PING
File this one under N for No ——.
We knew that when they started using PCR testing. Even the inventor said they were not capable of detecting Covid accurately.
My wife is a Nurse and she was telling me how they were told to raise the sensitivity on the machines because Covid was ‘hiding’ from the tests. WTF?
Wow. un effing believable.
The published efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the published breakthrough rate, the published re-infection rate estimates - all of it is potentially rubbish given the 42% false discovery rate. No credible data exist on the efficacy or real-world effectiveness of SAR-CoV-2 targeting vaccines.
For your reading pleasure!
The false positives were obvious when those testing positive had no symptoms. The false positives kept the fear going and were used to discredit the vaccine.
“This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.”
and
“We have just published a new study that shows that nonQ-RT-PCR (non-quantitative RT-PCR testing as used to diagnose COVID-19 from 2020 to the present day suffers a flaw that ultimately draws into question all of what has been reported on COVID-19 by official channels, including the results of COVID-19.”
Who is we?
Sub stack does not publish scientific articles.
Why are all the sub stack articles so poorly written and presented?
— Note. The vaccines do not work - I am only addressing the incomprehensible poor quality article, too representative of what is often posted here.
The new CDC director spoke to PCR tests flagging false positives 12 weeks after you weren’t officially infected.
This seemingly led to the CDC finally banning the use of the “Gold Standard” test doctors, governments, and businesses were requiring.
I personally believe the false positives were far higher if a fake positive happens after 12 weeks of non-infection.
it allowed fedgov to control the number of cases and therefore hospitalizations and deaths
fauci and wallensky said hospitalizations included with and from covid and would investigate
still waiting
Quite the verbiage- so it’s the test’s flaw that made it fatal then, not collaborating and colluding with evil by men? We need test control! And I thought the test was just a delivery system.
In the movie, The Real Anthony Fauci, I thought the guy who invented the PCR test said it should never even have been used for that purpose. A total waste of time.
1. For every 50 true positives out of 1,000, a total of 86 people with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments will be reported.
Of these, 36 of these will be false positives.
2. For every 50 true positives, 86 people without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments will be have to be isolated/quarantined.
Of these, 36 will not be infected.
3. For every 50 true positives that are tested and found positive in-hospital, 86 people with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments
will be told that they "have COVID-19".
If the 36 false positive patients are hospitalized with other COVID-19 patients, they will likely then contract a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. The number of "cases" via positive PCR has been overstated by a factor of 72% (the original post read “80:1” assuming a prevalence of 5%).
5. This is true for generic case reporting up until May 2021 when CDC decided to reduce the PCR cycle threshold value (Ct) for the vaccinated to less than 27,
leaving the unvaccinated rate biased by high false discovery rate of arbitrarily high Ct, biasing all reported rates in these two groups favoring cases in the unvaccinated from that point on.
6. This +72% bias is true in any clinical trial or any study that used arbitrarily high Ct values, INCLUDING THE VACCINE STUDIES.
As a direct result of this fatal flaw, combined with CDC’s gaff “PCR+ = COVID-19"?
There are no credible COVID-19 vaccine trial data. "
(My Comment) : All bold and Italics shown above are mine
The PCR tests are statistically unreliable and misidentified infection at a significantly high rate
Please read the entire report for your own edification.
Carotid free-floating thrombus during COVID-19 vaccine era: causality or not?
From the conclusion...
...In our cases, it is difficult to analyze the relationship between BNT and AIS because of concomitant comorbidities. Nevertheless, the short time elapsed from vaccine administration and the onset of neurological symptoms raises a strong suspicion of causal relationship.
Bold is mine.