Politico is unhinged.
He's a transphobe.
“I don’t know what to say.”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I do.
What the writer doesn’t realize is that after the Left makes abortions legal, and forced abortion of those with “genetic defects” mandatory, they will be coming after those like him to “reduce the burdens to society”.
I think he wants to create a whole bunch of babies in a laboratory environment, sort through them while they are at the zygote stage, and kill the ones who are “genetically defective”.
He can get his vas deferens clipped and for a few days take pain killers and keep frozen peas in his pants. Then after that he doesn’t have to worry about passing on his genes when he takes off his jeans.
Proof that there are just some people in this world who should not be allowed to procreate?
So he knows he has a “genetic condition” but still attempts to pro-create? But if he could kill a child because of the assumption of passing on this “flawed gene” then he’d be happier?
Who comes up with this twisted evil crap?
What kind of sick person thinks this way?
What are they going to do with the child after it is born if it develops some sort of defect?
Never mind, I think I know.
The human race depresses me some days.
Has this man and his wife ever heard of ADOPTION? I feel sorry for any future children this couple may have. Dad is dumb as dirt and wimpy as hell!
He is the son of Ben Bradlee and Sally Quinn of WaPo fame.
Chop your balls off instead of creating and murdering unborn babies then.
I personally have a more nuanced view of abortion. I certainly don’t think it should be used as just another form of birth control as it is being done today. But there is the issue that most birth defects cannot be detected until like 4 months. There are some birth defects so severe and frightening that makes me wonder whether it might be more merciful to end the pregnancy in certain extreme cases. On the other hand many born with such birth defects would still choose life for themselves despite the hardship they face. So I’m rather torn on this issue, and don’t really have a strong position on these cases one way or another, and am more inclined to let the parents make that decision.
Some things are not meant to be.
Deal with it.
The better question would be: "If abortion had been legal when you were born, would it have been appropriate for your mother to have aborted you?"
In the secular world we live in, if we can accommodate more people than we disadvantage that is a win.
Certainly babies that have been born since the end of Roe would see things differently than you do.
At least you have choices. Murdered babies don’t.
They don’t have a counter where you can return your baby if you aren’t satisfied with her? I mean, the baby should be under warranty.
IVF is not abortion and it’s that simple.
Projecting limits on abortion to the notion of IVF being disallowed is a straw man argument. It’s a phony argument trying not to protect IVF but to protect abortion.
I do! This is called “evolution in action”.