Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

“the military (the Air Force specifically) took it to determine if it had any value re: national defense.”

That is generally true.

However, we now know for example in the Trinity case, that it was the Atomic Energy Commission that seized and hoarded the information.

The whole notion of “national defense” in this context is a caricature of human stupidity.

If these things are a risk to one country they are a risk to all—there is nothing “national” about it!


47 posted on 08/23/2022 10:15:51 AM PDT by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

When the government (Air Force, AEC, or other) said “national defense value,” I think they meant value in the sense of using what we had in our possession as a weapon or as an aid in developing weapons against our adversaries (Russia, China).


52 posted on 08/23/2022 11:04:58 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson