Your links are related to a previous assertion, which was based on the unrelated U.S. VAERS dataset that has huge uncertainties.
From Link 1 - “Their case is built primarily on a VAERs analysis, and one whose results are driven by assumptions of an artificially low background death rate and high underreporting rate with questionable justification.”
No reference to UK data, sport.
From Link 2 - “The analysis relies heavily on data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which documents suspected reactions to COVID-19 shots to detect possible safety issues.”
No reference to the UK data here either, champ.
Perhaps it is you who needs to do some reading, namely the Substack post where he describes how he used the U.K. source data to arrive at his current analysis.