Here is an idea, why not follow the evidence where it takes you, instead of trying to prove an idiotic idea is right?
You know, it's like stop trying to convince yourself that man is responsible for changing the weather.
“Experiments have failed to prove evidence of cosmic inflation.” False. In other news, Edwin Hubble discovered at Mt. Wilson Observatory in Los Angeles in 1929 that everywhere you look everything is rapidly moving away from each other by using the red shift. And yes, the pictures from the new Hubble telescope are wonderful.
I knew the big bang theory was bullshit the first time I heard that Galaxies are colliding out there in the cosmos. it may have takin millions of years but if there was a big bang then they all should be going the same way and all the same distance from the bang. Like an ever expanding bubble.
If they can prove that the Big Bang never happened, will they have to rename that TV show?
The Big Bang fit the evidence for a long time. Now new evidence is coming in and people are having to rethink the Big Bang. Ideas have a certain momentum to them and people have difficulty letting them go when they have been held for a long time.
Scientists are people with their flaws. My biggest objection is when the science was fraudulent from the get-go and people are so vested in the fraud they actively suppress the truth, i.g. Global Warming.
From its link:
"In light of the death of the Queen and the festival's proximity to the State funeral, we have postponed HowTheLightGetsIn London 2022 from the weekend of the 17th-18th September to the 1st-2nd October."
Well there was this:
Nobody's going to stop the light from getting in. Thank you, JWST.
I worked on the Webb. I am so proud
In the beginning….
The problem is not usually the evidence, it’s a person’s worldview or presuppositions. You might say we all have the same evidence but can reach different conclusions based on what we believe - our worldview. These scientists are looking at evidence - they are just reaching a conclusion that is based on their naturalistic expectations. It’s hard to examine your own view - but it is possible. Admitting you have one, and thus have a sort of bias pro or con regarding a certain subject is often a start. But usually people are not that honest or maybe perceptive. And some people hate the idea of God and purposely work to oppose that view. Most, but not all scientists hold a naturalistic view of origins. Some believe in a Creator and of course some are not sure. When expected evidence contradicts what scientists actually find then it tends to challenge their worldview. It’s very common for anyone to find a ‘rescuing devise’ which allows them to keep their worldview. Of course, because we’re human, egos can often be on the line regarding who’s smartest, nobody’s fool and all that. In the case of God’s existance and evidence to support or contradict, it it’s easy to see how the battle is, and has been, engaged for all of human history. For me, I’m sticking with a Creator who made it all. When I see the images from the JWST I think of the passage in Psalm 19, “The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament shows his handy work…” To me it shows his infinite qualities. It’s evidence that backs up his claims. Others see it as a pretty accident and wonder how it all came about. So, now you know my worldview ;- )
If you look up at the night sky away from city lights you can see nebula that spells out: B I G B A N G