Skip to comments.
The Dubious and Doomed 'Assault Weapon' Ban That the House Approved Today May Cost Democrats This Fall
Reason ^
| 7.29.2022
| JACOB SULLUM
Posted on 07/31/2022 1:12:16 PM PDT by absalom01
The House of Representatives today approved H.R 1808, which would ban the production and sale of "assault weapons," including semi-automatic rifles with features such as pistol grips, folding or adjustable stocks, barrel shrouds, and threaded barrels. It also would ban a long list of specific models by name.
The bill, which passed the House by a vote of 217 to 213, has no chance in the evenly divided Senate, where support from at least 10 Republicans would be required to overcome a filibuster. House approval of H.R. 1808 is therefore a symbolic act aimed at energizing Democrats and encouraging them to vote in this fall's elections. But several House Democrats, whose objections nearly derailed today's vote, worried that it would hurt their party's candidates more than it would help them. In the end, five Democrats joined all but two Republicans in voting against the bill.
The fear that today's gesture could alienate more voters than it attracts seems rational given what happened after Congress approved similar legislation in 1994: Democrats lost control of the House and Senate. Polling data provide further reason to think that the House vote to revive the ban, which expired in 2004, could be politically perilous.
...
"Last time, we didn't necessarily define 'semi-automatic [assault weapon]' very well," Cooper told Politico. Nor does the new, supposedly improved version of the ban.
Like H.R. 1808, the 1994 ban covered a bunch of listed models, along with "copies" of them. Also like H.R. 1808, it included a more general definition of prohibited rifles, which hinged on the presence or absence of five features: a folding or telescoping stock, a pistol grip, a bayonet mount, a grenade launcher, or a "flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor." ..."
(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: assaultweapon; ban; banglist; guncontrol; house; hr1808
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Howie66
Well, he’s facing Marisa Wood in the general in November, who is a garden-variety Democrat pol.
This would have been a good year to mount a primary challenge, but there were problems getting credible candidates to run against him, in the re-drawn district.
He’s sketchy, for sure.
21
posted on
07/31/2022 1:47:14 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: piytar
Chris Jacobs NY 27th CD, a suburb of Rochester, and
Brian Fitzpatrick PA 1st CD, suburbs outside of Philly
22
posted on
07/31/2022 1:52:56 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
The guy who coined the term "assualt weapon", Josh Sugarmann of the "Violence Policy Center" did the left a solid by coming up with the catchy term that actually has no meaning. He didn't even invent it - he just translated the German word sturmgewehr
To: Chad C. Mulligan
Yeah, I hate to give that toad any credit, but he definitely understood the messaging needed at the time. He’s on record admitting he popularized the term to exploit the public’s confusion about fully-automatic and semi-automatic operation.
Just to further complicate things, this was roughly the same era when Jeff Cooper was loudly pointing out that, in his experience, you didn’t need full auto anyway. He may have gone a bit far with his “Scout” rifle concept, though there are those who continue consider it to be a realistic answer to a very difficult problem.
24
posted on
07/31/2022 2:23:42 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
It's hard to get gun owners to vote sometimes, but when we perceive that our rights are under active threat, we become the most motivated of voters. This November every legal gun owner in America should be at the polls on election day with four friends and every voting age member of their family. Every eligible voter should be voting against the Reps who voted yes on this bill.
How each representative voted is Here. If your representative is a Democrat you can save yourself some time, nearly all of them voted to take away your rights.
For those of us in New Hampshire both Kuster and Pappas voted against our 2nd amendment rights and they voted to destroy the jobs of hundreds of New Hampshire workers who depend on Ruger and Sig Sauer for their income. And that's not counting all the subcontractors, machine shops, and other businesses that depend on work from Ruger and Sig Sauer.
Talk to a friend, talk to your neighbors, volunteer to work as a poll watcher, and vote in November.
To: absalom01
“The Dubious and Doomed ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban That the House Approved Today May Cost Democrats This Fall”
If this headline was written in the United States, it should read:
“The unconstitutional scary rifle ban that the House approved today should cost democrats everything this Fall”
26
posted on
07/31/2022 4:26:47 PM PDT
by
Fireone
(When they pry them from my cold, dead, unvaccinated hands.)
To: absalom01
but when we perceive that our rights are under active threat, we become the most motivated of voters. No weapon forged against us shall prosper, as someone once said in a different context.
27
posted on
07/31/2022 4:35:07 PM PDT
by
firebrand
( )
To: absalom01
Nobody ever talks about gun grabber Mark Kelly in Arizona. He gets a free ride.
28
posted on
07/31/2022 4:58:08 PM PDT
by
Luke21
To: absalom01
Frankly, I don’t give a shit who replaces this gutless wonder. Hunter Biden would be a improvement.
29
posted on
07/31/2022 5:38:02 PM PDT
by
Howie66
(Let's Go Brandon!!)
To: absalom01
"Assault weapon" is a redundancy because
all weapons are made for assaulting. Bows & arrows, daggers, tomahawks, fish-knockers, brass knuckles, ... all assault weapons.
And these doofuses are too bog-ignorant of how firearms work (and in particular what makes them dangerous) to write effective law, witness all the AR-15s on the market (as well as those currently sold in Kommieforia) with little more than cosmetic changes to skirt the law.
And that's just a small sample. Franklin Armory, the eternal bane of the gun-grabbers, even makes an AR that isn't semi-auto!
There's no law they can write that can't be skirted, mostly because all they know about guns is that they're afraid of them.
To: absalom01
A lot of these right-wing journalists and commentators are smart folks.
Why do they, we and even those on this site, think that elections matter ?
They haven’t. And not in 2020. No, No democrat wins re-election without cheating.
It doesn’t matter if the people hate them or not. Pelosi has been a representative for CENTURIES and she will never lose - no matter how bad it gets.
Even Lori Lightfoot for god’s sake. She’s like a damned tick. All of the democrats are.
This is not about voting anymore. Hasn’t been for a long, long time.
31
posted on
07/31/2022 5:54:55 PM PDT
by
Celerity
To: absalom01
“Assault weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over
fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons
—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine
gun— can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on
these weapons.”
– Josh Sugarmann
32
posted on
07/31/2022 6:14:27 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(“Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms.” – Aristotl)
To: absalom01
Did you know that a musket is a weapon of war? Did you know that there is not an army in the world that uses an AR 15 as its rifle?
To: Celerity
Sorry, not buying any black pills tonight.
34
posted on
07/31/2022 6:52:34 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Why, yes. Yes, I did know that.
35
posted on
07/31/2022 6:54:24 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
NO chance? Remember the ‘red flag’ vote? The FIFTEEN Republicans who allied with the ‘rats? Never say never.
36
posted on
07/31/2022 6:56:40 PM PDT
by
who knows what evil?
(Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...siameserescue.org)
To: who knows what evil?
Yup. The RINOS need to be primaried. This is not a task for a single year, but for every election year hereafter.
The McConnel/Pense/Mittens wing of the part needs to be sent to Siberia, and new America first pols need to be put in their places.
And then the base needs to monitor these new pols, and eject them when they inevitably turn into traitors.
Rust never sleeps.
37
posted on
07/31/2022 7:02:10 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
“The guy who coined the term “assualt weapon”, Josh Sugarmann of the “Violence Policy Center”
Actually “assault rifle” is the English translation of the German word “sturmgewehr”.
38
posted on
07/31/2022 7:02:15 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
To: absalom01
They don’t care if it costs them votes if they can pass it. They know they will get back in to power again and they control the bureaucrats. It is one step closer to their ultimate goal of “disappearing” we deploreable enemies.
39
posted on
07/31/2022 7:09:44 PM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
To: Jim Noble
Stipulated. I should have been more precise.
Sugarmann, and his excrable “Violence Policy Center” who popularized the term in the early 90’s when California and then Congress were banning semi-automatic center fire rifles.
“Self loading (semi-automatic) centerfire rifle” just didn’t have the panache that “Assault Weapon” had, and still has.
The VPC have taken a lower profile in recent years, yielding the stage to the newer anti-gun groups, but they continue their practice of generating phony “studies” culled from newspaper accounts then then get recycled and retailed by the corporate media, Democrat pols, and other bad actors.
He frankly deserves more notoriety than he currently recieves.
40
posted on
07/31/2022 7:14:03 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson