Posted on 07/15/2022 8:52:24 AM PDT by grundle
After the 2020 Election steal, we knew things were very wrong. Now as experts dig into the 2020 Election results, the final results don’t seem to reconcile with anything.
We learned in 2020 that American elections are a mess. Now here we are a year and a half later and we are uncovering more evidence that the final results in 2020 never should have been certified.
We reported within days of the election and since then that the final numbers made no sense. This was highlighted in our work surrounding the Drop and Roll.
Video: Drop and Roll' - How The 2020 Election Was Stolen From Donald Trump
https://rumble.com/vb8ksn-drop-and-roll-how-the-2020-election-was-stolen-from-donald-trump.html
The Edison data used in the above video has since been dug into much deeper. Draza Smith and Jeff O’Donnell are two data experts who began looking at this data. They made numerous observations after doing so as noted in the article below. Some key points are:
Edison data with state totals are provided to mainstream media outlets like the New York Times showing reportedly up-to-date results of the election for each state
There is a separate stream of election data based on county reporting that goes to the state
The Edison state data supplied to the media and the county data supplied to the state don’t mirror each other and don’t agree until very late in the process – these results should mirror each other at all times accounting for timing issues
During the 2020 Election, all Edison data results for all states went to zero, and then when the numbers were reported again the Edison state data showed that President Trump had lost votes in many states. It appears that this ‘Edison zero’ event was done to make it look like President Trump was doing worse in several states
The Edison state data and county data cannot be reconciled
Edison’s State data was always below the county data (except with DC)
Ultimately both the Edison state data and the county data come to an agreement at the end of the election
The Edison state data appears almost completely fictional to paint a story to the public
The county data may be fictional as well to some extent but not as off as Edison state data.
Edison data reporting is most likely related to an algorithm or pre-determined value
Battleground states actually had more refined reporting down to the precinct level rather than county level as in other states
The ratio of Trump to Biden votes in the Edison data appears preset for each state before the election
But when Texas and then Florida went to Trump voting had to stop while they rearranged the remainder of the swing state votes
The Edison zero moment occurred after Florida was called for Trump
All states show this pattern
There may be some type of controller that manages the votes – a device similar to ones used in multiple industries
Jeff O’Donnell “I have probably done a fairly deep dive on 12 different states and I have found unacceptable, unacceptable things in all 12. Even in my worst nightmares previous to this election, I never dreamed that anything like this on such a massive scale could happen. We need answers to so many questions.”
Draza Smith shared: “Everything we’ve put together with the idea of how things happened here, played out exactly the same way in the California recall election. Why did all those people…go in and vote and be told, oh you can’t vote, you’ve already cast a vote…So the things that we’re seeing happening are falling into line that it’s the same, it’s the same, it’s the same. We need to start demanding the answers as to why the same, the same, the same.”
We need an audit of our time stamps. We need to get a better idea of how a ballot goes from the voter, to the tabulator, to the state and Edison and eventually to the New York Times.
Based on personal experience, having performed hundreds of audits around the world, when performing an audit of any data set, you want to make sure your data is complete. You can do this by reconciling your data to reported results.
The county results reported in the Edison data don’t agree with the state results. They should. So another data set to compare these results to was needed. This is where ‘Cast Vote Records’ come in.
“Cast Vote Records” are inventories of votes recorded in the voting system. These records can be downloaded onto a spreadsheet and they show all votes for each ballot counted in the election through the election system. Each row represents each ballot tabulated in the election and which tabulator it was cast on, what image number it was given, what type of vote it was, ballot type or precinct, and what all the votes were for the races on that ballot.
Below is an example of a Cast Vote Record report provided by Erin Clements from the New Mexico audit. Each row in the spreadsheet represents a ballot with the votes for each ballot:
Unfortunately, and perhaps by design, the Cast Vote Records do not include time stamps for when the ballots were cast or tabulated. The Cast Vote records in the order they are provided from the voting system do not agree with the Edison data.
Numerous states were reviewed and none of the Cast Vote Records for any state agreed with the results for the state reported through Edison.
Erin Clements shared that the order of the votes in the Cast Vote Record is impossible to achieve in most counties. Votes are clearly being shuffled and possibly made up altogether. Small, red counties don’t necessarily show shuffling, but ballot stuffing in absentee ballots for some races usually pops out.
It is also impossible to tie the order of the votes in the CVR to the election night reporting we saw on TV. It may be because TV reporting is almost completely made up? Draza Smith and Jeff ODonnell have shown that the election night reporting appears to be based solely on the number of ballots that are reported at any given time with ratios of votes reported using an algorithm to manipulate the public’s perception of how the election is going.
To understand this, it’s helpful to look at Rhode Island’s data because it’s the only state that processes its entire election on one computer, so all the ballots are stored in one Cast Vote Record. These graphs are from Draza Smith. The first graph represents what was reported on TV with a huge jump in Biden votes after Florida was called for President Trump.
The Cast Vote Records show a different picture. These charts should agree.
According to the Edison data charts President Trump was in the lead all night, then there was a massive injection of Biden votes after Florida was called for Trump – just like we saw in MI, PA, GA, etc.
When taking the records as stored in the state’s Election Management System (EMS) you’ll notice that the Biden votes that were injected at the end of counting on TV are now spread out so it doesn’t look like there was a massive Biden ballot dump.
If elections were honestly counted, reported, and recorded, then the two plots would have the same shape. But they don’t. In Rhode Island, it looks like the elections system software shuffled the last-minute stuffed votes into the record to spread them out and make them look natural. So if anyone checks the Cast Vote Record later, it won’t look like obvious ballot stuffing.
This was found to be the same in multiple states and in all the records reviewed. None of the Cast Vote Records agreed with the Edison data.
At this point – in the 2020 Election the Edison data that was used to report the status of the election results across the country, can’t be reconciled to anything.
There has been more than enough evidence to look at the ballots and signatures and canvas and machines. No one did anything because most all are in on it. Will take a very brave few to stand up. Then find judges to look at it to see it. Do that and you will find huge fraud..
This stuff is hard for me to comprehend. Does it confirm Mike Lindell’s theory? Does it conflict? or is it completely different data?
“They learned that they can steal a national election and the controlled opposition will shrug and do nothing. Expect more of the same.”
The other obvious stolen Presidential Election was JFK’s (Chicago’s graveyard vote and corrupt Dem Texas Pols). Nixon was told to keep his mouth shut. When Nixon finally won, he won by the most electoral votes in history (at the time).
Likely stealing elections is over a century old. The voters of the United States never had a chance.
In 2020, Republicans tended to vote in person. Democrats tended to vote by mail, and the mail-in votes took longer to count, meaning they'd be reported later. Again, that makes cheating more possible, probably more likely, but it doesn't prove it.
Trump wasn't going to carry Rhode Island anyway. More people live in the cities (Democrat) than in the country (Republican).
You are,correct, the 2020 presidential election was riddled with FRAUD.
AND STOLEN.
If nothing else there should be one mandatory rule- tabulated results should be auditable buy anyone at any time, or the results are invalid.
Try going to the IRS with records this bad...
our local paper refused to even mention the fraud but was so biased that in a sole article about the allegations they used the word "baseless" in the title....
I called them on it....how does a paper put their opinion in the title of news article.
Guess what, the truth is!
I heard last night, Mike Lindell, on Flashpoint, that the Wisconsin Supreme Court declared that the 2020 election had fraud and that it evidently goes to the Secretary of State to declare electorial votes be rescinded....
hope I got that right....!!
I have followed the issue very closely even before the 2020 election.
They were able to do what they did because of Covid. It was the same game but a much much bigger version of it with mail-in ballots and drop boxes due to lock-downs.
They were also able to do this because the GOP/RNC for years failed to demand that it be cleaned up AND because GOPe types (like in GA) allowed state election laws to be violated.
We don’t hear much reporting on the subject but in just about every state there is some effort to clean up our elections. I would say it is an international embarrassment for our country, but it was all quite intentional.
We are beginning to win court battles on the subject too, in many states. When you say that on FR people are understandably angry because they want the prior election overturned but that is not going to happen. However, courts are beginning to recognize that what they did in the 2020 election violated state laws.
I don’t know that it will make a huge difference in California, Washington, or Oregon, but there are certainly more eyes (and potentially undercover reporters) present.
All we can do is wait and see, but I do believe it is fair to point out that they woke a lot of people up who ARE involved in the process.
Probably because the Edison data is meaningless except for early count reporting on TV. It could be off by 50% and have no impact on the results of the election.
I hope so also. When bannon was covering the fraud he was saying Wisconsin would be perhaps the easiest state to flip. Once they start they could fall like dominoes. I notice that Steve bannon doesn’t cover it much anymore. Maybe a lawsuit or something. Some action in Arizona also.
“By who?”
The Republican Establishment at the time (likely some powerful dems also, they are team afterall).
No no no. You take it to the New York Post and the Washington Times for any chance of actual reporting. Otherwise you're writing a letter to Santa.
So, it really doesn’t matter?
I don't know about that but it had no impact on the vote totals and it doesn't rate a HUGE ELECTION UPDATE.
Where is Jima' when you need him?
If we no longer have fair elections, just imagine what type of corrupt idiot we can have elected President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.