Posted on 04/10/2022 6:02:55 PM PDT by bitt
Pfizer hired 600 employees with a plan to hire a total of 1,800 employees when side effects from its COVID vaccine started showing up. The employees were hired to address the flood in adverse effects reporting.
Zerohedge shared a report Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times:
Pfizer hired 600 employees in the months after its COVID-19 vaccine was authorized in the United States due to the “large increase” of reports of side effects linked to the vaccine, according to a document prepared by the company.
Pfizer has “taken a multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports,” according to the document. “This includes significant technology enhancements, and process and workflow solutions, as well as increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
Given 100’s of millions of shots that number makes sense.
Can I give back the 2 jabs I got?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FOIA Request Unearths that Pfizer Planned to Hire 1,800 Employees to Deal with Reporting on Adverse Effects from COVID Vaccine, ifinnegan wrote: |
Given 100’s of millions of shots that number makes sense. |
Yup
Normalizing the abnormal is now what they do.
To wit- hey healthy young athletes are always dropping dead by the thousands each year.
Lemme guess:
All lawyers?
/s
“No, it doesn’t. That’s approximately 2 or 3 years worth of flu shots and yet the flu shots received a tiny fraction of the adverse events any of the Covid ‘vaccines’ received.”
Flu shots are decades old and approved.
The Pzifer vaccine was not approved, was being administered under Emergency Use Authorization.
Adverse events have to be monitored.
Vaccine administrations were all part of a clinical trial of an unapproved drug. In EUA (which is very rare) the data must be used in the approval process.
It’s a requirement of EUA use that adverse events must be monitored if the unapproved drug is used in emergency situation.
Not as rare as we have been told.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FOIA Request Unearths that Pfizer Planned to Hire 1,800 Employees to Deal with Reporting on Adverse Effects from COVID Vaccine, ifinnegan wrote: |
“No, it doesn’t. That’s approximately 2 or 3 years worth of flu shots and yet the flu shots received a tiny fraction of the adverse events any of the Covid ‘vaccines’ received.” Flu shots are decades old and approved. The Pzifer vaccine was not approved, was being administered under Emergency Use Authorization. Adverse events have to be monitored. Vaccine administrations were all part of a clinical trial of an unapproved drug. In EUA (which is very rare) the data must be used in the approval process. It’s a requirement of EUA use that adverse events must be monitored if the unapproved drug is used in emergency situation. |
*
That's pathetic, even for you. VAERS is a safety signal intended to pull products from the market if there were an excess number of adverse events reports, particularly death. You act like Pfizer gets XXXX number of kills 'free' 'cause it's new. That's not how it works. WIsh you had even a vague understanding of the contorted content you spew.
Your response does not make sense.
Pzifer hires people to work on the drug development/approval process which includes clinical trial results.
VAERS is a US Government program to allow reporting of reactions to vaccines independently of the pharmaceutical company.
It’s difficult to understand what point you are trying to make.
With all the complaints about the numbers in VAERS there is little accurate information publicly available about adverse events.
Let me guess. 1800 cleaners, hit men, thugs and assorted influencers, propagandists and lobbyists.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FOIA Request Unearths that Pfizer Planned to Hire 1,800 Employees to Deal with Reporting on Adverse Effects from COVID Vaccine, ifinnegan wrote: |
Your response does not make sense. Pzifer hires people to work on the drug development/approval process which includes clinical trial results. VAERS is a US Government program to allow reporting of reactions to vaccines independently of the pharmaceutical company. It’s difficult to understand what point you are trying to make. |
*
Of course you are distorting the issue. The Pfizer hiring took place after the 'vaccine' was authorized, not as you say during drug development to handle clinical trial results. Pfizer saw an astounding number of adverse events and just hired more Pfizer staff to help handle the overflow and no effort to protect the public was made - just push the pedal to the medal and get those toxic 'shots in arms.'
"Pfizer hired 600 employees in the months after its COVID-19 vaccine was authorized in the United States due to the “large increase” of reports of side effects linked to the vaccine, according to a document prepared by the company."
Yours is better.
‘Bout right.
“The Pfizer hiring took place after the ‘vaccine’ was authorized, not as you say during drug development to handle clinical trial results”
That is drug development. Authorized is not approval and as I’ve told you the EUA administrations were part of a clinical trial. Everyone who got jabbed was taking part in a clinical trial because the drug was not approved, still being developed.
At least you’re comprehensible in what you’re trying to say but up knowledgeable about the industry.
What I heard a few weeks ago was that they were hired in early 2021 after they started receiving information about a large number of unexpected adverse affects from the shot. They already had staff to address the lower number they expected but had to add so many more because the situation was so bad. Yet, they kept pushing the shots.
But Joe Biden and FDA told the public last summer before the mandates that it had been fully approved. It was a lie as the vaccines being used were not and were still under EUA. Community (sp) was approved but not available for use.
Additionally, Pfizer had already had on staff their employees who work addressing adverse effects, and they were doing so. When the shots became widely available in late 2020 and early 2021, the adverse affects were much so numerous and more severe than expected that the regular staff couldn’t handle them so they 1000+ more.
Remember the Swine flu debacle of ‘76?
That vaxx got pulled after fewer than 3 dozen people died.
Looks like Pfizer knew that wasn’t going to happen, didn’t it.
I caught you defending Covid ‘vaccines’ with false and distorted data, and then you double down with double talk and excuses. The Covid ‘vaccines’ are bioweapons and are behaving as expected, therefore death and debility are off the charts and should have been stopped at around 50 death reports. But the Covid ‘vaccine’ manufactures continue to kill and lie. And you support their lies.
This post of yours tries to excuse Covid ‘vaccines’ from the normal processes of ‘vaccine’ safety and reporting - and I mean all of them. There’s no valid safety threshold for Covid ‘vaccines’. Mathematicians have verified that the CDC’s fake ‘safety threshold’ (point at which the Covid ‘vaccines must be withdrawn from market for safety issues) is impossible to cross, by design.
It’s long past the time people stopped making the false claims about Covid that you make, and the false claims about vaccine safety that you make. Yet here you are, wasting time with nonsense defenses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.