Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[CatHerd]

The plural “you” is inclusive (stands in place of “both of you” or “all of you” or whatever). It does not mean “one of you” or “some of you”.

The “plural you” does not get you off the hook. You included me in the accusation, and your post was addressed only to me. It was a false accusation.

You keep coming up with one excuse after another, always trying to blame me for your errors and continually calling *me* the liar.

I’m pretty easy going and normally overlook such things. Normally, however, the person who goofed and made a false accusation just says “Sorry, I was in a hurry, didn’t mean to include you, I see now you never said that.” And I say “no probs, we all make make mistakes.” You, on the other hand, continued to be abusive.

Right wing, right-wing, rightwing. It’s commonly spelled all three ways when used as an adjective. Somehow you failed to remember you had just just used that phrase — and again called *me* a liar.

Notice I have not accused you of lying, even though you fling that accusation around without basis as casually and as liberally as you fling “troll” and “get rekt”. I chose to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume error followed by memory lapse. Accusing someone of lying is a serious thing. One should never do it lightly. Based on your past posts, I know you disagree, but I stand by that.

This has degenerated into a very silly argument, one that would have ended posts ago had you displayed even a modicum of good will.

[bagster]

Feel free to post the “Mocking” I’ve done. To prove your case.

You can't be serious. Are you bi-polar?

Otherwise you’re just another pseudo proxy Q Follower that’s angry and trying to falsely label people that don’t agree with your premises.

Tell me, rabbit. Are there Q followers under your bed and do they come out at night when you're in your jammies?

[David Chase]

Excuse me, I don’t wear jammies.

I’m in full dress uniform and sleep flat on my back at attention ready for action.

[bagster]

I would think of 260 Million people that got vaccinated at least 50% are Christian Conservative.

Oh, 'you would think' huh? Is this what the male nurse community calls the scientific method? Now we know why never became a doctor like your mommy wanted you to.

Tell us what else 'you would think', ya big dummy.

Because in these times, character doesn’t matter as long as the person (grifter) says what you want to hear and agrees with you.

If I were a fan/follower of Fauci/CDC/WHO/FDA/Pfizer, I'd stay awary from mentioning character, Chase. Not your best topic.

#FauciTheory

[bagster]

I’m pretty easy going and normally overlook such things.

No, dear. You are an officious, overbearing, obnoxious, tee-totaller with airs. You are the reincarnation of one of them chicks that marched for prohibition in a big dress and stupid hat.

How many posts are you gonna make carrying on about 'right wing'? Your diversionary tactics are legendary, but ultimately boring. Stay on topic and try to stop traveling down the dusty roads of your morally superior ego. Nobody cares about how proper you are.

We just want to see you spout your vax denying nonsense so we can laugh at you. You and the fans/followers of Fauci theory are like going to the sideshow at the circus. We just have to lay down a shiny nickel and watch the freaks dance.

Get on with it.

[bagster]

Excuse me, I don’t wear jammies.

That's wife abuse. Making your poor wife look at that whole disgusting, doughy mess.

How can you be so cruel?

[bagster]

Nice one sentence 'paragraph' stream. We've been over this, Chase.

#PresentationCounts

[David Chase]

Ok chronic complainer.

They’re not paragraphs.

The purpose is to make them easier to read.
Easier to see.

[bagster]

I’m in full dress uniform and sleep flat on my back at attention ready for action.

[David Chase]

😆😂🤣🤪

Knock it off!

(It’s too early for JR to say it.)

[bagster]

Ok chronic complainer.

You do realize that the lion's share of your posts are you complaining about 'Q followers' and 'conspiracy theorists' and 'anti-vaxxers'?

Right? They’re not paragraphs. The purpose is to make them easier to read. Easier to see.

Then you fail. Your one sentence messes cause the eye to pause each time you start over. This is the opposite of easier to read. Proper paragraphs flow from one thought to another. THAT'S easier to read.

Pay attention to what Daddy says, Chase. I'm trying to make you a better man.

[bagster]

Knock it off! (It’s too early for JR to say it.)

JR would know how to use punctuation with parenthees. You sir, are no JR. And besides, what would a nub know about JR?

[gas_dr]

I haven’t lost my privileges for stopping remdesevir because it is a bad drug. I didn’t lose my privileges for using ivermectin nor HCQ early on. I just dropped using or because it didn’t do a thing to help not marred how badly I wanted it to work.

Your age at me because the a friend of a friend of yours lost his privileges because he lied about being on staff at a place where he wasn’t. This is the reason he is in trouble. Little to do with Covid. As for FLCCC you are aware that their website at the height of delta said the vaccination was an important tool for Covid in terms of preventing death and serious disease? You are aware they supported non forced vaccination just as I have always supported the same.

You have nurses who you support. Let me tell you about the critical care nurses, the very best of the best who i have the high privilege of working with everyday. These nurses of which there are many stories and I have personally witnessed and intervened for whom have been physically and verbally assaulted by families because they had a relative die and these nurses were assaulted for not giving ivermectin at the latest stage where no literature supports its use. They were assaulted because passion shave been so inflamed by people who beat the war drum that every physician and health care provider is in on a conspiracy to kill people.

You bring up my identity. At least one member is this community has discovered my identity and doxxed me. It happened at my church. As Jane has scoffed at me through “indirect” pings I am threatening legal action. I am threatening nothing. I have transparently said that the posts of the member who has disclosed my identity accused me of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, malpractice (of course he or she said before I was doxxed they would file a complaint against my license for malpractice demonstrating a complete ignorance od concepts like elements of a tort and standing). When the totality is the facts are considered, all elements of the fort of libel are present. The only question is will I pursue a complaint. I have two years to decide.

You accuse Methodist hospital of negligence for not promoting effective early treatment protocols. These early treatment protocols you promote are not the standard of care. They are a guess as to if effective. But here you are I intentionally mislead by using words which mean things in ways that are fundamentally dishonest. Negligence implies the intentional deviation from a standard of care. But you don’t care to explain this. IMath+ is not a standard of care. There are no established standards of care with this law disease.

How do you know I am not a liar? You don’t. I suspect that if I proceed with action against whom doxxed me it will come out I am Not a liar. There is not a single thing I have written that into factually accurate at the fine I wrote it. McCullough has been disciplined for lying. You seem to want to look past that. Lying about nothing to do with covid by the way.

As for my results once I learned how to treat the disease with the things at my disposal, it was excellent. The key was bypassing all the bullcrap and not wasting time. With a positive diagnosis back at the peak of the worst strain, immediate monoclonal therapy save lives. High risk explosives that I was made aware of, I gave monoclonals for prophylaxis. Those patients never developed disease. And yet I was impugned right here on this forum for that practice. I know of at least four cases where delay in getting monoclonals for seeking horse paste lead to deaths. And yes, they did take the ivermectin. There are likely thousands of similar stories.

If you and all the others wanted to be heroes, you would have evolved your knowledge. Instead of railing about not using ivermectin and HCQ, but had thrown the full force of this following in exposing the intentional slow production of monoclonals and then the redistribution of them to blue states from Florida essentially making them a controlled substance is the real conspiracy. There was an early treatment protocol. It was wildly effective. But you became stuck on your position. This likely had lead to harm.

I think the greatest story while never be told and is exactly in your wheelhouse and certainly in the wheelhouse of those who look in depth is the suppression and redistribution of monoclonals as an early treatment and prophylaxis for those who didn’t want vaccination. I reference the success rate of treatment in Florida where monoclonals were procured immediately and without bred tape by the phenomenal work of Desantis.

I have answered everyone of your questions honestly and with consideration. I hope you digest my thoughts instead of rejecting out of hand because we disagree on the data interpretation.

I have advocated at all levels accessible to me as a physician about monoclonals. I am insisting that remdesivir is no longer used. And in the rare cases when I see it, I stop it. I no longer recommend vaccination for eveyone but do for the most vulnerable. As the data has developed I continue to evolve my practice. I do not unilaterally prescribe paxlovid at this time. If there are risk factors I think it is reasonable, however omicron is so mild to those with no risk factors, I think the risks of rebound outweigh the benefits of theoretically shortened symptoms.

There is common ground here. I make no judgment as to your conservative bona fides. I take you at your word. I make no judgments about your faith. I take you at your word. The real question is will we find out common ground and unify, or continue division.

I am worried that as this whole pandemic fades we will lose sight of what we lost. On the clinical side monoclonal therapies can be rapidly developed for specific treatment and apparently prophylaxis. This is where we should be screaming loud and long at suppression of science. Almost all are in agreement as to these therapies. That’s what happens when A silver bullet is discovered. We can ready the delivery infrastructure for the next one

I happen to agree that this pandemic caused by a genetic shift looks man made to me. I think it was illegal gain of function research funded by Fauci. There is the crime and this should not be lost. Do I think there is geopolitical ramifications and china is a bad actor. Absolutely. If we are not preparing for war against china, might as well start learning mandarin.

I have advocate and changes policies where families were not allowed in the hospital. Where a policy was initiated that I thought was wrong, I disregarded it and wrote orders specific to my patients that in some cases directly conflicted with stupid policies and lent the full weight of my authority as a physician against them. No I didn’t lose my privileges. But I also know how to exercise that authority.

I was going to end this by asking two questions. At this point I will defer as I am hopeful based on this dialogue we may find some common ground. I am hopeful to find that ground. I know my areas of expertise as well as not my areas of expertise. I will lend my expertise and hope those, like you, will look in the right places and make noise to effect change. Leveraging each of our abilities is a force multiplier not a division.

I look forward to your response
And for any typos please forgive. Fat fingers. Small keyboard.

[dforest]

This is very alarming.

https://twitter.com/bambkb/status/1563634666745126914

[metmom]

It’s ludicrous that the biggest argument the Vax Covidians can garner up is that that being *anti-vax* started with *Q* theory.

That’s the best they can do??????? Try to discredit it by attaching it to a easily attacked source?

That’s pretty weak.

They’d be much further ahead providing stats and statements that the vaxes do what vaccines are supposed to do (confer immunity), have been thoroughly tested and are known to be relatively free of risk, which they can’t because even TPTB admit that myocarditis and blood clotting are side effects of the vaxes, or that the vaxes prevent one from both catching and spreading the virus, which TPTB have admitted they don’t and is also easily observable to the most causal observer.

So they hang their hat on the supposition that the vaxes keep you from getting as sick as you may have been if you didn’t have it, which there is no way in the world to prove because you cannot go back in time and and change your vax status and catch Covid all over again and compare the difference in the course of the disease.

So what they are left with is a “vaccine” that doesn’t work, with some potentially serious side effects, with unknown long term consequences, and their only way to counter it is to mock the people who are suspect of it and try to tie it to some kind of *anti-science* movement.

It’s pretty pathetic that that’s the best they have in their arsenal.

[stylin19a]

Not related to the vaxes and it may not answer your question, but...
I didn’t get any vaxes. I got COVID pretty bad and the fallout required tests that included an ulta sound to check for blood clots.

[bagster]

Well, that was a well thought out and delivered post, gassie. I could have done without the incessant 'dox' squeeing, but other than that. well done.

See, less whining, less arrogance, less Qtard' bashing and more actual communication, makes a doc healthy, wealthy, and wise.

You may be salvagable after all. Now if you would only realize that HCQ and Ivermectin are probably worthless by the time a patient get to you (and your gas), you would be more in touch with reality.

McCullough has been disciplined for lying. You seem to want to look past that. Lying about nothing to do with covid by the way.

The defense is willing to stipulate that he 'lied' about being on some staff. Besides appearing to be a medical community 'witch hunt' due to his going against them, you yourself admit that has nothing to do with covid, yet you use it to dismiss his covid work.

It reeks of professional jealousy to me, and an uncomfortable conformity. I urge you to reconsider the actual facts the man points out, despite his oh so terrible 'lies' (eyeroll). Its like you people want to dirty somebody up so you can then use the dirt to relegate them to some type of ashbin of unbelievability.

This is a cheap tactic and unintellectual.

[bagster]

Your tweet.

(video at link)

Oh my god…about 50% of athletes in the big 10 have had cardiac scans and have Myocarditis without symptoms yet…………straight insanity pic.twitter.com/ptdR76UCb8— Kevin B - liar.com - (@bambkb) August 27, 2022

[CatHerd]

I specified Wolf’s credentials as I was replying to a post about about medical doctors. Also several Freepers have assumed she is an MD; same with Steve Kirsch(!).

It is also relevant because she has no background in science and cannot properly oversee this “crowdsourced” project of hers and apparently has not appointed anyone who can. She already failed miserably in the social sciences type of research she previously attempted, and was even called out on egregious errors in her thesis (which also reflects poorly on her alma mater). Her last book was so riddled with errors her publisher had to pulp all copies.

Naomi Wolf and her “crowdsourced project” issued a “report” so full of such ridiculous and glaring errors others (including other vax doomers) called her out on them and one of her “researchers” had to note it on her website.

If she truly has all these MDs on board, they’re either utterly incompetent or not showing up.

One of those who called her out on her errors, was this guy, who provides the Pfizer pages and tables so you can see for yourself:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html

For more, see:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=200#200

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=198#198

https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=247#247

Dr. Bowden seems to be profiting off her vax doomer stance. Apparently, she announced on Twitter she would not accept any new patients who had received Covid vaccine. Another doctor, outraged at Bowden’s grifter-style website made this video:

https://www.tiktok.com/@mamadoctorjones/video/7027980935702416687

“For the low, low cost of $375, you can get the same PCR COVID test that you would get for free at Walgreens from Dr. Bowden.”

Dr. Urso is an ophthalmologist with Frontline Doctors, and I listed them. Dr. Marble is also affiliated with Frontline Doctors. Perhaps Dr. Marble treats patients for free, and that is very nice of him. His website says: “MYFREEDOCTOR.COM DOES NOT ENGAGE IN THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE OR PROVIDE ANY OTHER HEALTH SERVICES. NO HEALTHCARE PROVIDER/PATIENT RELATIONSHIP IS CREATED WHEN YOU ACCESS THE SITE OR SERVICES” (Sorry for the all caps, I used copy-paste.).

Also this: “Myfreedoctor.com’s Site provides certain telehealth related information and/or facilitates your access to telemedicine and expert medical services. Myfreedoctor.com is independent of the healthcare providers who will be providing such telemedicine services to you through the Site and Myfreedoctor.com is not liable, in anyway, whatsoever, for such healthcare providers’ acts, omissions or for any content of the communication made by them.”

Link: https://myfreedoctor.com/terms-and-conditions

This is from Time, which is not exactly the most trustworthy of sources, but if even *some* of the claims made in this article are true, it’s quite concerning. And if any are false, why haven’t the Frontline Doctors sued?

How ‘America’s Frontline Doctors’ Sold Access to Bogus COVID-19 Treatments—and Left Patients in the Lurch

https://web.archive.org/web/20220813030152/https://time.com/6092368/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-19-misinformation/

“Over the past three months, a TIME investigation found, hundreds of AFLD customers and donors have accused the group of touting a service promising prescriptions for ivermectin, which medical authorities say should not be taken to treat or prevent COVID-19, and failing to deliver after a fee had been paid. Some customers described being charged for consultations that did not happen. Others said they were connected to digital pharmacies that quoted excessive prices of up to $700 for the cheap medication. In more than 3,000 messages reviewed by TIME, dozens of people described their or their family members’ COVID-19 symptoms worsening while they waited for an unproven “wonder drug” that didn’t arrive.”

>>>>>Re your “Imagine having to spend $5000 to get a Court to order a hospital to feed a cv patient who has been given no food or water for a week. That’s the state of modern cv death care. And they can get away with it because of the Prep Act.”<<<<<

That sounds ghastly! I have not heard or read about this. Perhaps you would do me the kindness of providing a link?

[bagster]

It’s pretty pathetic that that’s the best they have in their arsenal.

It does get old, doesn't it.

#RatsInACorner