Posted on 11/02/2022 1:38:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
PING
File this one under N for No ——.
We knew that when they started using PCR testing. Even the inventor said they were not capable of detecting Covid accurately.
My wife is a Nurse and she was telling me how they were told to raise the sensitivity on the machines because Covid was ‘hiding’ from the tests. WTF?
Wow. un effing believable.
The published efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the published breakthrough rate, the published re-infection rate estimates - all of it is potentially rubbish given the 42% false discovery rate. No credible data exist on the efficacy or real-world effectiveness of SAR-CoV-2 targeting vaccines.
For your reading pleasure!
The false positives were obvious when those testing positive had no symptoms. The false positives kept the fear going and were used to discredit the vaccine.
“This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.”
and
“We have just published a new study that shows that nonQ-RT-PCR (non-quantitative RT-PCR testing as used to diagnose COVID-19 from 2020 to the present day suffers a flaw that ultimately draws into question all of what has been reported on COVID-19 by official channels, including the results of COVID-19.”
Who is we?
Sub stack does not publish scientific articles.
Why are all the sub stack articles so poorly written and presented?
— Note. The vaccines do not work - I am only addressing the incomprehensible poor quality article, too representative of what is often posted here.
The number of cycles needed to detect the virus depends on who is President. If it’s President Trump you have to run more cycles.
It’s science.
Sarcasm
>>The false positives kept the fear going and were used to discredit the vaccine<<
Expect THIS to be used against Trump...
The inventor said to only cycle the test 25 times or you will pick up other viruses.
CDC said 35 times (94% false positives)
We went from 36 million case of influenza in 2019 to 7000 in 2020. Masks really work! /s
The new CDC director spoke to PCR tests flagging false positives 12 weeks after you weren’t officially infected.
This seemingly led to the CDC finally banning the use of the “Gold Standard” test doctors, governments, and businesses were requiring.
I personally believe the false positives were far higher if a fake positive happens after 12 weeks of non-infection.
I assume you think anti-COVID vaccine people wielded undue authority over the Fauci’s of the world, and that governors like DeSantis smeared the vaccine and a mandate for it, using PCR false positives?
Get real.
Didn’t the inventor die? Under mysterious circumstances?
“the inventor said they were not capable of detecting Covid accurately.” True. Christian Drosten and his colleagues had published an article in Eurosurveillance on January 23, 2020, in which they claimed to have developed a RT-PCR test for SARS covid 19. But Christian Drosten and his colleagues did not have the SARS covid 19 virus while making the RT-PCR test. Doh! It’s like not having oatmeal while making oatmeal cookies.
it allowed fedgov to control the number of cases and therefore hospitalizations and deaths
fauci and wallensky said hospitalizations included with and from covid and would investigate
still waiting
Quite the verbiage- so it’s the test’s flaw that made it fatal then, not collaborating and colluding with evil by men? We need test control! And I thought the test was just a delivery system.
He died but I thought it was from pneumonia.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Fatal Flaw in PCR Testing: 42% False Discovery Rate for SARS-CoV-2 nonQ-RT-PCR Test. This means COVID-19 Vaccine Outcomes Rate Data are Unreliable and Invalid, ifinnegan wrote: “This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.”
and
“We have just published a new study that shows that nonQ-RT-PCR (non-quantitative RT-PCR testing as used to diagnose COVID-19 from 2020 to the present day suffers a flaw that ultimately draws into question all of what has been reported on COVID-19 by official channels, including the results of COVID-19.”
Who is we?
Sub stack does not publish scientific articles.
Why are all the sub stack articles so poorly written and presented?
— Note. The vaccines do not work - I am only addressing the incomprehensible poor quality article, too representative of what is often posted here.
"We" is the author of this substack piece and a colleague. If you read the article, he wrote about their work and linked to publications and a presentation. But you have to read it to know that.
I'm grateful for substack - it allows scientists to publish results of their research in order to reach the general public who lack subscriptions to scientific journals. So many more would be dead from the Plandemic and the 'not-a-vaccine' if not for researchers getting past the public censorship with websites like substack.
He was an open critic of FRAUDci....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=pcr%20inventor
The Mysterious Death of Dr. Fauci’s Most Notable Critic
banned.video ^ | May 21 | banned.video
Posted on 5/22/2021, 2:56:07 PM by RandFan
The late Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, has been blowing the whistle on Fauci and big pharma for thirty years...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3961529/posts
🤷♀️
(See tagline.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.