Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Manchin and Susan Collins accuse Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch of misleading them about Roe v. Wade when the senators voted to confirm them
Daily Mail UK ^ | June 25, 2022 | Ronny Reyes

Posted on 06/24/2022 11:51:44 PM PDT by Morgana

U.S. Senators Joe Manchin and Susan Collins slammed Supreme Court Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch for their votes in overturning Roe v Wade on Friday.

The senators had voted to confirm the Donald Trump appointed justices despite fears that they would overtrun the landmark abortion ruling, with the senators saying at the time that they trusted Kavanaugh and Gorsuch to uphold the law.

Now Collins, a Republican, and Manchin, a Democrat, are accusing the justices of misleading them as they criticized the court's 5-4 ruling to end women's federal right to an abortion.

'This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon,' Collins said in a statement.

Manchin echoed the outrage, saying: 'I trusted Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh when they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent and I am alarmed they chose to reject the stability the ruling has provided for two generations of Americans.'

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: abortion; didyousearch; prolife; roevswade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
I heard something about this with Joe tonight on the phone. WVa needs rid of Joe he flip flops on abortion too much.
1 posted on 06/24/2022 11:51:44 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

You mean like dummy Ruth Ginsberg of Ruth Sent Me fame misled Congress during her confirmation hearing that she had an open mind when it came to the abortion issue. Of course, no one believed the lying sleazebag anyway.


2 posted on 06/24/2022 11:55:57 PM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

they’re not supposed to even ask questions which will even indicate how they will rule.


3 posted on 06/24/2022 11:57:22 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Roe v Wade was not precedent in fact....Precedent lay with the states. And at one point, abortion was illegal in every state.


4 posted on 06/24/2022 11:58:42 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

When you scratch the surface, Manchin always was and always will be a Democrat whose hands are tied in a Republican state from doing wildly progressive things. West Virginia needs to get rid of him. A Republican senator replacing him will avoid all the drama of whether he will be voting with the Republicans or Democrats on the really important fiscal issues.


5 posted on 06/25/2022 12:01:24 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Don’t worry, I’m going to write them a letter saying “tough titties”.


6 posted on 06/25/2022 12:01:32 AM PDT by Bullish (Rot'sa ruk America. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

They are liars. The left has vehemently ruled that NO LITMUS TESTS are allowed in Senate confirmation questioning.


7 posted on 06/25/2022 12:07:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Does Sen Manchin want the long standing precedent of Roe v Wade restored?

The lefties had no problem reversing Bowers v Hardwick


8 posted on 06/25/2022 12:09:41 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (What was 35% of the Rep. Party is now 85%. And it’s too late to turn back—Mac Stipanovich )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Just the day before, some female argued that gun control was legal because they used single shot muskets in 1787. In 1787, abortion was illegal in every state of the United States.


9 posted on 06/25/2022 12:21:42 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

I agree and I’m sick of him


10 posted on 06/25/2022 12:50:00 AM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Voted for gun control too. Just like Sinema. All Democrats and a third of the Republicans suck.


11 posted on 06/25/2022 12:54:19 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“…the stability the ruling has provided for two generations of Americans.’

Interesting choice of words.. what about the lost generations of aborted babies?


12 posted on 06/25/2022 12:55:25 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

There’s some serious damage control.


13 posted on 06/25/2022 1:37:25 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckee

Voters there are largely dumber than a box of rocks. WV has similiar proprietary politics like Kentucky. They still think it is 1935 and they want both guns AND food stamps.


14 posted on 06/25/2022 2:29:30 AM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chuckee
they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent

They were simply telling the truth. They believed then that Roe vs. Wade was settled legal precedent just as they believed that Plessy vs. Ferguson was settled legal precedent before it was properly reversed.

So what.


15 posted on 06/25/2022 2:32:37 AM PDT by nathanbedford (Attack, repeat, attack! - Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Their opinion “Evolved”. Whats wrong with that Joe? Obviously your Religion “Evolved”!!! One day you will answer for that!


16 posted on 06/25/2022 3:41:52 AM PDT by southernerwithanattitude (New and Improved Redneck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

So privately Senators are asking for specific vote guarantees when interviewing nominees, then expecting that the USSC Justices must hold ever after to what they understood such promises to entail?

Somehow that’s not how I read the Constitution.


17 posted on 06/25/2022 3:46:24 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

*If that is what is going on, I’d suggest the much ballyhooed, private, office-by-office “meetings” of nominees with individual Senators be ended, and all such “meetings” be part of the public hearing process.


18 posted on 06/25/2022 3:48:01 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Well, at the time, it was settled law.

Now it is not.

See how easy that is !


19 posted on 06/25/2022 4:08:54 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (Super, Duper, Ultra Maga, subject of the Ultra Maga King Donald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I remember well, Joe Manchin won his first election by touting his 2nd Amendment support. So, Joe, who is the real deceiver in all of this?


20 posted on 06/25/2022 4:19:27 AM PDT by odawg ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson