Posted on 08/23/2022 5:47:17 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance. As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking revisions to the definition of “UFO.” Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins.
As first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence rebrands UFOs as “unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.” Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs.
The revised definition of “UFO” also includes “transmedium” objects which, according to lawmakers, “transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.”
In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. A report accompanying the legislation notes that “transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially.”
It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence. Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have [and] that we are not capable of defending against” (among several other eyebrow-raising comments).
Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of “UFO” excludes “man-made” objects.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Objects that defy the laws of physics are not themselves physical at all. They are demons.
If they’re here, and their intent was hostile, I suspect they could wipe us out in a blink of the eye. That they haven’t might indicate they’re just curious observers.
Rather, God permits their incursions but limits their damage.
For a scholarly study, see Lights in the Sky & Little Green Men: A Rational Christian Look at UFOs and Extraterrestrials.
Physics has a pretty dominant vote in any “emerging consensus”, and often doesn’t go along with the crowd.
Here's a good video interview published yesterday re: this subject...
Ross Coulthart | UFO Disclosure, Admirał Wilson Leaks, Crash Retrievals, Congress & More
Objects that defy the laws of physics
—
So you are saying we know all the laws of physics? like they knew them 200 years ago? Just how much hubris do you have any have anyway?
Your insistence that they are “demons” just proves the point - not ready for contact.
Well, since humans can’t fly, I’d say that’s a pretty good bet.
“the military (the Air Force specifically) took it to determine if it had any value re: national defense.”
That is generally true.
However, we now know for example in the Trinity case, that it was the Atomic Energy Commission that seized and hoarded the information.
The whole notion of “national defense” in this context is a caricature of human stupidity.
If these things are a risk to one country they are a risk to all—there is nothing “national” about it!
You protest too much. What is driving your stubborn insistence?
Whats driving your hubris?
I have none—I gave it to Jesus. Anytime it recurs, the Holy Spirit slays it again.
To the extent you object to my ability to state readily ascertainable fact, I refer you to the excellent book I cited by an astrophysicist.
So, I’ve answered your question. Now, if you have the courage, it’s your turn.
Go away.
When the government (Air Force, AEC, or other) said “national defense value,” I think they meant value in the sense of using what we had in our possession as a weapon or as an aid in developing weapons against our adversaries (Russia, China).
As you wish.
In the absence of other information, they could well be demons.
However, things that defy the laws of physics are defying those laws in THREE dimensions.
Introduce another dimension and they could easily be following those physical laws.
I think they are, in fact, extraterrestrial aliens that have mastered four (or more) dimensions.
That is a perfect description of angels. The reason I qualified it as the angelic subset "demons" is that the behaviors reported do not comport with God's revealed will and are typical of resistance to it, which is what demons do.
The problem with your theory is lack of evidence; indeed, astrobiology is often scorned as "the only scientific endeavor which is completely devoid of data".
By contrast, we have an enormous abundance of evidence for angels (and for theophanies). So, the probabilities argue strongly for an angelic, hence demonic, explanation.
I mean, who are we alerting with this evidence, aliens not from this earth? If they exist, i suspect they know they exist, don't you? 🙂
Biblical angels are "messengers" of course but there are plenty of other types of holy spiritual beings besides angels that we know little about.
And demons is another confusing term. Are they the spirits of the Watchers OR are they spirits of the dead offspring of the fallen Watchers (i.e., spirits of the Nephilim).
The Bible isn't particularly clear here. Even the Ethiopian Book of Enoch doesn't tell us that the Nephilim spirits will return in such the manner as we are now seeing.
All very strange.
Exactly.
Dr John Mack did an interview with the children in Africa about the mass sighting they witness. Several children reported saying the beings want us to take better care of the environment and don't embrace technology…
I thought that very odd sounding like something from the Democrats playbook.
I only came to that point of view after years of observation and reading materials on the subject.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.