Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatHerd; grey_whiskers
If the vaccines caused 78% of pregnancies to end in miscarriage, why were births up by 1% in 2021 instead of down by 78%?

Ok, because not all women took the clot shot and those who didn’t did what people do when everything is shut down and people are forced to stay home.

And even if 78% of the pregnancies did end in miscarriage, that means 21% didn’t and those women probably got pregnant again and carried to term.

You are being willfully obtuse.

35 posted on 08/20/2022 11:59:56 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; grey_whiskers; CatHerd
Woohoo! Grey Whiskers dismantles VaxHerd, part duex.

(this is gonna be good)

*popcorn*


36 posted on 08/21/2022 12:26:10 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Ok, because not all women took the clot shot and those who didn’t did what people do when everything is shut down and people are forced to stay home.

Yes, I noted not all pregnant women were vaccinated.

The thing is, everyone expected a mini baby boom in 2020 for that reason, but births went down slightly in 2020 from 2019 (an no vaccines yet). It appears that, as usual, people were less likely to want a baby during uncertain and difficult times. So, at least during the first three months of 2020, the lockdowns did not result in an increase in conceptions. It's thought the slight increase in births in 2021 was people making up for deciding to postpone having a baby in 2020.

And even if 78% of the pregnancies did end in miscarriage, that means 21% didn’t and those women probably got pregnant again.

This makes no sense. The 21% (actually 22%) who didn't miscarry after getting the vaccine got pregnant again? And somehow magically conceived again right after giving birth and magically had babies in record time within the 2021 calendar year?

I think you surely meant the 78% who miscarried got pregnant again?

Normally, women wait at least a few months before conceiving again:

There is no perfect amount of time to wait before trying to conceive again, but many healthcare providers encourage woman to wait at least a few months to strengthen the chance of a healthy pregnancy. If a woman’s body isn’t ready to support a pregnancy by the time that she conceives again, she faces an increased risk of experiencing a repeat miscarriage. It takes time for the uterus to recover and for the endometrial lining to become strong and healthy again.

Medically, it is safe to conceive after two or three normal menstrual periods if tests or treatments for the cause of the miscarriage are not being done. Some physicians routinely recommend that couples wait six months to a year before attempting another pregnancy in order to come to terms with their loss, whereas other physicians feel there is no compelling reason to wait so long.https://americanpregnancy.org/getting-pregnant/pregnancy-loss/pregnancy-after-miscarriage/

So, if you did mean that it was the 78% who miscarried immediately conceived again afterward, against all odds and medical advice, how were they able to deliver these babies before the end of 2021?

Maybe Naomi Wolfe was right about the vaccines enabling time travel:

How cool would that be? Now I wish I'd got vaccinated!

38 posted on 08/21/2022 5:39:00 AM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson