Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert B. Reich: Why the January 6 committee is failing to slow Trump’s attempted coup
Hartford Courant ^ | 6/20/2022 | Robert B. Reich

Posted on 06/21/2022 11:19:09 AM PDT by Signalman

We fool ourselves if we believe that the televised hearings of the January 6 committee are changing the direction of the Republican Party, or that the hearings will end the attempted coup that Trump launched immediately after the 2020 election. The GOP is becoming ever more divorced from reality. Trump’s attempted coup continues unabated.

The first three hearings of the House January 6 committee demolished the myths of voter fraud repeated incessantly by Trump and his supporters and amplified by Republicans in Congress. A parade of Republican witnesses -- including his attorney general William Barr, Ivanka Trump, and his own campaign lawyers -- testified that they knew Trump lost the election, and told him so. Trump was also informed that the demands he was making of his Vice President Mike Pence to block his defeat were illegal.

Yet the Republican response to those hearings has ranged from indifference to hostility. Representative Kevin McCarthy, the Republican leader of the House, wrote on Twitter that the members of the committee “will not stop lying about their political opponents,” and he calls the committee “despicable.”

On Friday, speaking at the Faith and Freedom Coalition conference in Nashville, Trump repeated his Big Lie -- as if the hearings never happened -- and once again berated Pence, charging that his former Vice President “did not have the courage to act” in trying to unilaterally reject the Electoral College votes that were being cast for Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Why aren’t the hearings slowing the Big Lie or Trump’s continuing attempted coup?

First, the Lie is now fully entrenched in the Republican Party, a central tenet of GOP dogma. It has become the vehicle by which Republican candidates signal their fealty both to Trump and to a broad range of grievances -- some imaginary, some derived from the so-called “culture wars” -- that now constitute the Republican brand.

So far, at least 108 Republican candidates who embrace the Big Lie have won their nominations or advanced to runoffs, and there is no sign that the hearings have reduced the intensity of their demagoguery. Voters have chosen eight Big Lie candidates for the U.S. Senate, 86 Big Lie candidates for the House, five Big Lie candidates for governor, four for state attorney general and one for secretary of state.

In Michigan, the Republican race to challenge Governor Gretchen Whitmer is led by Ryan Kelley, a real estate broker who was arrested this month and charged with participating in the January 6 assault on the Capitol. Republican nominee for Michigan attorney general Matthew DePerno led a November 2020 lawsuit over an election night tabulation error in Antrim County that Trump supporters have seized on in their efforts to perpetuate unfounded claims of fraud. (DePerno has promised to lead criminal investigations of alleged fraud in 2020 despite the conclusion by Republican state senators that his allegations are “demonstrably false.”) Secretary of state nominee Kristina Karamo served as an observer in Detroit during the 2020 absentee ballot count and claimed, without evidence, that she had witnessed fraud.

In Arizona, the leading Republican candidate for governor, Kari Lake, has made the stolen election claims central to her campaign. Mark Finchem, a candidate for secretary of state, was at the front steps of the Capitol on January 6. And Blake Masters, who aims to challenge incumbent Democrat Senator Mark Kelly, says without evidence that “one-third of the people outside the Capitol complex on January 6 were actual F.B.I. agents.”

In Pennsylvania, Republican senate candidate Mehmet Oz has embraced the Big Lie. Gubernatorial nominee Doug Mastriano also asserts it, and has said that the Republican-controlled legislature should have the right to take control of the all-important choice over which presidential electors to send to Washington.

Big Lie nominees for statewide office in swing states also include Herschel Walker for Senate in Georgia and Burt Jones for Georgia lieutenant governor.

Secondly, the hearings have not affected the Republican Party (and are unlikely to) because Big Lie candidates are under no pressure to respond to the findings of the committee. Their districts or states already lean Republican, and most voters in them have dismissed or aren’t paying attention to the committee hearings.

Recall that the 2020 election was mainly about Trump. You were either for him or against him. Voters in districts and states that voted largely for him in 2020 will not easily change their minds. The cognitive dissonance required to shift from believing Trump’s alleged conspiracy to accepting the reality of what occurred is simply too formidable. In addition, few of their sources of news -- Fox News, rightwing radio, and rightwing social media -- have questioned the Big Lie.

Because these districts or states lean Republican, these Big Lie candidates are likely to win the offices they are seeking, notwithstanding. In an open primary in a safely Republican Georgia district, for example, all nine candidates questioned the 2020 result. Of the two candidates who advanced to June’s runoff, lawyer Jake Evans touted his past efforts to “overturn” elections, while physician Rich McCormick emphasized that he refused to concede in a 2018 race. Many of these Republican Big Lie candidates will hold positions with the power to interfere in the outcomes of future contests -- to block the certification of election results, to change the rules around the awarding of their states’ electoral votes or to acquiesce to litigation attempting to set aside the popular vote.

The third reason the hearings aren’t affecting the Republican Party is that the GOP’s biggest backers -- such as billionaire Peter Thiel, who has donated tens of millions of dollars to the campaigns of Big Lie candidates J.D. Vance and Blake Masters -- show no signs of reducing their backing in light of the committee’s findings.

It’s shameful enough that Republican lawmakers and candidates have embraced the Big Lie for the utterly cynical purpose of gaining or remaining in power. For the GOP’s billionaire funders to embrace it as well, presumably for no purpose other than to destabilize American democracy, can only be described as traitorous.

In his closing statement before the January 6 committee, former U.S. appellate court judge J. Michael Luttig -- one of the most conservative judges in the federal system, whom George W. Bush passed over for the Supreme Court because Bush thought him too conservative -- called Trump and his allies and supporters “a clear and present danger to American Democracy.” This was not only due to what happened on January 6, said the Judge, but because they still “pledge that in the presidential election of 2024 if the former president or his anointed successor as the Republican Party presidential candidate were to lose that election that they would attempt to overturn that 2024 election in the same way that they attempted to overturn the 2020 election.”

By not divesting itself of the Big Lie and not embracing the truth of what the January 6 committee is revealing, the Republican Party is losing its last shred of moral authority to function as one of America’s two governing parties.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: clintonista; dasfourthreich; dwarftossing; hartfordcourant; hoorschargehalfprice; lyinglittleleftypunk; lyinglittlepunk; reich; robertbreich; robertreich; sawedoffrunt; shrimponthebarbie; thediminutiveone; thief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Signalman

Sniffer is a failure.


41 posted on 06/21/2022 11:44:15 AM PDT by depressed in 06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Sit down, Robbie! Oh wait, are you already sitting down?


42 posted on 06/21/2022 11:44:21 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Robert B. “Third” Reich


43 posted on 06/21/2022 11:44:41 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (No food in the stores; fuel prices too high? Thank a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
No, that was actor Michael Dunn - who was a guest villain on The Wild, Wild West back in the 1960's.
44 posted on 06/21/2022 11:44:55 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Continued coup? Biden is President. Trump is not. What the heck is this guy talking about?


45 posted on 06/21/2022 11:46:59 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

As Rush would say.. Robert B. Riccccccccccccccccccchhhhhhhhhuh.


46 posted on 06/21/2022 11:47:09 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“...demolished the myths of voter fraud...”

And just how did they do that, by talking to people who never bothered to examine the evidence of fraud.

“The Big Lie” is what Reich and his crowd have been pushing all along. For almost 5 years they pushed the “Russia Collusion” Big Lie, then it was the Ukraine Big Lie, then it was the Russian Bounty on US Troops Big Lie, then the Trump called WW1 casualties Suckers Big Lie. Now it has been the Insurrection Big Lie for the last 18 months.

Robert Reich is a malignant dwarf who said that he didn’t want any of the stimulus money (0bama era) going to white men.


47 posted on 06/21/2022 11:48:53 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
I think his analysis comes up a little short!
48 posted on 06/21/2022 11:49:40 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Little man little brain .

Don’t believe anything you read in the left wing democrat media.

ANYTHING.


49 posted on 06/21/2022 11:50:56 AM PDT by Pearfect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
“We fool ourselves if we believe that the televised hearings of the January 6 committee are changing the direction of the Republican Party...”
Slack jawed, knuckle dragging never-Trump Republicans think it's about getting rid of Trump. Do that then get back to life as normal.

Reich just exposed the real goal. All Republicans (and Fox News) are the intended goal, but they're too blinded by hatred to know it.

It will be interesting to see the cold shoulder Liz and the rest of the neanderthals on that committee get when this is over.

50 posted on 06/21/2022 11:52:50 AM PDT by lewislynn (The Murdochs might be citizens but they aren't true blue Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

It doesn’t really matter what those “witnesses” thought, their testimony is all about their opinions. No facts, no evidence. So who cares what people think? Opinions differ, is that a crime? The ‘Rats would like to pretend so.


51 posted on 06/21/2022 11:54:52 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

projection


52 posted on 06/21/2022 11:57:30 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

“There can be no co-existences with such people.”

You will never know how much I agree with that statement.


53 posted on 06/21/2022 11:57:48 AM PDT by Tupelo (Don't underestimate The Republican Party's ability to f*ck things up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Since there has been NO evidence allowed to be presented about the ACTUAL election theft in 6 states in which each election counting STOPPED at nearly the same time in the early AM- and Trump presented this summary from the NEW YORK TIMES showing the impossible jumps in numbers in these states....

None of this was presented or even sought by the January 6th illegitimate committee, and so this idiot can safely say, relative to the committee that “no evidence’ existed. For the same reason as the Giuliani presented Court challenges in these states were not heard. However the facts are recorded, and in fact the digital vote was traced-.

So this white washed bunch of crap from witnesses who bring no other evidence than what they want— gives them a Kangaroo “COURT” which is not even legal to make a “referral “ based on any factual information. They know it is Bs.

And Schiff is composing the narrative— making it up.
Stalinist show trial. And now this midget stature and mind idiot runs his yap.


54 posted on 06/21/2022 11:58:48 AM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

lol very funny!


55 posted on 06/21/2022 11:59:02 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Reichhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


56 posted on 06/21/2022 12:00:00 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hyman Roth

Can hear him say it now.

We sure could use him at this point.

Gonna have to make do.


57 posted on 06/21/2022 12:02:47 PM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pearfect

Who knew that Jews had leprechauns?


58 posted on 06/21/2022 12:02:55 PM PDT by Vehmgericht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

yeah- he has to project-— or most would look right over the top of him, small man and very small vicious mind the Labor LEFT midget of the Clinton admin. Rush’s pronunciation of his name ends..... Reichhhhhhhhhhh—EHH! Economics instructor who elevated his status to a full professor somewhere. All bull..


59 posted on 06/21/2022 12:03:04 PM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"It doesn’t really matter what those “witnesses” thought, their testimony is all about their opinions. No facts, no evidence. So who cares what people think? Opinions differ, is that a crime? The ‘Rats would like to pretend so."

Yeah, that was my point. They are acting like unsupported opinions are equivalent to proof that the claims of election irregularities have been debunked. It's like: Witness: "I don't think there was election fraud." Committee: "Ok, case closed."
60 posted on 06/21/2022 12:06:05 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson