Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Evidence and commentary that the US has a pair of thirteenth amendments, an earlier one that prohibited titles of nobility (like attorney's 'ESQ') that was scrubbed to make way for the one we have now that eliminated slavery.
1 posted on 04/18/2022 4:53:40 PM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C210N

Just my $0.02, but a officers of the court, attorneys are part of the judicial branch and it’s a conflict of interest for them to serve as legislators. I think an attorney should have to resign from the bar and surrender any financial ties to any law practice before serving as a legislator.


2 posted on 04/18/2022 4:57:59 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Esquire in this country has nothing to do with the Crown...


3 posted on 04/18/2022 4:58:30 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

the courts, judges, and lawyers work against
the US Constitution for the Crown and its Bar.

they are all guilty of TREASON being beholding
to the Crown over their Oaths.


4 posted on 04/18/2022 5:00:53 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

“It should be noted that Lincoln was the first attorney POTUS”

I’m curious. Are you insane or just incredibly stupid and ignorant? Both?


5 posted on 04/18/2022 5:04:41 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

John Adams was the first lawyer to be President.


6 posted on 04/18/2022 5:04:55 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

From the little I read it is not clear that it was ratified by Virginia.

The posting has the smell of trying to bar Trump in 2024 because his hotel company had foreign government guests.

The text I read would have required the honor be of foreign government origin.


7 posted on 04/18/2022 5:07:24 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

https://freerepublic.com/tag/missingamendmenthoax/index


8 posted on 04/18/2022 5:08:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
...no logical errors have been made

And there is Dave's problem, right there.

9 posted on 04/18/2022 5:09:04 PM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

They’re OK because they use the yellow fringe on their flags...


12 posted on 04/18/2022 5:11:59 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Love's redeeming work is done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
It should be noted that Lincoln was the first attorney POTUS

Except for: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren, Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan

18 posted on 04/18/2022 5:41:41 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

I have read and posted about this before, There is NO REASON for this to be inoperative, THROW THEM OUT, it actually Removes Citizenship from Lawyers


19 posted on 04/18/2022 5:57:37 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
13th Amendment? The document says 13th article.
22 posted on 04/18/2022 6:19:38 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (A morning without coffee is like...just kidding. I have no idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
You've forgotten the "Corwin Amendment" which Lincoln supported and which was passed by both houses of congress and which was ratified by five Northern states.

It's still possible to ratify it because it does not have a sunset provision like later amendments did.

So we could theoretically get slavery back.

30 posted on 04/18/2022 8:59:08 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson