Bill Barr treasonous swamp rat

6/12/2022 | dmeara

[jacknhoo]

Good synopsis.

[unread]

Bill “no evidence” Barr... People just aren’t as brave or as moral as they use to be...

[Brian Griffin]

Election theft was almost certainly not of sufficient scale to have swung five states.

I suspect only three states’ [Georgia’s almost certainly and quite possibly Wisconsin’s and Arizona’s] electoral votes were stolen from Trump.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Both parties wanted Trump out so they could get their 30 year plan to turn the USA into North Mexico back on track in order to get a new electorate that would vote to give up our sovereignty and subsume the USA to the UN in a New World Order.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The stole WI, AZ, GA, PA, MI and probably NV.

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

Seriously?

They shut down vote counting at midnight, tossed all the poll watchers out of the counting areas, and then brought back only democrats.

Trump was leading by hundreds of thousands of votes in Pennsylvania at midnight, and then, by “magic,” printed “ballots” were found, enough to give Biden the state in the wee morning hours of Wednesday, November 4th.

Stolen.

[Observator]

Minor point, but Barr was considered a saint after the Mueller Report was released.

As Mo Brooks found out, bona fides only go so far. Or actually, they don't go anywhere at all.

[Tunehead54]

Look for Detroit counting center with numerous people dragging in coolers, trash bags, back packs etc. just walking into the counting center past security without stopping and vans arriving late downstairs. I’ll stick with my lying eyes and add Illinois to your stupid list - win-lose in 8 swing states maxxed at 60,000 votes? Chicken feed.

[FreeReign]

Minor point, but Barr was considered a saint after the Mueller Report was released. As Mo Brooks found out, bona fides only go so far. Or actually, they don't go anywhere at all.

You mean people support Barr and Brooks when they do something right and they don't support those people when they do something wrong.

Imagine that. Liking somebody based on their actions and not falling for a cult of personality.

[Observator]

Trump was leading by hundreds of thousands of votes in Pennsylvania at midnight, and then, by “magic,” printed “ballots” were found, enough to give Biden the state in the wee morning hours of Wednesday, November 4th.

In order to believe this, you need to believe the following things:

• Almost every Republican lawmaker in PA is either stupid or corrupt.
• Almost every judge in PA is stupid or corrupt.
• Almost every Republican in the US House and Senate is either stupid or corrupt.
• The entirety of conservate media was incapable of capturing this information in format that could convince decision makers living outside social media bubbles.

Reminds me of the quote it's too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy cutting hair.

The other option (Occam's) is that voters in a purple state elected Biden amidst a pandemic and lackluster campaign that didn't bother even adopting a platform.

[Observator]

More like not calling a fellow traveler a traitor because of one issue in which you disagree.

[wac3rd]

Nail, meet hammer

[FreeReign]

More like not calling a fellow traveler a traitor because of one issue in which you disagree.

The "just" one issue is ignoring overwhelming evidence of a presidential election steal.

Seems pretty important. I wouldn't describe it as "just" one issue. But you would.

[Observator]

Sorry, I can't get on a bandwagon going to the North Pole where the driver smokes crack and has no GPS.

Different story if the "overwhelming proof" convinces someone, *anyone*, in a position of authority. Where the stakes of a decision are greater than pushing "send" in a browser.

[FreeReign]

Sorry, I can't get on a bandwagon going to the North Pole where the driver smokes crack and has no GPS.

Sorry, that's an empty response.

Different story if the "overwhelming proof" convinces someone, *anyone*, in a position of authority. Where the stakes of a decision are greater than pushing "send" in a browser.

Instead of relying on "a person in authority" to be convinced, it's better for one to examine the facts themselves, apply some critical thought and come to their own conclusion.

[gibsonguy]

You are wrong or lying. Pennsylvania and Michigan were both stolen. Pa was just brazen. In Michigan there are sworn affidavits are trucks unloading boxes of ballots at 2:00 am in Detroit. Plus accounts of Dominion machines giving rigged results. Barr made sure he stayed on until the last day so Trump could not put someone in who would actually look into the cheating. Barr is a devious rat traitor.

[marktwain]

Barr is either a cunning, conniving liar, or a fool.

My money is on cunning, conniving liar.

[Observator]

Instead of relying on "a person in authority" to be convinced, it's better for one to examine the facts themselves, apply some critical thought and come to their own conclusion.

I agree with you, but within some practical bounds.

I'm not an engineer. When I'm driving across a bridge, I have faith that the right people have designed and inspected the bridge. The alternative is a crippling paranoia that goes nowhere and can't be dispelled by any reasonable argument.

I'm all for individualism but at some point the common reality needs to be integrated. Otherwise, why not be a Scientologist? At least then you get to hang with Tom Cruise.

[M_Continuum]

But critical thought amongst our ranks is almost nil. Doing ones own research is code for confirmation bias. True research, true critical thinking involves looking at all information, all, even that which you dislike. We lack this in spades.