Replies

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Fatal Flaw in PCR Testing: 42% False Discovery Rate for SARS-CoV-2 nonQ-RT-PCR Test. This means COVID-19 Vaccine Outcomes Rate Data are Unreliable and Invalid, ifinnegan wrote:
“This is the most important study we will ever likely publish in our journal.”
and
“We have just published a new study that shows that nonQ-RT-PCR (non-quantitative RT-PCR testing as used to diagnose COVID-19 from 2020 to the present day suffers a flaw that ultimately draws into question all of what has been reported on COVID-19 by official channels, including the results of COVID-19.”
Who is we?
Sub stack does not publish scientific articles.
Why are all the sub stack articles so poorly written and presented?
— Note. The vaccines do not work - I am only addressing the incomprehensible poor quality article, too representative of what is often posted here.

"We" is the author of this substack piece and a colleague. If you read the article, he wrote about their work and linked to publications and a presentation. But you have to read it to know that.
I'm grateful for substack - it allows scientists to publish results of their research in order to reach the general public who lack subscriptions to scientific journals. So many more would be dead from the Plandemic and the 'not-a-vaccine' if not for researchers getting past the public censorship with websites like substack.