(this is gonna be good)
*popcorn*
Posted on 08/20/2022 5:55:15 PM PDT by Qiviut
Hopefully someone will pay for the clot shot crimes... but there is so little regard for life now I am not sure. We live in dark disgusting times.
Yeah, usually, they are. A few more weeks, and he would have made it.
He’s with God now.
Precisely
Re: “The article states 78% but I have heard 44%?”
The 78% figure is incorrect for the following reason:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4087108/posts?page=9#9
At the end of the study, 238 of the women were still pregnant. Therefore no known outcome. Does any sane person believe that a 78% miscarriage rate could be missed or hidden? Was there a 78% reduction in births after the vaccine rollouts?
The 44% was from Naomi Wolfe’s “crowdsourced project” with her “researchers” going through the 30,000 pages of Pfizer documents. When she announced that “44% miscarried!” these “researchers” had supposedly found 22 miscarriages out of a total of 50 pregnant women. Trouble is, they double counted the miscarriages and made a wrong assumption about the total number of pregnant women.
They found a page with a table listing the 11 women who miscarried in the “all adverse events” section. And they found a page with the table listing those same 11 women in the “serious adverse events” section. Being lousy researchers, they failed to notice it was the same 11 women, same 11 miscarriages, and added the two tables together, claiming there were 22 miscarriages — but actually there were only 11.
They found a page with atable listing 50 women who became pregnant after the first dose and assumed this was the total number of pregnant women enrolled in the study, a wrong assumption. They also failed to notice that only 3 of the 11 women who miscarried are listed among the 50.
Therefore, there must be a table listing women who became pregnant at some other time which Naomi’s “researchers” have not found yet among the 30,000 pages. It is highly likely a number of women did not yet realize they were pregnant when they were enrolled in the study, and so were pregnant before receiving the first dose. The “missing” 8 women must be in this group, and hence are not on the list of 50 who became pregnant after receiving the first dose. (Note that pregnant women were excluded from the study, so these women would not have participated in the study had it been known they were pregnant at the time of enrollment.)
Why only 11 miscarriages, not 23? Likely because Naomi’s “researchers” only found pages from the earliest phase of the clinical trial so far. Just like they only found the page with only 50 pregnancies.
Others called her out on her errors, including this guy, who provides the pages and tables so you can see for yourself:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1559949374381244416.html
For more, see:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=200#200
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=198#198
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=247#247
Trick question: Pfizer TRIED to have the results sealed for 75 years.
So apparently they thought the results could be hidden.
Are you admitting Pfizer is crazy, troll?
My daughter bought the vaxx scam hook, line and sinker. She was totally vaxxed and boosted when my grandson was born in early February. He was full term but small and his lungs weren’t completely developed. He spent seven days in ICU. At six months his lungs are fine as is everything else. He’s still small but finally beginning to rapidly grow. The doctors have no explanation as to what happened. I will never stop worrying about what effects that damn poison will eventually have on both my daughter and grandson.
No, the FDA tried. Given the ridiculous errors/lies by vax doomer grifters Naomi Wolfe and Korey, I’m beginning to see why.
If the vaccines caused 78% of pregnancies to end in miscarriage, why were births up by 1% in 2021 instead of down by 78%?
You mean the FDA and not Pfizer pushed to have the laughably incomplete, full-of-adverse-events trials hidden for 75 years?
That's the exact opposite of their job.
If the vaccines caused 78% of pregnancies to end in miscarriage, why were births up by 1% in 2021 instead of down by 78%?
Because men don't have miscarriages, and illegal immigrants don't take the clot shot.
Troll.
That's the exact opposite of their job.
Yes, it was the FDA. Which is why the judge ruled in favor of the FOIA suit:
Because men don't have miscarriages, and illegal immigrants don't take the clot shot.
What have you been smoking?
Omg. I’m so sorry.
So they're doing the opposite of their job.
What have you been smoking?
Because men don't have miscarriages, and illegal immigrants don't take the clot shot.
What have you been smoking?
Nothing. But if you're now arguing that men DO have miscarriages, then you're the one smoking something...
Maybe you should have some coffee. Or try again tomorrow after getting some sleep.
When you do, consider again:
If the vaccines caused 78% of pregnancies to end in miscarriage, why were births up by 1% in 2021 instead of down by 78%?
Men have nothing to do with it. (Pro tip: men can’t get pregnant, either.)
Illegal immigrants likewise have nothing to do with it. How on Earth did these illegal immigrant births supposedly make up for a shortfall of 78% citizen births? Are you serious?
BTW, Hispanic births were up 2% in 2021 as compared to 2020, so there was no off-the-charts increase in Hispanic births. Nor was there a 78% decrease in births of non-Hispanic babies. Births of white babies increased by 2%. Births to black and Asian women declined by 2.4% and 2.5%, respectively, while American Indian/Alaskan Native women fell by 3.2%.
Correction (I’m tired):
If the vaccines truly caused 78% of pregnancies to end in miscarriages, that would translate to about 58% and 68% above the norm (as 10% to 20% normally result in miscarriage) among vaccinated pregnant women. Not all pregnant women were vaccinated, of course. The CDC estimates that slightly over 40% were fully vaccinated (two doses) by the end of 2021. No figures given as to how many had received a single dose.
Ok, because not all women took the clot shot and those who didn’t did what people do when everything is shut down and people are forced to stay home.
And even if 78% of the pregnancies did end in miscarriage, that means 21% didn’t and those women probably got pregnant again and carried to term.
You are being willfully obtuse.
(this is gonna be good)
*popcorn*
She discussed this publicly and made corrections on her website.
Yes, I noted not all pregnant women were vaccinated.
The thing is, everyone expected a mini baby boom in 2020 for that reason, but births went down slightly in 2020 from 2019 (an no vaccines yet). It appears that, as usual, people were less likely to want a baby during uncertain and difficult times. So, at least during the first three months of 2020, the lockdowns did not result in an increase in conceptions. It's thought the slight increase in births in 2021 was people making up for deciding to postpone having a baby in 2020.
And even if 78% of the pregnancies did end in miscarriage, that means 21% didn’t and those women probably got pregnant again.
This makes no sense. The 21% (actually 22%) who didn't miscarry after getting the vaccine got pregnant again? And somehow magically conceived again right after giving birth and magically had babies in record time within the 2021 calendar year?
I think you surely meant the 78% who miscarried got pregnant again?
Normally, women wait at least a few months before conceiving again:
There is no perfect amount of time to wait before trying to conceive again, but many healthcare providers encourage woman to wait at least a few months to strengthen the chance of a healthy pregnancy. If a woman’s body isn’t ready to support a pregnancy by the time that she conceives again, she faces an increased risk of experiencing a repeat miscarriage. It takes time for the uterus to recover and for the endometrial lining to become strong and healthy again.
Medically, it is safe to conceive after two or three normal menstrual periods if tests or treatments for the cause of the miscarriage are not being done. Some physicians routinely recommend that couples wait six months to a year before attempting another pregnancy in order to come to terms with their loss, whereas other physicians feel there is no compelling reason to wait so long.https://americanpregnancy.org/getting-pregnant/pregnancy-loss/pregnancy-after-miscarriage/
So, if you did mean that it was the 78% who miscarried immediately conceived again afterward, against all odds and medical advice, how were they able to deliver these babies before the end of 2021?
Maybe Naomi Wolfe was right about the vaccines enabling time travel:
How cool would that be? Now I wish I'd got vaccinated!
Yes, I noted that a correction had been made to her website after she got called out for the egregious errors. After she made her big announcement and got it featured on Will Witt’s website and dupes spread it all over social media.
I have not seen where she discussed the errors. Perhaps you would kind enough to supply a link?
The fact is, these were ridiculous glaring errors that were easy to spot. But then again, Naomi Wolfe is infamous for doing shoddy research.
After she was called out by her peers for shoddy research resulting in false conclusions in her own supposed field of expertise (radical feminism) beginning with her thesis and then one of her books, and her last book was so riddled with errors her publisher had to pulp all copies, she started jumping on passing bandwagons to get attention. First she veered right and went Tea Party. Then made a sharp left turn and went all in on Occupy Wall Street.
Along the way she started spouting nutty conspiracy theory stuff. For instance, she claimed that ghastly ISIS video showing them beheading the two Americans and two British was a fake created by the CIA and the poor headless guys and their families were all actors, and that American military sent to Africa to help out during the Ebola outbreak were actually being sent there to bring Ebola back to the US to start an epidemic here and topple the government.
Now she’s jumped on the vax doomer bandwagon. When this finally peters out, who knows, she may turn left again.
You ain’t got nuffin on Ransomnote!
She post the most beautiful charts and graphs with color combos that not only sooth but delight and strike hunger in ones’s eyes for more.
Just when you think Ransomnote’s graphs have reached the end of her long internet chomping thread…..BOOM! With perfect timing it’s a Pie Chart.
So don’t even pretend. No one can compare.
#Imitators
#NoCompetition
#NiceTryNot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.