Having multiple sexual partners does NOT affect your marriage chances in the long-term, study finds

UK Daily Mail ^ | November 15, 2022 | Xantha Leatham

[C19fan]

If you're looking for love but are plagued by a promiscuous past, fear not.

Having multiple sexual partners does not affect your marriage chances in the long-term, a study suggests.

Instead, the effects of promiscuity on marriage rates is 'seasonal' and the number of sexual partners accrued over a lifetime does not appear to have an impact, scientists say.

[C19fan]

I am not sure if the reporter or the researchers can read a chart? It shows a woman with 1 non-martial partner has a 90% chance of being married by age 35. For 304s, that rate drops to 60%. That does seem permanent to me. The academics who did this research cannot say the truth without the feminists coming down their throats? There is this caveat "by reported number of non-marital sex partners". What is the rule of thumb for women, take the "reported" number and multiply by 5? Men it is take the reported number and divide by a factor. There is evidence that indicates number of "partners" is inversely correlated with marriage success. As the saying goes, you cannot turn a 304 into a housewife.

[Lazamataz]

without the feminists coming down their throats?

[C19fan]

Good one although never watched one second of that show.

[SauronOfMordor]

I agree, the headline does NOT match the reported data.

[ClearCase_guy]

Getting married in the first place is one issue.
Staying married is another issue.

I’m guessing that a tendency to promiscuity may have a negative impact on that second point.

[RoosterRedux]

Just a thought, but I’ll bet the chances of “getting” married are quite different than the chances of having a happy, productive, and satisfying marriage.

[Jonty30]

Anything more than ten partners, and the willingness to divorce is about 100% on part of the woman. That’s a statistical fact.

Women say they don’t compare past lovers, but their ability to remain happy in a stable relationships approaches zero as the woman has more partners.

[NorthMountain]

Gentlemen: Only ever ‘do it’ with your wife.

Ladies: Only ever ‘do it’ with your husband.

Everybody: Don’t marry a garden tool.

[NorseViking]

Does it cover multiple partners after marriage?

[Guenevere]

Keep telling yourself that!

I’ll stick with what my parents and the Bible instructed….
….a marriage relationship is built on trust.
Stay pure for your potential husband

A person certainly can be forgiven for sex outside of marriage….
..forgiven, but there may be consequences

….but a carte blanche attitude is something else

My 2 cents

[RoosterRedux]

Does it cover multiple partners after marriage?

Yes...with a slight change in the headlines:

Having multiple sexual partners after marriage does NOT affect your chances of divorce in the long-term

[Buttons12]

I’m a millennial. Well more than half of everyone I know in my age group, have no interest whatsoever in getting married. They sincerely believe it’s unnecessary. They have partners. They have kids. Many have three or more kids and I know men who have six or more, and never married any of the mothers. And of course many are gay and very, very few of them think marriage is anything but a dead end.
Conservatives, traditionalists, and religious folks are a dying breed. They marry.
But most...just don’t care. And I’m writing from Redneck, PA. Imagine it’s worse in the urban jungles.

[NorseViking]

Haha:)

[real saxophonist]

I literally laughed my ass off.

[real saxophonist]

You should. You will literally laugh your ass off.

[2nd Amendment]

Unrepentant it does increase your chance of going to hell

[C19fan]

I know in my age group, have no interest whatsoever in getting married. They sincerely believe it’s unnecessary.

Respect those people more than people who get married to be the center of attention for a few weeks, to say they are "married", and end up going to divorce court out of boredom.

[Jonty30]

Which is really unfortunate.
What women do not understand, I mean for most and not all, is that morality exists for their sake and less so for the men.

In a predatory world, the strong man is king and can do what he wants. In a moral world, the strong man must exercise restraint for the sake of others and not for himself.

When women bought into the feminist viewpoint on sexuality, they did not understand how it was going to hurt them. Now, they have to hurt themselves sexually in order to even have a man available in their life.

[cranked]

Confirmed: This world full of stupid.

[KC_Conspirator]

What kind of idiot looks at that chart and can't discern that being a 304 means you have a 30% less chance of getting married? Wtf?

A bigger point about about being 304 is ones success in marriage, in which if you are a 304 your chances of divorce and unhappiness because you cant pair bond skyrocket.

General rule is x3 for women. They dont count things like the hawt guy she met at the foam cannon party in Cancun who raw dogged her only after knowing him for an hour.