Posted on 08/20/2022 5:55:15 PM PDT by Qiviut
Let’s start with the fact the PFDA (the P is not a typo) asked a federal court for 75 years to make public the many thousands of pages of data submitted to them by Pfizer to support the EUA they (the PFDA) issued.
One interpretation of this action is that they wanted the data to stay hidden for a long time to hide fraud and/or criminality (same thing). The other is that they only had enough staff to complete this task within 75 years. Let’s ignore the 2nd one as absurd on its face (especially since they seem to be pouring out documents monthly after the judge ordered them to). Where there is a will there is a way apparently.
Now why would they want to keep the data hidden? What lies within the realm of possibilities is that at the time they went to court, they knew the EUA and the resulting massive national and global vaccine campaign were pre-determined and independent of whatever “science” emerged to support or not support the campaign. Unfortunately for them, the “science” was not supportive. At all. So they tried to suppress the serious troubling toxicity and lack of efficacy data contained within those documents.
Well the court ordered them to make public thousands of pages of documents each month. My hypothesis above seems to be validated by the uncovering of what is not just troubling, but absolutely terrifying data on the lack of safety in pregnancy. While Dr Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers recently corrected a report that overcounted miscarriages in one section of the Pfizer documents, they are right to have early and often called attention to signals about this issue overall. Indeed in May 2022, they broke the story of another section of the Pfizer documents, in which the mortality rate of fetuses and babies of women vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA injection was about 80 per cent.
Now, let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”
Looking at the first bullet under the header:
Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:
In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this:
270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, “no outcome was provided.” So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on?
My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were:
23 spontaneous abortions
2 spontaneous abortions with intra-uterine death
So, 25 of the 32 pregnancies with known outcomes resulted in a miscarriage, a rate of 78%. Note that miscarriage normally occurs in only 12-15% of pregnancies
2 premature births with neonatal death
1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death
1 normal outcome
Note that this only adds up to 29 known outcomes, but then they note that “two different outcomes were reported for each twin” and then they talk about “fetus/baby cases as separate from mother cases.” I have no idea how to interpret this explanation of outcomes, so it may have been one or two less (or more) deaths then.
So, of the 32 pregnancies they knew the outcome of, 87.5% resulted in the death of the fetus or neonate. Burying this data in the way and not alerting the world to what they found, is criminal activity yet again. This is what they do and have always done when one of their novel products begins to cause death. It is just these kinds of actions that hav resulted in the billions of criminal and civil fines they have paid in the last 20 years alone. They have done this with numerous newly launched medications such as Avandia, Bextra, Vioxx, and let’s not forget oxycodone. Many hundreds of thousands of deaths have resulted with the burying of adverse event and death data around newly launched products until they are caught, pay massive fines, and then carry on doing the same thing.
Check out this article reviewing their decades of criminality in which this quote appears:
While the defense industry used to be the biggest defrauder of the federal government under the False Claims Act (FCA), a law enacted in 1863 to prevent defense contractor fraud, the pharmaceutical industry has greatly overtaken the defense industry in recent years. The pharmaceutical industry now tops not only the defense industry, but all other industries in the total amount of fraud payments for actions taken against the federal government under the False Claims Act."
This one is bigger though. And maybe why I keep hearing of a bunch of folks now starting to short their stock as they see this fraud as potentially bankrupting these companies. Maybe, maybe not. They are really good at surviving their frauds and scandals.
Further, in looking at the Pfizer documents more broadly you find so many fragmentations and obfuscations of data in the way they present the data, combined with inexplicable categorizations of deaths as unrelated to the vaccine when they could never have known that (yet should have assumed it until proven otherwise). No wonder it takes an army of volunteers months to dissect and pull out what the actual data indicates.
Now, ignoring and obfuscating the massive toxicity to the fetuses of pregnant women exposed to the vaccine also has major implications on fertility.
And this is where it gets even more horrifying. Birth rates are plummeting in many countries around the world, but the way in which they are plummeting is unprecedented. They are large drops, and they are occurring, almost like clockwork, approximately 9 months after pregnant women around the world started to be vaccinated . This is occurring after women the world over were told it is “safe and effective” in pregnancy despite the fact the trials did not include pregnant women.
Yet, in the first 12 week post-vaccine rollout surveillance report submitted by Pfizer to the PFDA, of the 270 pregnancies reported, they followed 32 of them and found a horrifying rate of fetal/neonatal deaths. Again stirs up memories of one of the most historically shocking statements ever uttered by an FDA voting member, my “friend” Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of my favorite journal, the New England Journal of Medicine (this is a joke), “but we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.” Dr. Rubin and I have a little history. In a NY Times Magazine article which partly profiled me, he was quoted as saying I “got lucky” when I testified in the Senate on the critical need for corticosteroids in hospitalized COVID patients in May of 2020, months before Oxford’s trial made it the standard of care overnight.
Well they started giving it all right. Now let’s see if there are any data to suggest the vaccines are having an impact on birth rates. Note that although birth rates can vary from year to year, and have small peaks and valleys within the year, you don’t typically see large decreases suddenly from one month to the other, in numerous countries around the world. This data is even more horrifying, some of which I obtained from Peter Imanuelson’s Substack called the Freedom Corner with Peter Sweden.
In Stockholm during the first quarter of 2022, birth rates plummeted by 14%, shocking a Professor in Demographics:
"It is a drastic and remarkable reduction beyond the usual. We have never seen anything like this before, that the bottom just falls out in just one quarter" said Gunnar Andersson, professor in demographics at Stockholm University to Dagens Nyheter.
As someone who has been witness to massive censorship, much of it voluntary (i.e self-censorship), what the Professor says next is completely expected and in-line with what is now almost two years of many leading (cowardly) scientists, researchers and physicians who have willingly avoided making conclusions that might put the vaccines in a bad light, despite the immensely disturbing data on COVID vaccine toxicity screaming from VAERS, the life insurance industry, and disability statistics since the roll-out. Here is what he says in a newspaper interview:
"It correlates exactly in time with the mass vaccination program in April, May last year. People understood that the lock downs ended and now we had to go out in the world again. Demographists in other parts of Europe see the same timing" the professor said.
His interpretation is that lockdowns ended, vaccines were provided, thus giving everyone the freedom to start newly re-exploring the world instead of making babies? Although I find this almost too absurd to explore, I will say this: Sweden never really had any significant lock-downs. I am so sick and tired of hearing idiotic alternative explanations for truly disturbing data on the vaccines. Things like “anyone can put a report into VAERS”, or “working age people died at higher rates because of unemployment and deaths of despair.” Yet in 2021, lockdowns were over, unemployment rates were at historic lows, and drug overdoses have been on a fairly constant (but not precipitous) rise for years. I could go on, but you know what I am talking about, the constant explaining away of “inconvenient truths," with my personal favorite (favorite is not the right word), the explosion in articles about Sudden Adult Death Syndrome in trying to explain all the healthy, active young people dropping dead all over the world.
Now check out Germany’s first quarter births compared to the first quarter in previous years:
Switzerland data from the Swiss Policy Research Report here:
Hungary is down 20% since the vaccine roll-out and this massive decrease was addressed by one member of parliament is this widely circulated video from the RAIR foundation. Other reports are even more shocking: Taiwan is down 27%, UK, North Dakota are reporting 12-13% declines, and Norway 6.2%. Admittedly these are a subset of countries, this is not meant to be a comprehensive analysis globally, but the month to month drop still needs explaining.
Further, disastrous impacts on fertility should not come as a surprise. Although censored, many in my network were aware of massive Facebook groups of women reporting and discussing severe menstrual irregularities as a result of these “vaccines.” These groups were shut down by Facebook. Remember, the vaccination campaign had only one enemy: “vaccine hesitancy” and our Federal government paid $1 Billion to media companies to support a favorable view of the vaccines. Massive groups of women reporting severe menstrual irregularities would drive vaccine hesitancy, so such talk must be suppressed at all costs (or minimal cost to Facebook).
We knew about the University of Illinois researchers who were trying to survey 5,000 women to study the effects on menstruation and were besieged with over 30,000 responses in like a day or two. The results were disturbing (and were either explained away as temporary or just ignored).
Google searches find many dozens of articles actually addressing the widespread menstrual irregularities reported by women but always concluding the problems were transient/temporary. But never forget the inaction, ignoring, and suppression of these data by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). Never forget the Infectious Disease Society of America’s (IDSA) distortion and rejecting of the immense data supporting ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Never forget the American Neurological Association and American Heart Associations ignoring of the massive rises in strokes and heart attacks among young healthy people with no co-morbidities. Never forget the Deans of the nations’ 126 Academic Medical Centers who had to have been aware of what was happening in their University hospitals, yet said and did nothing. It is an endless list of leaders in Academic Medicine who either were cowardly or willfully complicit in the suppression and ignoring of these data or who simply fell victim to what should have been easily detectable propaganda.
I appreciate the efforts of some who explore alternative “hypotheses” to explain these suddenly dropping birth rates. Fine, prove them. Unless you can, as per the now ignored, but long standing regulatory standard, when a new medicine or device is introduced, you must first assume any adverse effects or deaths reported to be related to the intervention until proven otherwise. That is what I am doing here. We must assume the vaccines are impacting fertility unless some other provable or credible explanations for a sudden drop in month to month birth rates. So stop the shots until you can prove they are not (this would be the 189th reason to stop the shots).
Too many young people dying, too many becoming disabled, too many pregnancies resulting in fetal or neonatal death as above, and now we find out that if we continue with this vaccine obsession, they will not be replaced. This is a humanitarian catastrophe heaped atop the one caused by dangerous gain-of-function research. When will the world wake up to this rapidly unfolding horror? For those of us who know what is going on, it is hard not to feel helpless as we are forced to watch increasingly apparent and widespread needless death. But we will continue to try to get these truths out despite the massive censorship and propaganda overwhelming the globe. We have a moral and ethical obligation and take that responsibility seriously no matter what befalls us. Stop the vaccines, now. And if we can’t stop them, we must try to convince everyone we know to no longer agree to get vaccinated. Their lives and our future depend on it.
The Bar must be extremely low for you to claim “Dismantle”……..
If one of your peeps so much as punctuates you consider that victory.
You’re Not suppose to add real data to SubStack or Expose.UK articles.
Read them and say something cute like:
“€lot $hot”
“Safe and Effective”
“Fake Fauci Vaccines”
“Big Pharma”
“Nuremberg 2”
“So Sad”
“Pure Blood”
Then on the next Thread, repeat those same phrases.
Do this daily. Many times a day.
ROFL! Hey, don’t they make a bot for that?
A Bot?
And take away the only joy someone may have for the day as they guzzle?
I kinda do too. Then you could time travel back to Salem, Massachusetts in the 1600's.
There you go. All your shuffling about increased heart problems and shingles was a feint for you to attempt to gain some respectability after being a 'vax pimp' for so long.
The 'vax doomer bandwagon' will not 'peter out'. The stuff is poison, the results are undeniable, and you and your sorry ilk keep apologizing for it and dismissing it. We call that 'vax pimping' where I come from.
You try WAY too hard, by the way. Like it's your job.
Best you keep her name out your mouth. You are not worthy, male nurse. The ignorant should respect their betters.
And this VaxTurd (your latest love) tries so hard to be like her, but she is a shamble of disconnected thinking and overly verbose stale, transparent rhetoric. Just the type who you glom onto with your suck booty self.
You are a mental midget and a troll, which is why you got 86'd off the Q thread in the first place. And you are about as funny as Carrot Top, which is to say not funny at all.
But you seem nice.
Oh, no. On that other thread it was carnage. Poor VaxHerd was decimated. You could feel her seething. Now she is back for round two, spouting the same stuff and posting the same memes. Somebody musta gave her a pep talk at half-time, now she's back for more. Let's see if Grey Whiskers wants to put in the effort a second time.
And having you for backup only weakens her position, in case you were wondering.
#VaxHerdAndHerRetardedSidekick
Part of the lexicon now, rube. This is what your clot shots have wraught. The clot shots that you enable with your stubborn stupidity.
signed,
Bagster
The Pureblood
I do indeed yield to Ransomnote’s superior ability and trade craft to compile and post some of the most profound, insightful and impacting Bar Graphs, Charts, Pie Charts and Red paragraphs and sentences.
How dare you sir to deny me the sweet joy of broadcasting my love of her longggggg and colorful Thread Postings.
Good day.
#InAnotherTimeWeWouldDuel
#InAnotherTimeYouWouldLose
Pfizer and CDC, Fauci and the others there and the democrat party are evil. The news media could reveal all the horror done by them but they are run by evil people too.
All complicit & should be held accountable for crimes against humanity; however, I’m not holding my breath.
You mean they were all virgin births?
(Pro tip: men can’t get pregnant, either.)
Apparently the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services doesn't agree with you:
HHS Secretary Becerra Dodges Rep. Boebert’s Question On Whether ‘Men Can Get Pregnant’
And since you are slavishly toeing the party line on the clot shots...
Troll.
Yep, you can’t seem to make a single post without calling me a silly name like troll. Proud of yourself?
The rest of your post is nonsensical. Men don’t get pregnant and therefore don’t miscarry. Talk about your red herrings! This must be the reddest one ever.
The claim you are defending is that 78% of pregnancies among vaccinated women in 2021 ended in miscarriage. Yet you cannot credibly account for why the birth rate increased (albeit only slightly) for the first time in seven years in 2021.
The study had a bunch of pregnancies lost to follow up.
And there were 11 pregnancies lost, even though only 3 of the lost pregnancies we’re matched to a subject ID.
Poor tracking.
Pfizer should have (as if!) fired the researchers in that study and made a lot of noise about lousy record keeping.
To try to bury it, in the midst of all the other clot shot issues, to say nothing of the clot shots being unnecessary, let alone needing to beandatory — combined with obscene profits means that politically
, Pfizer was begging to get teamed.
As are the $hot $hill$.
Already addressed here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=247#247
And here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=198#198
Try to keep in mind this thread is about Korey’s claims, not Wolfe’s. You are mixing them up.
Again, I recommend some sleep and then coffee for you, and do mean that sincerely and kindly.
No, I'm ashamed of you; if you are even a US citizen.
The rest of your post is nonsensical. Men don’t get pregnant and therefore don’t miscarry. Talk about your red herrings! This must be the reddest one ever.P
Not a red herring; if you trust government officials like Pfauci and the CDC, you have no call to reject HHS, who can't come out and say men are unable to get pregnant.
The claim you are defending is that 78% of pregnancies among vaccinated women in 2021 ended in miscarriage.
Don't put words in my mouth, troll.
There are too many potential issues with the study, and with the jabs, to allow the generalization you just made.
Yet you cannot credibly account for why the birth rate increased (albeit only slightly) for the first time in seven years in 2021.
Break down the birth rate by age, ethinicity, legal immigrant/illegal immigrant/citizen, and jab status.
...and that's only the beginning.
Try harder, troll.
>>>>Re your “... if you are even a US citizen”<<<<
Of course I am. My ancestors on both sides came here in the 1600s (Jamestown and Massachusetts Bay Colony, to begin with) and fought in the Revolutionary War.
How about you? You a citizen?
>>>>Re your “Not a red herring; if you trust government officials like Pfauci and the CDC, you have no call to reject HHS, who can’t come out and say men are unable to get pregnant.”<<<<
Yes, of course it’s a red herring. I have repeatedly called out Fauci as a liar here on FR and you know it. I have also repeatedly stated that men can’t get pregnant.
But if you want to insist men can get pregnant, then it’s fine by me if we modify Korey’s claim to “78% of pregnancies end in miscarriage” and leave out the “women” part.
>>>>Re your “The claim you are defending is that 78% of pregnancies among vaccinated women in 2021 ended in miscarriage.” [this last quoting me]
“Don’t put words in my mouth, troll.
There are too many potential issues with the study, and with the jabs, to allow the generalization you just made.” <<<<<
Ah, but you did start out defending Korey’s claim that 78% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage in 2021. It’s quite plain to anyone reading this thread.
If you are now backing off defending Korey’s 78% claim, after consideration, that is a reasonable stance to adopt. So what exactly is your position now?
At least we are in agreement about “too many issues” with Korey’s numbers.
>>>>Re your “Break down the birth rate by age, ethinicity, legal immigrant/illegal immigrant/citizen, and jab status.”<<<<
I already provided a breakdown by ethnicity, etc. Now you want me to do more of your research for you?
I’m not the one making the extraordinary claim that 78% of pregnancies ended in miscarriage in 2021. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, yet you offer no proof at all. Why don’t you find whatever statistics you think will support your argument instead? I support my statements with references and links. You rarely do, and then it’s some meme featuring the likes of Naomi Wolfe.
Re your “...and that’s only the beginning. Try harder, troll.”
Ah, now we come to the heart of your tricks. Demanding more and more proof, none of which you will accept. Reminds me of the old “Ashli Babbitt isn’t really dead” conspiracy theory you guys were pushing, the one in the Sham Wow Guy video you kept posting over and over again here claiming she was a crisis actor, as were the EMTs and her family, the blood was fake, the window she tried to climb through was actually a “movie set window” installed the night before, etc.
When reasonable Freepers pointed out that she really was dead, those who defended the video demanded statements from her family as proof. When we provided quotes from her family, they dismissed them as “crisis actors” in on the plot and demanded notices of her funeral. When these were provided, they demanded photos of her memorial service. These, too, were duly provided, but were dismissed as “fake”. They then said they would only accept a death certificate. Well, I have never seen a death certificate published in the press. That just doesn’t happen and they knew it. If, by some miracle her death certificate had been published, they would have dismissed as being fake, too, of course.
Sorry,not playing that game again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.