Posted on 10/05/2022 5:29:52 AM PDT by MtnClimber
It is more than a misguided but well-intentioned mistake. It is a brazen lie, promulgated by some of the most dangerous people who have ever lived.
"This anti-sustainability backlash, this anti-woke backlash, is incredibly dangerous for the world." — Alan Jope, CEO, Unilever, speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative
t would not be an exaggeration to say this is probably one of the most inverted takes on what is “dangerous” in the history of civilization. Not because anyone is against the concept of sustainability, but because sustainability as defined by Alan Jope is incredibly unsustainable. If he gets his way, he will destroy the world.
Jope, Clinton, the infamous Karl Schwab who heads the World Economic Forum, the ESG movement informally headed by Larry Fink of BlackRock (with over $10 trillion in investments), and all the rest who champion today’s prevailing globalist climate agenda are coercing nearly 8 billion people into an era of poverty and servitude.
The primary target of the “sustainability” movement is fossil fuel, the burning of which allegedly is causing catastrophic climate change. Heedless of the fact that fossil fuel provides more than 80 percent of all energy consumed worldwide, banks, hedge funds and institutional investors throughout the Western world are using ESG criteria (environment, social, governance), to deny the financing necessary to maintain or build new fossil fuel infrastructure.
It’s working. Pressure from governments, international NGOs, and global finance is now delivering unprecedented shifts in policies around the world, creating needless scarcity and turmoil. In just the last month, new emissions rules have triggered protests by farmers in the Netherlands, Canada, Spain, Italy, Poland, and elsewhere. Sri Lanka, in the process of earning a near perfect ESG score, lost its ability to feed its people. In the ensuing fury, the president was forced to flee the country. Undaunted, globalist climate activists are discouraging African nations from developing natural gas.
It should be easy to see the hidden agenda behind this repression. If you control energy and food, you control the world. The biggest multinational corporations on Earth are empowered by ESG mandates, because marginal or emerging competitors lack the financial resiliency to comply. From small independent private farmers and ranchers to small independent nations, once their ability to produce is broken, the big players pick up the pieces for pennies on the dollar. But that’s not what you read in the Washington Post.
In a blistering editorial published on September 18, under “The Post’s View,” the editors wrote “The World’s Ice is Melting: Humanity Must Prepare for the Consequences.” For at least 30 years, and with increasing frequency and intensity, it is not the weather that has become extreme, but rather these proclamations. We have now reached the point where every major institution in the Western world is bent on spreading this panic. Yet very little of it is justified by the facts.
To verify the credibility of the globalist climate agenda, should it have any, several hurdles have to be overcome. If global warming and extreme weather is definitely happening, then how serious is the problem, what is the cause of the problem, and what are rational solutions to the problem? To all four of these questions, serious debate is mostly absent from mainstream discourse. Skeptics are pariahs.
But if a skeptical response to any one of these four questions is accepted, the entire edifice of climate alarm collapses. Consider each of them:
Melting ice is sort of a trump card in the hands of the climate alarm community. If every molecule of ice on top of Greenland were to melt into the ocean, sea level would rise by over 20 feet. If the entire 5 million square mile Antarctic continent were to lose its ice, sea level would rise by 200 feet. That much is indisputable. But is ice in retreat?
The Wall Street Journal recently published an analysis by theoretical physicist Steven Koonin, where he noted that Antarctica has been ice-covered for over 30 million years, and is covered with over 26 million gigatons (a gigaton is a cubic kilometer) of ice. He points out that even at the current estimated rate of net loss, 250 gigatons per year, it would take a century for sea level to rise 3 inches. What Koonin ought also to point out is that 250/26,000,000 is a fraction so small, it is unlikely to exceed the margin for error using existing measurement technology.
In Greenland, as in Antarctica, summer ice melt is offset by snow that causes accumulation of ice in the interior. A recent paper authored by NOAA’s Michael Gallagher evaluates how snowfall affects ice mass in Greenland. Throughout the document, the author acknowledges large uncertainties that make it difficult to predict that climate change automatically signifies net losses in ice mass. It may be that a warmer climate would cause increased snowfall to more than offset increased melting in Greenland.
Yep... Just another subfolder in the main folder named “The Great Culling”.
We out number them.
So,it’s a matter of time before they have to systemically enslave us and/ or eleminate us.
Especially the ones who will not play along with the new world disorder.
Ayn Rand wrote never examine a folly only what it achieves. In this case suicide of the West . Who gains ? China. When your goal is taking over the world you must first make the rest of the world weak enough to take over.
“It is more than a misguided but well-intentioned mistake. It is a brazen lie, promulgated by some of the most dangerous people who have ever lived.”
It seems to me the Leftists along with the Lame Street Media and billionaires are on target for their One World Government with them in charge and us eating out of their garbage cans.
It’s a scam to steal wealth. Period. There is no way to fix the climate or control the weather.
Yes, it’s not just the death shot anymore that constitutes a crime against humanity, but the whole stink’n anti-humanist plan that presents a clear and present danger to worldwide civilization’s future. All the perps and their facilitators need to be taken to Nuremberg and prosecuted for crimes against humanity as a way of attempting to turn this ‘crazy’ around. Given the range of offenses, I can’t help but wonder if this attack is off-planet contrived and inspired. It’s simply too concerted and widespread an anti-humanistic effort to be viewed in any way other than an effort to exterminate homo sapiens. Is there blackmail being applied by off-planet entities to force this absurd, insane approach here on Planet Earth? Whatever can be said about all that’s going on, it’s clearly not normal behavior by any past earthly standards. Count up all the ways being applied toward the demise of world civilization and what answer do you come up with?
CO2 is a trace gas in our atmosphere at little over 400 parts per MILLION. CO2 is not a pollutant but is essential for all green plant life on earth. To think that part per million changes of a single trace gas in our atmosphere drives the climate of the entire planet and other factors such variations in solar output, the wobble of the earths axis and deep ocean currents have little or no influence in comparison is preposterous.
“what answer do you come up with?”
I’m sure the best answer is that the space creatures are trying to warn us how dangerous the world is becoming. They probably started with Malthus. For a long time we managed to keep the world from meeting his dire predictions, but we are again at some kind of tipping point. Use of nukes is being tossed around like confetti. Every year we have storms somewhere with 2 feet or more of rain. I have been paying attention to weather for over 70 years and it is definitely changing. Whether humans are causing it or it is coming from space beings to warn us, we definitely need to pay attention. All the CO2 warners are wrong, the big danger is the more poisonous Methane we will soon be experiencing. Apparently they have made some aware of this danger. Others have been warned that warming and melting in the north Atlantic will likely destroy the deep water circulation that maintains the warm Gulf Stream current. Then Russia and Europe will truly be punished by the cold and starvation for their hubris. But too few people are listening to the space aliens. They see our foolish behavior, currently a stupid war between Russia and Ukraine that does no one any good. Is there any hope for human sanity. I am not holding my breath.
Also, why did this article get put in the China search list? It belongs in Catastrophism!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.