“No, it doesn’t. That’s approximately 2 or 3 years worth of flu shots and yet the flu shots received a tiny fraction of the adverse events any of the Covid ‘vaccines’ received.”
Flu shots are decades old and approved.
The Pzifer vaccine was not approved, was being administered under Emergency Use Authorization.
Adverse events have to be monitored.
Vaccine administrations were all part of a clinical trial of an unapproved drug. In EUA (which is very rare) the data must be used in the approval process.
It’s a requirement of EUA use that adverse events must be monitored if the unapproved drug is used in emergency situation.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled FOIA Request Unearths that Pfizer Planned to Hire 1,800 Employees to Deal with Reporting on Adverse Effects from COVID Vaccine, ifinnegan wrote: |
“No, it doesn’t. That’s approximately 2 or 3 years worth of flu shots and yet the flu shots received a tiny fraction of the adverse events any of the Covid ‘vaccines’ received.” Flu shots are decades old and approved. The Pzifer vaccine was not approved, was being administered under Emergency Use Authorization. Adverse events have to be monitored. Vaccine administrations were all part of a clinical trial of an unapproved drug. In EUA (which is very rare) the data must be used in the approval process. It’s a requirement of EUA use that adverse events must be monitored if the unapproved drug is used in emergency situation. |
*
That's pathetic, even for you. VAERS is a safety signal intended to pull products from the market if there were an excess number of adverse events reports, particularly death. You act like Pfizer gets XXXX number of kills 'free' 'cause it's new. That's not how it works. WIsh you had even a vague understanding of the contorted content you spew.
Paid shill for Pfizer?! What are going to say when it is proven that 1) Pfizer lied about their results and 2) Pfizer kept on pushing booster shots when they knew it wouldn’t protect you from COVID?!