Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas says court should 'now reconsider' gay marriage and contraception in wake of Supreme Court decision to overrule Roe v Wade
Daily Mail UK ^ | June 24, 2022 | Alex Hammer

Posted on 06/24/2022 2:08:55 PM PDT by Morgana

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas revealed he has laws protecting gay marriage and contraception in his sights, after axing Roe v. Wade.

Following Friday's landmark decision, Thomas called on his fellow jurists to overturn previous rulings that followed similar legal precedent.

The prospective law changes, released in a concurring opinion of the decision penned by Thomas, would see limits put on gay marriage, same-sex sexual activity, and citizens' access to birth control.

It comes as the Supreme Court controversially elected to strike down Roe v. Wade, a nearly 50 year-old decision that granted women the constitutional right to abortion.

In his separate opinion also released Friday, Thomas - the court's longest-serving justice - welcomed the guidance, but noted how it falls short of addressing citizens rights' apart from abortion.

The 74-year-old justice, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, went on to declare the court should reconsider other cases that fall under previous due process precedents.

Thomas' argument was entrenched in the belief that since the Constitution’s Due Process Clause was found not to secure a right to an abortion in Friday's ruling, the court should apply that same logic to other landmark cases.

He cited three in particular - including 1965's Griswold v. Connecticut, which allowed for married couples to buy and use contraception, and 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges, which allowed same-sex couples to legally marry.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; prolife; roevswade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2022 2:08:55 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Yes they should. Nothing in the Constitution provides for it.


2 posted on 06/24/2022 2:10:53 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

And it is a tool of oppression, child abuse, and religious persecution just as predicted. Also destroying women’s rights by defining them out of existence.


3 posted on 06/24/2022 2:11:47 PM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It looks like Roberts might have lost the rest of the court to Thomas. We might be in for a flood of conservative decisions.


4 posted on 06/24/2022 2:11:52 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

all MADE UP LAW by the court needs to be thrown out and the issues decided by OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES!


5 posted on 06/24/2022 2:12:44 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

He is absolutely right, God bless him. The enemies of America will probably assassinate him...like they did Scalia...


6 posted on 06/24/2022 2:13:43 PM PDT by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle
Now that Dobbs is settled law, shouldn't Roberts come on board, stare decisis and all?
7 posted on 06/24/2022 2:15:23 PM PDT by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: struggle

As far as I am concerned; Thomas should be the chief justice.


8 posted on 06/24/2022 2:15:34 PM PDT by Jean2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

He’s right. The states can “consider” these things on their own.

People can advocate for one side or the other, they may hit compromises, you never know how it will turn out. But all of this will mean the actual citizens getting on board with it - or not. So now it’s up to the citizens.


9 posted on 06/24/2022 2:19:07 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Certainly gay marriage that was definitely legislating from the bench. The claim that the state has zero interest in upholding traditional marriage was abhorrently wrong.

What’s the contraception ruling? I don’t remember that.


10 posted on 06/24/2022 2:20:51 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I don’t think Thomas said this...


11 posted on 06/24/2022 2:21:14 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Return these issues to the states!
Make The Tenth Amendment Great Again!


12 posted on 06/24/2022 2:22:06 PM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

No he didn’t.

This headline is a lie.


13 posted on 06/24/2022 2:22:12 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
I don't know about contraceptives.

But I'm tired of hearing about guys in the girl's bathrooms...and messing with the sports...and all the other crap these "whatevers" are pulling.

14 posted on 06/24/2022 2:23:53 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Well I think Congress would move to protect the sale and use of contraceptives.

Gay marriage was a totally baseless decision, a gift to Kennedy’s gay mentor.


15 posted on 06/24/2022 2:24:56 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: struggle
Gotta love Justice Thomas - he's one of our nations Jewels!


16 posted on 06/24/2022 2:26:28 PM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

They better do it quick. if the rats still run the senate after the midterms they will try and pack the court to prevent the next Roe case from losing.


17 posted on 06/24/2022 2:27:49 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Yeah, someone needs to send the gay marriage one up to them and have them reject it.

Just for the hell of it.


18 posted on 06/24/2022 2:29:50 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: caww
In his concurring opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade he wrote: "We have a duty to 'correct the error.'".....official opinion calling for the court to consider overturning gay marriage eetc..p>


19 posted on 06/24/2022 2:32:01 PM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I STILL can’t believe the supreme court declared same sex marriage legal!

The thing is, EVEN IF YOU SUPPORT gay people being able to marry... you shouldn’t support the court just MAKING UP THE RIGHT!!!

If the constitution is silent on an issue, it should be up to the states.

I WOULD HAVE NO ISSUE WITH ALL 50 STATES saying gay marriage is ok, if that is what the people representatives pass into law in each state. But I absolutely 100% am against the supreme court MAKING LAW!

They are NOT ELECTED! and should NOT have that power.


20 posted on 06/24/2022 2:32:35 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson