E. Pluribus Unum wrote: “So Left-wing sites have the truth.
Check.”
So, a fact check must adhere to the anti-vaxxer narrative to be considered credible? Really? Anyone who considers Malone, Mercola, Kirsch as credible has no room to criticize.
Are you properly jabbed and boosted?
A site that calls itself a “fact check” is nothing more than an opinion site that calls itself a “fact check” but you are too dumb to know that?
You claim: “Anyone who considers Malone, Mercola, Kirsch as credible has no room to criticize.”
Your cavalier dismissal of Malone and Mercola tell me all I need to know about your analytical abilities. Thanks for the reveal.