Posted on 11/10/2022 2:25:26 PM PST by ransomnote
[H/T CheshireTheCat]
Covid “vaccines” cause myocarditis and pericarditis but Covid infections do not. Huge 500k+ participant study.
We were lied to, again.
How many times have experts told us that post Covid myocarditis is worse?
This is so disheartening— pun intended.
Read it yourself.
Why would those of is who disagree with your side be offended? It’s nothing personal to see another article is that is published in open source journal that is masquerading as a blog site promote something that is not a well designed study. The stats are poor and the population study is bad
However, your choice to believe it is neither offensive nor all that interesting. What will be personal are the oncoming statements that will no doubt take personal arrests directed at those of us who disagree with you because I linked an article that has exactly the opposite conclusions.
The real question is can issue be debated on its merits? The answer is of course no because the first 17 posts including that of the OP ask questions that are emotionally charged and on their face cannot be answers (one cannot price a negative) all of which is based on things never proven but represented as the gospel truth by your side.
Offended? No. Amused? Yes.
🤪
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid “vaccines” cause myocarditis and pericarditis but Covid infections do not. Huge 500k+ participant study. , gas_dr wrote: Why would those of is who disagree with your side be offended? It’s nothing personal to see another article is that is published in open source journal that is masquerading as a blog site (a real doctor would know that censorship is rampant in big name medical journals in order to protect 'the narrative') promote something that is not a well designed study.
(please post links wherein you state that the CDC/Pharma studies are useless in that they did not test transmission, infectivity, distribution, use on pregnant women).
The stats are poor and the population study is bad
So THAT's why the NIH published the study in Pub Med, the gold standard for litigation when you want to cite valid medical evidence in a court of law! The Deep State doesn't have absolute control over Pub Med however, as early on there was a report published there which made the case that Pfizer never provided it's trial patients with informed consent.
However, your choice to believe it is neither offensive nor all that interesting. What will be personal are the oncoming statements that will no doubt take personal arrests directed at those of us who disagree with you because I linked an article that has exactly the opposite conclusions.
China/Pfizer and other pharma have friends that will help protect billions and billons of profit by publishing whatever is 'needed' to defend the toxic 'vaccines'.
The real question is can issue be debated on its merits? The answer is of course no because the first 17 posts including that of the OP ask questions that are emotionally charged and on their face cannot be answers (one cannot price a negative) all of which is based on things never proven but represented as the gospel truth by your side.
'Vaccine' genocide gets us all worked up. for some reason it has the opposite effect on fake doctors like you.
Offended? No. Amused? Yes.
Like I said...
It is never preposterous to get to answers thru a trial.
In the beginning they told us the shot would prevent Covid.
i guess the case of myocarditis and pericarditis I routinely saw with covid long before the vaccine was available were just a deep state mirage. Good to know
In the beginning they told us the shot would prevent Covid.
Yep.
And, that it would keep the jabbed from spreading China virus…and, from being hospitalized, from China virus.
All lies.
cases should be. there were many of them
1. Did I advocate censorship? Clever to accuse me of something to control the narrative. Please show me where I said it should be censored. I merely pointed out what the source is.
2. I reject your argument. Post a source that confirms what you believe surrounded in inflammatory language. Scientists and clinicians like me discern the truth. If you do Not read nor research what I have said, I have been critical of many studies that advance answers and then fashion methodology for the desired result. Your question is rambling and strange.
3. Again a rambling and ooorly stitched sentence. As for the report that made the case that Pfizer didn’t provide informed consent, this was debunked and informed consent was obtained.
4. Another inflammatory claim with neither evidence nor proof. While I think there is some manipulation of many things your statement number four is neither provable nor particularly cogent. Jsit more buzzword.
5. The Ad hominem attack on me being fake when yet again you can not prove your statement. You love to make statements then ask someone else to prove them. There is no vaccine genocide. Again another inflammatory statement.
All five of tour statements are unhinged and lack a scintilla of evidence. Your opinions are your opinions. But they are hardly fact. You simply are leading groupthink
Amazing that…
a) they now ADMIT THEY ARE $HOT $HILLS and ….
b) they’re even slinking on to these proven right threads.
🤦🏼♀️
I can’t understand why they are backing the death potions...
You’re nothing but a fake doctor as well. Because you don’t toe the line of the Q continuum and believe blogs masking as literature are real! You harlot! The real doctors are those who make money charging $800 per seminar to hear their brilliance (Tenpemny) and the cardiologist whom lost his privileges because he lied about being revoked at a different hospital.
I enjoy how people say things with great authority that are patently false and yet they do not know the truth. And then tell us we have to prove it to their satisfaction.
It is difficult I suffer fools much more. It or merely entertaining.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid “vaccines” cause myocarditis and pericarditis but Covid infections do not. Huge 500k+ participant study. , Mom MD wrote: |
i guess the case of myocarditis and pericarditis I routinely saw with covid long before the vaccine was available were just a deep state mirage. Good to know |
Thank heavens you're a shill and not a real doctor. I can't imagine what actual patients would have experienced with you as their doctor!
Looks like I need to find a good holistic doctor.
Bearing false witness in Gods name again. You religious hypocrites are all alike. Have fun justifying your slander over a tag line invoking God. I’m sure He”s amused.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid “vaccines” cause myocarditis and pericarditis but Covid infections do not. Huge 500k+ participant study. , gas_dr wrote: 1. Did I advocate censorship? Clever to accuse me of something to control the narrative. Please show me where I said it should be censored. I merely pointed out what the source is.
2. I reject your argument. Post a source that confirms what you believe surrounded in inflammatory language. Scientists and clinicians like me discern the truth. If you do Not read nor research what I have said, I have been critical of many studies that advance answers and then fashion methodology for the desired result. Your question is rambling and strange.
3. Again a rambling and ooorly stitched sentence. As for the report that made the case that Pfizer didn’t provide informed consent, this was debunked and informed consent was obtained.
4. Another inflammatory claim with neither evidence nor proof. While I think there is some manipulation of many things your statement number four is neither provable nor particularly cogent. Jsit more buzzword.
5. The Ad hominem attack on me being fake when yet again you can not prove your statement. You love to make statements then ask someone else to prove them. There is no vaccine genocide. Again another inflammatory statement.
All five of tour statements are unhinged and lack a scintilla of evidence. Your opinions are your opinions. But they are hardly fact. You simply are leading groupthink
You have yet to establish any credibility, medical or otherwise, because you failed to provide any links stating that the the pharma trials were fraudulent in that they did not test if the 'vaccines' stop transmission, accumulate throughout vital organs in the body, prevent illness or are safe for pregnant women. Therefore it's ludicrous to see you posturing that this OP's study fails to live up to your 'lofty' standards.
1. I did not say you directly advocated censorship. I pointed to the fact that you have to pretend that there is no censorship re Covid research in order to justify your attack on this article for being published in an open source forum. Without open source publishing, the public would still believe people like you when you publish biased 'narrative' peer reviewed research.
2. You're not a scientist. You're a shill attacking threads which go against the narrative, and absolutely silent on the subject of validity when the shots are force on the world without testing them for efficacy or safety.
3. If you're going to play 'angry editor' then I get to play 'impatient spelling teacher.' I guess you really haven't been keeping up on all the proof that patients in the trials, as well as the millions of people who took the vax, were never informed at the rates of death, infertility, miscarriage, heart attack, stroke etc. that Pfizer wanted to conceal from public view for 75 years....
4. You cited a propaganda piece that Faucists use to push the vax. I pointed to the fact that it's propganda - the FDA, NIH and CDC joined ranks with pharma and have provided plenty of fake news including that attention getting piece in The Lancet.
5. I've made clear my objection to your handing out bad medical advice while ANONYMOUSLY claiming to be a doctor. For those who want to see your 'work' here are FR, you may check this thread: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3974843/posts
Note that you strenuously advised a desperately ill FReeper not to take Ivermectin, but to seek monoclonals instead. She spent her last hours looking for those monoclonals only to be turned away because her blood ox was too low. Knowing as you did she had been sick for some time, it still never occurred to you that a) monoclonals require a minimum blood ox level and b) given her state of illness her blood ox was likely too low.
This is just a small part of the basis to my objections to your pose as a doctor.
It's been a few weeks since you threatened me with your FAKE lawyer. Is he not taking your fake calls anymore?
5.
I’m genuinely grateful to God that you fake doctors do not actually have patients.
Offer proof right now that Mom Md and I are not real doctors. You have the goods you claim . Show them. Enough is enough of your lying. I know for a fact Mom Md is not only a physician but an excellent one. You would be lucky to have her care for you. Undeserving of her care, I know that she would even offer world class care to you.
You know in your heart you don’t know which makes you a liar. Because I do know the truth. And your constant impugning is outrageous.
Something about bearing false witness I remember reading. You are nothing but a liar. Nothing you say can be trusted because you are willing to lie about something you know nothing about. For shame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
