Posted on 07/12/2022 4:32:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
None of the US airlines are screening their pilots for cardiac issues, but they all say that safety is their top priority. They won't screen pilots because they know what they will find.
In light of the new epidemic of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), I find it odd that there isn’t any airline, anywhere in the world, screening their pilots for cardiac issues. How can that be?
There is a very inexpensive test, from Heart Care Corp, that can be used to screen a pilot for cardiac issues. The test takes only 10 minutes per pilot, it is non-invasive (it is similar to an EKG), and the cost is extremely low. The results are more definitive than other tests, such as a cardiac MRI, that are much more expensive, time-consuming, and invasive. Check out this comparison chart. It’s a very impressive new technology.
My offer… any takers?
I am willing to personally help defray the costs of screening all of an airline’s pilots. My offer is only to the first airline willing to screen all their pilots and release the aggregated results of the screening test to the public so that the public realizes just how “safe” (or not) the COVID vaccines are.
If I’m really a misinformation spreader, then I will be spending money to prove I’m wrong. What airline could resist that?
On the other hand, if the vaccines were really safe, Pfizer, Moderna, the CDC, and the White House would all be literally throwing money at the airlines to do this screen, wouldn’t they? And the FAA would be requiring the screen.
But they aren’t.
That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?
They aren’t because they know the failure rate would be astronomical and it would show that:
A large number of pilots would be disqualified to fly making it impractical for airlines to operate
The airlines have been operating in an unsafe manner all this time
The CDC has been lying to the world about the actual rates of myocarditis which are much higher than they are telling people. For example, the CDC never multiplies the VAERS rates of myocarditis by the VAERS under-reporting factor (URF). They know it is unethical not to do that, but nobody on any of the outside committees ever brings this up because they are all in on the scam. In all my surveys of Americans, the rates of myocarditis are well over 1 in 100 vaccinated people. In my latest survey, the rate was 2.6%, which is more than 500 times higher than the CDC claims.
Any takers on my offer?
I didn’t think so.
Here’s a comment from a retired airline pilot:
I’m a retired airline pilot. Paying for the screenings will never be enough. Someone will have to guarantee lost salaries. Pilots will never agree to screenings unless they are made whole financially - meaning that if heart issues are discovered they will still receive their salary until retirement age. Even getting long term disability at 60% Of their salary will not induce their cooperation with this screening. Most airline pilots have loss of license insurance. The FAA mandated twice yearly health screenings significantly increase the risk of loss of license. These screenings, because they would reveal the extent of pilots with heart issues would bankrupt the insurance companies. As you stated in your post, the airlines will never agree as it will bankrupt them. The FAA nor any other government agency will agree as it will reveal their massive lies and failures. This would bring the nation to its knees economically, socially, and structurally. Dominoes would fall in every industry, including healthcare. Thus we will be stuck with a pandemic of people pretending not to know things.
>> In light of the new epidemic of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)
Bogus inventions shouldn’t be legitimized.
” The test takes only 10 minutes per pilot, it is non-invasive (it is similar to an EKG”
I think most commercial pilots get an EKG twice a year.
Correct. Class I fight physicals test for cardiac issues.
Did anyone get the screenshot of the person claiming there will be “an event” soon regarding the failure of airlines to adequately staff pilots, and this will be an excuse for a travel lockdown? Thy said it better than I did, and it makes more sense from them, but...
They already made it so the vaxx makers can’t be sued. What more does anyone need to know?
“They already made it so the vaxx makers can’t be sued.”
They can be sued.
Since when?
(claiming there will be “an event” soon regarding the failure of airlines to adequately staff pilots, and this will be an excuse for a travel lockdown?)
I guess I missed that but then I don’t know what happened with the Georgia Guidestones either.
Haven’t had a chance to catch up.
Anyone capable of using Google will know this is already part of a Class 1 Medical and just another bogus fearporn post.
Never going to happen. No commercial pilot who hasn’t already been diagnosed is going to risk losing his livelihood by volunteering for a test that might cost him his flight physical.
This is a BS post. As a pilot, I can tell you that if the FAA even suspects you have a cardiac issue during a flight physical, you will be grounded until you are run through the ringer. As I recall, Class I pilots require a physical every 6 months, or when anything happens that the FAA thinks physical condition could play a role.
Their top priority should be to provide a generous return to their shareholders.
It was a 4chan post, OR something similar.
Ping
Class 1 medicals require a physical every six months if you're over 40, under 40 is every year. An EKG is required every year, I just had mine two days ago.
I really wish people would quit posting BS articles like this on Freerepublic. It undermines our credibility when people post garbage like this as fact. Fake news is the territory of leftists, not decent people.
🤔🤔🤔
Being a pilot does not say how much medical knowledge you have.
Having heart problems I too am required to get an EKG every 6 months. They tell that you currently are not having problems or is your heart is so massively damaged. They do little for knowing if you will have problems tomorrow from damage that don’t show symptoms currently.
But it does say what knowledge I have regarding how the FAA reacts to any perceived cardiac issues,and not just those found in an EKG. I speak from first-hand experience.
And this is exactly where we are. But to be truthful, wouldn't a screening of ANY of the population give the same results expected of the airline pilots?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.