Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Owner of Jeep who took his car to dealership for oil change is sued for $15M by family of mechanic, 42, who died after teenager worker who couldn't drive a shift stick crashed into him
Daily Mail UK ^ | May 5, 2022 | Andrea Blanco

Posted on 05/05/2022 3:55:44 PM PDT by Morgana

The owner of a Jeep became embroiled in a legal nightmare after he handed the keys of his vehicle to a Michigan dealership where a mechanic died while working on his car.

The family of Jeffrey Hawkins, 42, is suing the Jeep owner, who has not been named, for $15million over the death of the veteran mechanic.

Hawkins, a married father-of-four, was killed on March 13, 2020, while changing the Jeep's oil at Rochester Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge dealership in Michigan.

A 19-year-old fellow mechanic, who didn't know how to drive a shift stick and did not have a driver's license, had started the car and removed his feet from the clutch causing the Jeep to jump forward.

Hawkins, who was performing an oil change at the time, was ran over and died instantly.

It is unclear why the 19-year-old mechanic was hired despite his lack of qualifications. A lawyer for the dealership declined to comment.

Under Michigan law, employees cannot sue their employers or fellow staff members for accidents that happen in the workplace.

David Femminineo, an attorney representing Hawkins' family admitted that the lawsuit 'seems unfair' but argued that the man who had taken his Jeep to the dealership is still legally liable for the tragedy.

'If you go to lunch and give your car to someone and an accident happens, you'd be liable for that. Same thing happens here,' Femminineo told DailyMail.com Thursday.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Travel
KEYWORDS: automotive; bidenvoters; jeep; scrolldown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Morgana
I read the article twice (my bad) and still can't figure out the plaintiff and defendant.

5.56mm

21 posted on 05/05/2022 4:17:51 PM PDT by M Kehoe (Quid Pro Joe and the Ho need to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Seems an absurd case to me. Sorry the guy died, but can not see how the jeep owner is at fault.


22 posted on 05/05/2022 4:18:55 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Just reapo d to all interrogatories in cursive writing. That should stall them for several years.


23 posted on 05/05/2022 4:19:28 PM PDT by txeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Sue everyone.


24 posted on 05/05/2022 4:20:55 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( I make airplanes fly, what's your super power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I suspect the claimant is suing the car owner because the family knows the owner can’t afford a long civil case whereas the dealer has more resources (insurance) for acts caused by idiot employees. In other words - suing the car owner will be easy money.


25 posted on 05/05/2022 4:23:34 PM PDT by llevrok (Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Yeah, but it is not the employee that would be suing the dealership, it is his family. So that MI rule should be bypassed. Or is the Jeep owner richer than the dealership?


26 posted on 05/05/2022 4:24:34 PM PDT by gnickgnack2 ( Another bad day for Trump, he only got seven major things accomplished .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Saul Goodman syndrome?


27 posted on 05/05/2022 4:29:41 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

WTF? This case should never see the inside of a courtroom. What a disgrace.


28 posted on 05/05/2022 4:31:04 PM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Looks more like an OSHA lock out-tag out failure.

Point the family to the Fed Gooberment and let them sue the pants off the dealership.


29 posted on 05/05/2022 4:35:49 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

‘If you go to lunch and give your car to someone and an accident happens, you’d be liable for that. Same thing happens here,’

Of course not. Absurd. This lawyer has gotten the idea that since so much stupidity is succeeding, he would try his own brand.

This suit won’t last five minutes in court, if it ever gets there. And the lawyer might be disbarred.


30 posted on 05/05/2022 4:37:44 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The car dealership employees a 19 year old kid who can't drive, does not have a driver's license and has him driving cars into the bay for an oil change yet this is somehow the car owner's fault?

Democrats would support blaming the owner if he's rich - say makes $50,000/year.

31 posted on 05/05/2022 4:37:55 PM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is an illustration of how stupid Michigan legislators are.

Stop thinking the law is about justice. It is not.


32 posted on 05/05/2022 4:41:16 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
David Femminineo, an attorney representing Hawkins' family admitted that the lawsuit 'seems unfair' but argued that the man who had taken his Jeep to the dealership is still legally liable for the tragedy.

Apparently Femminineo is just another sleeze bag lawyer who just happens to run constant adds on the local channels here In Michigan.....

33 posted on 05/05/2022 4:43:32 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm Jimmy Crack Corn and I don't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gnickgnack2
From the text: The dealership's insurance will be defending the owner and paying for any judgement and legal fees.

From the pictures it looks like the mechanic had lowered the car down on a lift, and was putting oil back in with the hood open, and the Jeep was started and driven forward smashing the guy into a tool cart up against the wall.

34 posted on 05/05/2022 4:43:41 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; All

More info. from a USA source (Jeep owner is off the hook):

“As Femminineo explained to Jalopnik, the Hawkins family can’t directly sue the dealership or its management. Michigan workers’ compensation law says you cannot sue a fellow employee for negligence while on the job. So the Hawkins family’s only option was to sue the Jeep owner. But that doesn’t mean the Jeep owner will be held responsible for the accidental death.

According to Femminineo, when the Hawkins family filed suit against the Jeep owner, that person immediately sued the dealership for indemnification, and won. With that victory in place, whatever results from the Hawkins family’s suit against the Jeep owner will be the legal responsibility of Rochester Hills Chrysler Jeep Dodge (and their insurance company). Basically, while the owner of the Jeep is named in the suit, that person won’t face any repercussions from the trial or judgment.”

https://jalopnik.com/why-a-jeep-owner-is-being-sued-for-a-mechanics-death-du-1848884952

and

https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/why-a-jeep-owner-is-sued-after-dealership-employee-was-killed-during-oil-change


35 posted on 05/05/2022 4:44:20 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I could imagine this happening at LubePros (they left the oil cap off once, and would not accept responsibility) and Jiffy Lube (their kid condescendingly told me my car needed “European oil”. He was confused a bit by the Mercedes-Benz hood ornament installed by a previous owner, but the car was a Buick Roadmaster station wagon. I went to a different oil change place.)

Car dealerships charge a premium and are presumed to be familiar with their own cars. Standard transmissions in Jeeps are not rare.

It sounds like the dealership’s insurance will pay the bills, otherwise the car’s owner would have to sue the dealership, and that costs more for everyone.


36 posted on 05/05/2022 4:44:54 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (“...we would live very well without Facebook."-B.LeMaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Cars are a lot safer these days AND there are more lawyers.
So competition in ambulance chasing is intense.


37 posted on 05/05/2022 4:44:58 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
The Rochester Hills Jeep dealership cannot be sued due to a legal standard in Michigan that protects employers from liability in workplace accidents.

so it's a workers comp issue ?

"the Jeep owner will be defended and indemnified by the Rochester Hills dealership's insurance,"...

I'm guessing the settlement will be less than 15mil
38 posted on 05/05/2022 4:45:44 PM PDT by stylin19a (My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance. We'll just see about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Part of this problem is a shortage of trained techs.
All the dealers around my area are scrambling for useful help.
One of the Nascar cars sponsored by a dealer group has “hiring technicians” as part of the advertising on the car.
My guess is somebody decided to hire a “body”


39 posted on 05/05/2022 4:47:20 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's Go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: odawg

What law school did that lawyer attend, and how did he ever graduate? First, the dealership is an independent contractor, so there’s no agency theory involved, and, next, unless the owner could reasonably foresee that the dealership employed dangerous mechanics, there is no proximate cause under negligence.


40 posted on 05/05/2022 4:49:24 PM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson