Posted on 03/16/2022 9:43:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really "vaccines" in the medical and legal sense of the word, but rather "experimental gene therapies." If proven true, the significance and legal ramifications of this allegation are profound.
This article summarizes a presentation by Dr. David Martin, a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, a developer of linguistic genomics, and molecular biologist Dr. Judy Mikovits.
In the presentation, Dr. Martin states, "You cannot have a vaccine that doesn't claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission." He goes on to say, "By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather, they only classify their products as 'gene therapy.'"
Dr. Martin states the Moderna and Pfizer products "do not prevent you from getting the COVID-19 infection, nor do they prevent its spread. They are really experimental gene therapies — unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you're trying to prevent, the Moderna and Pfizer injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus."
If indeed Moderna and Pfizer corporations are misrepresenting their experimental gene therapies as bona fide vaccines, Dr. Martin states that "the legal ramifications of this deception are immense — from a legal view, both Moderna and Pfizer qualify as using illegal deceptive practices by making medical claims without clinic trial proof of immunity and transmission blocking. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S. Code, Section 41, outlaws such deceptive practices."
During the presentation, various entities and individuals were identified as supporters of the above alleged deception,
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
In reality whom does the impact the most?
Age
Male
Female
And How?
Hello…….
That’s not a new concept.
This article is dated as follows;
March 16, 2022
What if the COVID-19 vaccines are not really vaccines?
By Paul S. Gardiner
What claims do you have that it isn’t dated as published?
Two years too late.
The author of this is way behind the curve on this. We’ve known this for about a year now.
They’re 2 years late. The jabs never met the definition of a vaccine until it was changed.
The jabs never met the definition of a vaccine until it was changed.
***Tagline worthy. I’ll update the tagline page
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3992415/posts?q=1&;page=384#384
I’ve argued to not call them ‘vaccines’ for a while. It creates a distorted view of what people believe they are taking.
...back at the office a mask wearing lady was about to take off the mask but hesitated, asking me “are you FULLY vaccinated?”. First, it’s none of your business. Second, even if I was, it’s no reason for you to feel more comfortable and less scared of contracting COVID. She then mentions wearing it to ‘protect her family’.
If anything, I feel sorry for them. They’re pumped full of lies - and it still continues.
Like Chris Mathews swooning over Obama? Ewww!
Seriously though, I was getting Shingles shot at the VA (to help finish repairing my roof) and the tech asked if I wanted a COVID booster too. "No thanks; maybe when they come out with an actual vaccine."
Almost missed it when he turned around and said "You got that right."
My God, we were saying they’re NOT VACCINES 18 months ago!
Ha!
The blog article is based on the bitchute interview I posted and was done in january 2021.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.