Posted on 11/20/2022 11:56:29 AM PST by bitt
Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic, is approved by the federal government but not in treatment for COVID-19.
attorney for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration argued that the agency's guidance against taking ivermectin for COVID was "not mandatory" and a recommendation.
"The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do," lawyer Isaac Belfer said during a federal court hearing in Texas earlier this month, The Epoch Times reported. "They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin."
The hearing came in a case brought by three doctors who argued that the FDA's statements on ivermectin illegally interfered with their ability to prescribe drugs.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
Families in Chicagoland and elsewhere had to hire attorneys to enable hospitalized family members to be able to take Ivermectin.
Rewriting history as we watch....
All you have to do is look at the deaths in Nigeria…..they take it for malaria
Two of my doctors took early retirement earlier this year. I’ve suspected that they didn’t like what was going on.
I laugh just thinking about Lovitz.
Except that the “guidance” they sent out nationwide had pharmacists afraid to fill prescriptions for the few fearless doctors who tried.
Q fir the FDA’s legal eagle: Then why wasn’t ivermectin considered a covered countermeasure, eh?
Because if there were therapeutics, then no EUA...?
It wasn’t just the so-called guidance.
Because ivermectin wasn’t a covered countermeasure no liability protection accrued to its use.
Deep State had a great way to control Big Med.
And Big Med knuckled under, patients bedamned.
“The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations.” ... “They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”
I AM FURIOUS!!! I DESPISE these people! How many Americans died because of the “NOT directives”?
Doctors would not prescribe it. Pharmacists would not fill prescriptions if you managed to get one. You were reduced to buying it configured for horses.
But that was all just a suggestion.
This crap is just so disingenuous. If the ‘recommendation’ had no effect why did they peddle it to the medical profession? They did it because of the aura it created, knowing it would be used as an excuse by the medical lap dogs to not issue or fill prescriptions. Then too there are the licensing boards that view the FDA as the high priest, dictating medical practice.
“One person said that they could not remember feeling better than they did after getting on Ivermectin.”
That’s how it was for me. Over the years how many icky things accumulate in a person’s body? Ivermectin seemed to find and fix every bad thing.
Make it six.
IVM works
Make it six.
IVM works
https://www.linkedin.com/in/isaac-belfer-3903b813a
ultra lefty imo
protecting consumers???roflmao
Consumer Protection Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice
Trial Attorney
EXACTLY!!!!
Awesome to hear.
And let us not forget about Judith Smentkiewicz, whose family saved her life because they sued the hospital she was dying in, twice.
Total un-mitigated bullshit!
Yeah. Even if you could get a doctor to prescribe it(few would), most pharmacies refused to fill orders for it. FDA and CDC have a lot of blood on their hands.
More lies from the Communist Democratic Cult.
The Great Reset : fixing all the previous lies with new ones.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.