Posted on 04/24/2022 1:51:59 PM PDT by Phoenix8
ElChapoCorp.Org actually pays $275.40 a head, but they
treat the kiddies really bad so I don’t deal with them.
I’m kind and gentle that way, a humanitarian.
>> Ain’t drownin’, Just wavin’...
lol
Certainly not when there is a dem president in the WH who could exercise the power of a pardon.
Add to the equation that while he seems to be slow-walking, it would appear a 5 year statute of limitations is moving right along. Arguably Durham would have to drop it all within the first year of the next R president, unless he finds a basis for extending the 5 year term.
At the moment he has campaign officials and other assorted operatives but not many big names.
Imagine the importance to many that it was Biden who won the election.
I still say no one of significance is going to jail.
Statute of limitations tick tock tick tock.
“Fitzmas” could come any day?
Have to agree, we know that the order came from Hillary and that Obama was involved, but so were the FBI and CIA.
There is just no way this goes further than some low level people.
Facing that, it is a wonder Durham got an indictments at all. Glad Merrick didn’t end up on the Supreme Court but now we know why Obama wanted to put him there.
Love how the demonikraps are claiming attorney-client privilege here .... but when they were convinced that attorney “Dead-End Cohen” had the goods on Trump that would end his presidency, they and their judge sang a different tune. All that happened was Cohen found out that (1) he is a criminal (2) no one trusts him and (3) he has no friends in either party. IOW - a pitiful loser who thought he could save himself by selling out on the truth.
Dude ya’ll get more creepy by the day with your pedo obsession.
“Cooper and Jeffress also have close ties to the Democratic Party”
That’s the money line, right there.
Neither one of these judges should be involved in this.
Correction: I didn’t mean Jeffries was a judge, I was referring to the actual judges.
Brandon can legally shut Durham’s probe down at any point and if it looks too close for the comfort of his politburo men they will probably do that, especially if his poll numbers stay low so that it can’t hurt politically. I kind of hope he does and drives his quinnipiac down into the twenties so that when the mid terms all turn up roses for the Leftocrats the whole population will know that the fix was very much in.
>>I’m not giving up hope. I want revenge for what the Democrats have done to this country.<<
I’m with you. I want to see the people who developed the lies, perpetuated them, conspired to cover up, Tech execs that banned free speech all prosecuted.
.
Clinesmith - no jail, no fine (he requested no fine, and got it)
And the DC Judge called him a good man at the (non) sentencing.
He can practice Law, you’re correct.
And Durham is pursuing the same single count charge with Sussman.
He’s trying to rewrite history to cover for the FBi and DoJ
Relax...nothing serious is going to come of it. Even if it did, Garland would quash it.
Agree my experience is when the government goes to trial on themselves the verdict is not guilty.
(i once had a Suzuki sidekick totaled in a national park concrete busy parking lot. A dead pine tree which was looming over the lot fell and crushed my car, it clearly should have been cut down before. I had to sue the park manager (who was a good guy but it was the only way) and the government got me a “representative” who was a government lawyer and their own lawyer. They went before a federal judge and presented the case. They then found themselves not guilty. Which was amazing as I told them: #1 it was a low value used car 2# I would settle for the cost of my deductible and insurance increase. All in all I thought I was being quite modest in my demands. They basically said you get nothing…GOOD DAY). True story….)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.