Posted on 05/07/2022 6:56:29 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
I've been asking everyone: Show me the all-cause mortality data proving the vaccines are safe. I finally got some data. It's from the UK government and it's devastating. REALLY devastating.
New UK government data allows us to analyze the data in a way we couldn’t before. This new analysis shows clearly that the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save for all age groups. In other words, they shouldn’t be used by anyone. The younger you are, the less sense it makes.
Anyone can validate the data and methodology. The results make it clear that the COVID vaccines should be halted immediately.
Not a single public health authority in any country will have a conversation with us on the record to justify their vaccine recommendations or explain how this analysis is wrong. I wonder why?
Here’s the result of the analysis.
What this means is that if you are 25 years old, the vaccine kills 15 people for every person it saves from dying from COVID. Below 80, the younger you are, the more nonsensical vaccination is. The cells with * means that the vaccine actually caused more COVID cases to happen than the unvaccinated.
Above 80, the UK data was too confounded to be useful. Until we have that data, it’s irresponsible to make a recommendation.
I describe below how you can compute this yourself from the UK data.
Please share this result on all your social media platforms.
One of my friends recently sent me a link to the mortality data from the UK government Office of National Statistics from January 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. I had not seen this data before so I analyzed it.
What I found was absolutely stunning because it was consistent with the VAERS risk-benefit analysis by age that I had done....
(Excerpt) Read more at stevekirsch.substack.com ...
mewzilla wrote: “But if vaxxed mothers are harming their babies by breastfeeding them, God help Deep States.”
Relax, these claims that vaccinated mothers are harming their babies by breastfeeding is nothing but more fear-mongering by the anti-vaxxers.
Y or N: Has the CDC issued any statement officially denying vaccine involvement.
More hyperbolic fear-mongering from Steve Kirsch.
or this:
So Left-wing sites have the truth.
Check.
I am encouraging all lefties in america to be vaxxed.
E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “So Left-wing sites have the truth.
Check.”
So, a fact check must adhere to the anti-vaxxer narrative to be considered credible? Really? Anyone who considers Malone, Mercola, Kirsch as credible has no room to criticize.
Decent but not definitive ‘refutations’ of previous data not referenced in this posting.
Please present to the class the refutation of the UK data.
Bump for the Canary in the Coal Mine: Big Steve!
Are you properly jabbed and boosted?
Go_Raiders wrote: “Decent but not definitive ‘refutations’ of previous data not referenced in this posting. Please present to the class the refutation of the UK data.”
Read the links.
nosf40 wrote: “Are you properly jabbed and boosted?”
Why is that relevant?
A site that calls itself a “fact check” is nothing more than an opinion site that calls itself a “fact check” but you are too dumb to know that?
There’s alway one in the crowd.
I know, right? The good news is I think they have burnt the conditioning. People aren’t afraid to be accused of that so much anymore, or at least it seems like it to me.
When you think about it, conspiracy is extremely common. It is two or more people working together illegally against others. This is a routine and common occurrence and has happened and been uncovered throughout human history. It is irrational to believe people are NOT conspiring against others for a benefit.
Yet they had everyone turned around on that. Unbelievable.
Your links are related to a previous assertion, which was based on the unrelated U.S. VAERS dataset that has huge uncertainties.
From Link 1 - “Their case is built primarily on a VAERs analysis, and one whose results are driven by assumptions of an artificially low background death rate and high underreporting rate with questionable justification.”
No reference to UK data, sport.
From Link 2 - “The analysis relies heavily on data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which documents suspected reactions to COVID-19 shots to detect possible safety issues.”
No reference to the UK data here either, champ.
Perhaps it is you who needs to do some reading, namely the Substack post where he describes how he used the U.K. source data to arrive at his current analysis.
I guess your logical circuits are fried. COVID infection is 99.8% survivable. So if the jabs save a small number of the millions injected from death, and the data does not support that the jab saves even a small %, even 1000% more deaths is a very small #. Example it would be on the order of 1600 people died from the jab for example to save 10 people.
You claim: “Anyone who considers Malone, Mercola, Kirsch as credible has no room to criticize.”
Your cavalier dismissal of Malone and Mercola tell me all I need to know about your analytical abilities. Thanks for the reveal.
Montana_Sam wrote: “Your cavalier dismissal of Malone and Mercola tell me all I need to know about your analytical abilities. Thanks for the reveal.”
Your cavalier acceptance of Malone and Mercola tell me all I need to know about your analytical abilities. Thanks for the reveal.
Do you realize that Malone is making millions off of his scare-mongering?
Do you realize that Mercola is one of the biggest purveyors of quack alternative medicine products?
It is in neither of their best interests to be truthful in their pronouncements.
Our pal Duke is a “reasoned” superior human. Anything that gives signals that the vax is doing damage and nor delivering as promised is dismissed as irrelevant. It is amazing to be so intellectually superior as to dismiss anything not meeting your beliefs. A true skeptic, the right position of a scientist, is to look at all sides and not be dismissive of what you don’t like. Let him wallow in his “superiority”, however deluded he is. He believes people that lie, peddle lies and gaslight lies. He has taken sides, and he has taken the side of the liars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.