Posted on 06/07/2022 9:11:17 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
Jesse Kelly spoke with Dr. Naomi Wolf on his show about the 55,000 documents that Pfizer dropped recently, and that were ignored by the media. Highly-credentialed experts volunteered to go through them and what they are finding is shocking and criminal.
Pfizer has experimented with the human race and there were deadly consequences. They knew of all the adverse effects.
They knew a month after the rollout that the vaccine had waning efficacy or vaccine failure. The public didn’t know until a year later. People got vaccinated or lost their jobs based on lies.
The public also wasn’t told that the nanoparticles and spike proteins don’t stay in the Deltoid. Pfizer knew it goes right into the bloodstream and enters adrenal glands, liver, lymph nodes, ovaries, and so on. Pfizer knew that.
The pharmaceutical giant also lost thousands of records of adverse events.
Pfizer knew four months after the vaccine rollout, there were 42,000 adverse events, and 1200 people who died. They also knew 4 people died the day of the vaccination…
(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...
Has she ever renounced her feminist screeds? No? Then has she really moved to the right, or has she become more and more attracted to conspiracy theories?
She thought the ISIS beheadings of British and Americans were faked. She claimed we sent our military to West Africa, not to help with Ebola pandemic, but to bring it back here, setting off a military takeover. Plenty more.
I’m a feminist.
6 boosters were pre-planned into the program.
Haven’t they released 5 already?
==
I didn’t trust the media/CDC/officials when this thing first broke and they had the scare stories of people falling dead in the streets, people getting contaminated just being within 10 feet of a carrier for 10 seconds, etc.
Then, they flip-flopped all over the place about the value of masks. And quarantines.
Then, when they did start the vaccinations, it was the same sort of propaganda. Get vaccinated and you won’t get COVID. Well, you won’t get it as severe. You will only catch COVID once. Well, maybe more.
If you are unvaxxed, you are a spreader, and an evil person, and you probably pull wings off flies.
The harder they push, the more I recoil. They are still running ads about how save the vaccine is.
CoupFlu has NEVER been about public health.
Yep. I had to scroll down a ways to find your gem. She’s basically a soul sister to “Doctor” You-know-who.
“Has she ever renounced her feminist screeds? No?”
Or “not yet”. Not everyone who moves away from the left instantly transforms into a conservative overnight. Yet many of them end up there eventually.
“Then has she really moved to the right, or has she become more and more attracted to conspiracy theories?”
Yes, she just released a piece today defending the conservative interpretation of the 2nd amendment, so she certainly has moved to the right.
So, what exactly are your medical and research credentials? Could you please point out specifically what is wrong with the data she's talking about? Much of it, we've known for some time now, as it has been coming out in dribs and drabs for months. Please enlighten us as to exactly why we should be trusting Pfizer's claims of safety. I'm sure we'd all be interested.
More garbage from the anti-vaxxer cult. This has been debunked numerous times because of it’s faulty logic and poor statistics:
https://fullfact.org/health/vaccination-miscarriage-CDC-study-inaccurate/
Kooky Third Wave feminist like Naomi?
Have you read her book Vagina: A New Biography?
“The book gets loopier as it goes on. We learn that women think and feel through their vagina, which can “grieve” and feel insulted, for example, by slang terms...”
How about her book Outrages: Sex, Censorship, and the Criminalization of Love (yes, by love she means homosexual acts).
What’s more, she’s become infamous as a sloppy researcher. She got the number of anorexic deaths and much else all wrong in her first book, The Beauty Myth. In Outrages, she got it all wrong, as she interpreted “death recorded” to mean “executed” when it in fact meant the opposite: the the convict was pardoned or sentence was commuted. One of her book was so full of errors the publisher had to pulp it.
She was all in on Occupy Wall street.
How about this one?
“Wolf has tweeted that she overheard an Apple employee (who had attended a “top secret demo”) describing vaccine technology that can enable time travel.”
Yep. Kook.
But if you want to believe every loon who comes along just because they spout what you like to hear, be my guest.
She was all Tea Party, then switched to Occupy Wall Street. Sounds like she jumps on whatever bandwagon is passing by. The next one she jumps on may or may not be conservative. She’s a flake.
So what exactly are your credentials?
You are attributing words to me I never wrote. I never said you should trust Pfizer.
What’s wrong with the data?
Of 35 pregnant women, 28 lost their babies
Wrong. Out of 270 (not 35) pregnant women, 28 lost their babies.
“23 reported an outcome of spontaneous abortion, 2 neonatal deaths, 2 spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death and 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death (28 total)”*
Why the error? You must remember this status report was a snapshot in time. There were only 35 known outcomes at the time of the report. The remaining pregnant women were still carrying their babies, hence no known outcome yet.
Between 10% and 20% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, according to the traditional estimates. However it may be even more:
As for her other claim about breastfeeding, she gives no sources or figures. She is infamous for sloppy research even when writing a book. See my #29 here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4069269/posts?page=29#29
Why should I believe everything she spouts?
I didn't bring it up, you did. feel free. we'll wait.
No, I did not bring up medical credentials other than to say her “Dr” title is for a PhD in English Lit, not medicine. I also demonstrated she is known for sloppy research in her published books on feminism.
You asked what was “wrong with the data”. I answered what was wrong. You come back with *my* credentials again.
The point is: Why should anyone automatically believe her assertions, given she has no medical credentials and is notorious for being a sloppy researcher? And she comes off as a bandwagon hopping kook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.