Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2022 11:56:29 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: bitt

Yeah, that gentle guidance of threatening jail or career loss.


2 posted on 11/20/2022 11:57:45 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐Public hangings will wake 'em up.⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Didn’t several doctors lose their license for prescribing it?


3 posted on 11/20/2022 11:59:18 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

For being a recommendation, health care and governmental organizations sure came down hard on physicians trying to prescribe it.

Recommendation not to use it, my ass.


4 posted on 11/20/2022 11:59:36 AM PST by rlmorel (Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Govt is arguing total bs

Typical


5 posted on 11/20/2022 12:00:18 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

“yeah, that’s the ticket!”

Jon Lovitz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLRKhdQnd-k


6 posted on 11/20/2022 12:00:38 PM PST by bitt ( <IMG SRC=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The agencies that perform surveys take those recommendations as gospel. And the hospitals and clinics live in fear of surveys.

It would be interesting to see how many deficiencies were issued for failing to follow FDA/NDH/CDC guidance.

And regardless of whether deficiencies were issued, some protective laws that protects providers if they deviate from guidance would be helpful.


7 posted on 11/20/2022 12:01:32 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The agencies that perform surveys take those recommendations as gospel. And the hospitals and clinics live in fear of surveys.

It would be interesting to see how many deficiencies were issued for failing to follow FDA/NDH/CDC guidance.

And regardless of whether deficiencies were issued, some protective laws that protects providers if they deviate from guidance would be helpful.


8 posted on 11/20/2022 12:01:32 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

The agencies that perform surveys take those recommendations as gospel. And the hospitals and clinics live in fear of surveys.

It would be interesting to see how many deficiencies were issued for failing to follow FDA/NDH/CDC guidance.

And regardless of whether deficiencies were issued, some protective laws that protects providers if they deviate from guidance would be helpful.


9 posted on 11/20/2022 12:01:33 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

lies lies and more lies.... docs could not prescribe and drugists could not fill prescriptions


10 posted on 11/20/2022 12:02:31 PM PST by DOC44 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

This is some kind of B.S. attempt to rewrite history.


11 posted on 11/20/2022 12:02:48 PM PST by Flick Lives (Cui bono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

For all intents and purposes this Lawyer just LIED TO THE COURT and should be Jailed for Contempt then disbarred. Unfortunately it would take a Judge that actually Read and Understood the Oath they took


12 posted on 11/20/2022 12:03:17 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Dearest FDA


14 posted on 11/20/2022 12:06:47 PM PST by HippyLoggerBiker (Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite and furthermore always carry a small snake. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

I know 5 people that used it. All of them better by the morning of the 3rd day, oddly enough.

One of them had access to free testing. Get tested and was negative.

One person said that they could not remember feeling better than they did after getting on Ivermectin.

Hospitals didn’t want it because they wouldn’t have been able to murder folks and make all that money.


15 posted on 11/20/2022 12:06:50 PM PST by qaz123 (F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Horse Hockey. Doctor’s, and others were targeted, verbally attacked, cancelled, threatened to have their licenses taken away for promoting the use of Ivermectin, even arrested and sent to jail for entering the Capitol Building on January 6th, a building that is owned by the American People, not just the Congress Critters who occupy it with our permission. This is more of the “we need to move on” bullshite being shoved down our throats.


16 posted on 11/20/2022 12:07:52 PM PST by mass55th ("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

BS.

Almost all local health and medico officials turned it into The Law [Follow The Science!; Fauxcy IS Science!].

With rapacious teeth.


18 posted on 11/20/2022 12:11:23 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Horse hockey puck paste...


19 posted on 11/20/2022 12:12:06 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Families in Chicagoland and elsewhere had to hire attorneys to enable hospitalized family members to be able to take Ivermectin.

Rewriting history as we watch....


21 posted on 11/20/2022 12:15:27 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Except that the “guidance” they sent out nationwide had pharmacists afraid to fill prescriptions for the few fearless doctors who tried.


25 posted on 11/20/2022 12:31:19 PM PST by Pollard ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Q fir the FDA’s legal eagle: Then why wasn’t ivermectin considered a covered countermeasure, eh?

Because if there were therapeutics, then no EUA...?


26 posted on 11/20/2022 12:33:12 PM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

“The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations.” ... “They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”

I AM FURIOUS!!! I DESPISE these people! How many Americans died because of the “NOT directives”?


28 posted on 11/20/2022 12:35:47 PM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson