To: Red Badger
Whoop-dee-do! Katy bar the door!
*yawn*
2 posted on
04/25/2022 10:05:58 AM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: Red Badger
3 posted on
04/25/2022 10:10:30 AM PDT by
sauropod
("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
To: Red Badger
how do you keep it from rusting?
To: Red Badger
Someday, we shall have better “green” energy technologies—when we really need them!
There’s really no need to rush, unless you’re a tyrant trying to crush humanity!! Modern civilization cannot be run on solar, wind, and batteries!!!!
5 posted on
04/25/2022 10:13:15 AM PDT by
Honorary Serb
(Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
To: Red Badger
"Hydrogen fuel cells convert hydrogen to electricity..."
And then converts to fire.

6 posted on
04/25/2022 10:13:32 AM PDT by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Red Badger
Now crooks won’t try to steal your fuel cell just to get the platinum.
7 posted on
04/25/2022 10:13:36 AM PDT by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: Red Badger
Hydrogen still needs to be generated from another energy source. It can be separated from natural gas or by electrolysis of water. Either way, it's just a store of transformed energy into a difficult to store form. The clean "burn" of hydrogen is desirable in the isolation of a space vehicle. Solar cells make sense in the same context. The extra expense can be justified in that special use case. It doesn't make a lick of sense for the terrestrial commuter. Diesel/gasoline/liquid propane make the best fuels for vehicles. Great energy density that is rapidly replenished in the process of traveling.
10 posted on
04/25/2022 10:28:26 AM PDT by
Myrddin
To: Red Badger
14 posted on
04/25/2022 10:46:56 AM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
To: Red Badger
Since catalytic converters also use platinum and since they won’t be necessary with a hydrogen fuel cell, then I would think that there would be a cost offset.
Am I missing something here?
16 posted on
04/25/2022 11:08:55 AM PDT by
shotgun
To: Red Badger
Sounds promising and fantastic. Let entrepreneurial and technical research lead the way and not government edicts nor regulations. Develop away but leftards need to stop vilifying fossil fuels which are very necessary for current production of systems that fuel the economy. Dont destroy what currently is working in the name of ‘progress’.
20 posted on
04/25/2022 11:29:01 AM PDT by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny )
To: Red Badger
I used to work with some Real Smart People who were members of the Chicago Catalysis Club. It sounds funny til you understand how important catalysts are to just about everything. Don’t like being told to buy an EV? Better love your catalysts then, cuz those big honkin things you see driving past a refinery aren’t called “cat crackers” because they meow.
22 posted on
04/25/2022 11:32:32 AM PDT by
bigbob
To: Red Badger
Interesting. But the drawback to “green hydrogen” is that it is too costly and too hard to manage. Never be scalable for any intended use, other than niches.
To: Red Badger
Hydrogen fuel cells convert hydrogen to electricity with just water vapor as a byproduct, making them an appealing green alternative for portable power, particularly for vehicles. Water vapor is by far the biggest 'greenhouse' gas in our atmosphere.
27 posted on
04/25/2022 2:20:34 PM PDT by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson