ocean floors where oil is constantly being discovered.
Or does oil originate from fossilized sharks?
As someone whose first job was with a global oil research company, “fossil fuels” is a hoax.
56
posted on
12/11/2022 8:22:13 AM PST
by
newfreep
("There is no race problem...just a problem race")
To: SeekAndFind
Gee, I guess that moves petroleum in the “renewable resource” column.
57
posted on
12/11/2022 8:34:21 AM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
To: muir_redwoods
As a huge fan of carbon, this is wonderful news!
58
posted on
12/11/2022 8:35:51 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(Let's go Brandon!)
To: DesertRhino
It’s semi retarded to decide that oil and gas can only be formed from dinosaurs.And it approaches super semi retarded to conclude dinosaurs existed in numbers sufficient to form roughly 80m barrels of oil/day (worldwide crude oil production).
59
posted on
12/11/2022 8:36:51 AM PST
by
Ahithophel
(Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
To: SeekAndFind
The big question now is: will fracking chemicals kill the continued oil production?
60
posted on
12/11/2022 8:38:19 AM PST
by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson