Posted on 05/11/2022 3:26:45 PM PDT by Nextrush
Kathy Barnette has just sent me her photos of her military records, both Army Reserve and National Guard...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Bttt
Hmmm.
If ever I run for office I will probably relate my time served as a lieutenant in the military.
Of course when it is found that I actually only served three years in JROTC in high school, then maybe, just maybe my credentials won’t be so important.
Here’s her campaign site bio. Yeah, probably not Ivy League schools, but she’s worked in the financial world, has her master’s, and has been an adjunct professor.
https://barnetteforsenate.com/bio/
FWIW, I don’t have MY DD-214. I’ve tried off and on for 10 years to get a copy. This time I’m re-submitting my request via my Senator’s office, so hopefully the bastards (who admit they have it on file) will get off their butts and send me a copy. 25 years in, retired.
But she’s a mother of two children, spent over a decade in the army and army reserves, ran for office previously, wrote and published a book, has been a bit of an activist, etc.
That’s plenty. .................... I was reading the comments on twitter. If you joined the Reserves or Guard after 73, weren’t in it to avoid the draft. Lets give her the credit, for her volunteered service. From what I can gather, she will be better than that bartender chick they put in Congress. There had to be a break in Service if she spent 10 yrs as an E4. Hmmmmmm? Busted? probably not, to be continued. ???
But she’s a mother of two children, spent over a decade in the army and army reserves, ran for office previously, wrote and published a book, has been a bit of an activist, etc. That’s plenty.
That may be “plenty” for her supporters, but it’s an awfully marginal resume for someone who is running for the U.S. Senate without ever having served in public office. How about a few years in the House — or even her local town council — for someone who is listed as a professional politician?
Went to the Wayback Machine http://web.archive.org/web/20220504032443/https://barnetteforsenate.com/bio/
This was May 4, 2022 - so not that long ago, but it is proof it was not edited today after the supposed “controversy” over her being in the reserves - that’s what it says.
Going back over a year on her website she claims she was in fact in the reserves. Parnell needs to get his facts straight - and so do you.
http://web.archive.org/web/20210410223437/https://barnetteforsenate.com/
From April 2021. All captures to the present day all say “Reserves”
FYI - update to my previous post - captures going back further on the main page also say “reserves” - http://web.archive.org/web/20210410223437/https://barnetteforsenate.com/
That is an April 2021 capture.
Kathy Barnette’s children have been to our Tea Party meetings many times. Kathy has spoken there so many times that I watched her kids grow up.
She’s running against the scum of Oz and McCormick and with all their money and Establishment behind them it is getting vicious now against Barnette. So far, as far as I can see, they haven’t made a dent.
They’re the ones with the privileged, Ivy backgrounds and she ran circles around them in their debate.
How many times did Oz show up?
“How many times did Oz show up?”
*
*
Never. Our Tea Party is conservative.
Barnette Rocks, send her to debate Chucky and Ma Squaw.
“25 years in, retired.”
You were in the military for 25 years, retired, and you don’t have a DD 214? Seriously? WTF?
OK, it looks legit from here. (Retired Army Officer)
Very common for soldiers choosing not to reenlist after 4 years.
The Army considers all three components, Active, NG and USAR to be part of the whole picture.
There are some on here that are turning into piranhas going after her...
It’s very strange - why the long knives all of a sudden for her?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.