Posted on 03/01/2022 2:31:08 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
New data published by the British government show that infections and deaths with the novel coronavirus among the fully COVID-jabbed – including those who have taken the booster shots – are on the rise while infections and deaths among the un-jabbed continue to decline.
The U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publishes a weekly “vaccine surveillance” report, the latest of which was made available on February 24, detailing the trends in performance of the currently available abortion-tainted COVID-19 shots against infection, hospitalization, and death with the virus.
According to the report, infections with COVID-19 are highest among the triple-jabbed between 18 and 80 years of age in the U.K. and at least three times greater than the unvaccinated in every age cohort except those under 18.
In the most egregious cases, those who have taken booster shots represent over 40 times the risk of infection with COVID than those who remain untouched by the inoculations in the same age range.
The overall case count in England between January 24 and February 20 for COVID-19 was recorded as 1,490,464, with the triple-jabbed making up just over 50 percent of those cases and the double- and single-jabbed representing a combined 22 percent. The total “vaccinated” population’s susceptibility to infection, then, stands at around 72 percent, while the un-jabbed account for just over 27 percent…
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
The data is so bad for the vax crowd (Pfizer, fda,cdc) that they are fighting FOIA court orders to keep it secret, and the cdc and Scotland ministry of health are withholding data from people- because it *might* lead to vax hesitancy.
That’s ridiculous.
Yup
all “vaccines” “work like this”
Possibly. On one hand, being vaccinated might give people a false sense of security. Therefore they might be more likely to take risks than un-vaccinated people who are possibly taking more precautions.
On the other hand, the people that remain un-vaccinated now are by and large the IDGAF crowd. Sure some didn't want an experimental vax, but many other just never saw a need for a vax against something they don't see as a significant risk. So they probably haven't really changed their behaviors throughout this goat roping. Meanwhile many of the vaccinated are the most fearful and jumped on it at the first opportunity. These fearful types are more likely to continue to take precautions.
So an argument could be made either way - that the vaxxed or un-vaxxed groups are taking more risks.
The comorbidity argument is a little less even. You would think those most at risk would've been taken out by covid already. In the harshest Darwin terms this is survival of the fittest, or the least un-fit. So there should be fewer people with these contributing conditions, making the vaccines' failures all the more baffling. We should've culled the weak from the herd already.
OTOH two years of lockdowns and closures has contributed to whole new groups with poor diet, poor exercise, lack of outdoor activities, increased alcohol use. So we may have inadvertently created additional at-risk people with obesity, heart disease, diabetes, etc. through our attempts to keep people safe.
In general though, by any objective measure the vaccines have been a failure. They don't prevent you from getting infected - no vaccine does, but they are supposed to tee up your immune system to immediately, effectively fight off the infection. With virtually every other vaccine you never know you might have been exposed to Measles, Mumps, Polio, etc. The covid vaccines apparently do not prevent people from becoming symptomatic or even seriously ill or passing away. The back peddling on the initial prevention claims is now that the vaccines reduce severity of illness, rates of hospitalizations, and rates of death. Some "vaccine" {snort} - it only means you're maybe less sick. Maybe. In my book that's a failure. Even the weasel word justifications of less severe symptoms, less hospitalizations and less risk of death are starting to crack and crumble under the weight of incoming data. If we cannot resume formerly normal, now considered "risky" behaviors under the protection of the vaccines, if we must continue all the other preventative measures - then what good are the vaccines? They were sold as our path back to normal. The vaccine program is a failure.
I live in a fairly isolated area. Wuhan Red Death didn't really hit until 2021. With those genes, and fewer comorbidities than any of them, I figure I'm bulletproof.
But of course they have 21 states that have vaccine passports. This is nothing but a kill off and power grab.
Nobody was making similar excuses for ppl dying because they didn’t get jabbed. It was cut and dried: “99% of ppl dying from Covid are unvaccinated.” Even though that statement was never borne out by proof — because it turns out hospitals weren’t differentiating between vaxxed and non vaxxed — that didn’t stop the media from running with it. Now that the evidence shows the vaccine wasn’t the panacea everyone believed it would be, the pro-vaxxers are hard at work with a variety of qualifying statements to explain its failure. Well, guess what? We’re not buying it!
You can still get the disease.
You can still infect others.
You can still get sick.
You can still go to the ICU.
You can still die.
Seemingly, the more "vaccine" doses you get, the more susceptible you are to the disease.
According to the manufacturer, efficacy falls greatly over time and new variants are unaffected by the "vaccine".
And, bonus, lots of side effects including death.
Death rates are up and lifespans are contracting, another bonus.
Sounds like a pretty good vaccine to me. Sign me up!
There was an outbreak at Windsor. Elizabeth was triple jabbed and was diagnosed positive 10 days ago. The family all paid a visit to Eugenie on Sunday who interestingly took herself, husband and babies elsewhere.
More misinformation. I notice the lifesite avoids comparing rates of infection per hundred thousand and instead only talks about total cases. More than 90% of UK is vaccinated. Why is there surprise that more infections are among those vaccinated.
“But of the people admitted to hospital between Sept. 13 and Oct. 10, the vast majority were unvaccinated. Hospitalization rates were more than twice as high in unvaccinated people across all age groups, compared to those who had received two doses of a vaccine.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/22/4-charts-show-how-covid-vaccines-are-working-in-the-uk-.html
comparisons per 100,000 are out there and are easy to find. 90% vaccinated, I seriously doubt that.
They are now.
"In January, compared to fully vaccinated persons in each group shown below, the monthly rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations were:
7X Higher in Unvaccinated Adults Ages 18 Years and Older"
But you do have that vaccine induced brain fog.
I’ve done everything I wanted to do, travelled, met with people, hugged friends new and old, and never altered my DNA to do it. So there.
The DATA says people who chose your path are worse off. The anecdotal stories go either way. My risk of undue jab effects is zero. Yours seems to be increasing each time you get jabbed. I win.
You still trust the CDC data, even after all this time? Bless your little heart. 🤣
OK. Who's data do you want to use?
Me as well. But I got pampered on 5 cruises while you were shopping groceries, cooking and cleaning. I like my option better. You are not allowed to board ships.
Vaccines do NOT build a virus proof cocoon around the body. Heck vaccines do not even build a virus filter in nose. If you are exposed to virus, you will get infected.
Function of virus begins after infection takes place.
Sorry chump, you lose again.
I’ve been boating more than you have, and I get to drive it while you’re their cash cow. I win again!!
Did you hear that at least one version of your poison alters your DNA? Moderna might own you now.
reespirit2012 wrote: “comparisons per 100,000 are out there and are easy to find. 90% vaccinated, I seriously doubt that.”
Since that data is so easily available, why did Life Site use the misleading data?
“Almost seven in 10 of those aged 12 or over in the UK have had a booster, while nine in 10 have had a single jab and more than eight in 10 have had a second dose.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.