Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Kyle Rittenhouse Announces Intention to Sue Leftwing Media Personalities and Outlets Who Repeatedly Lied About Him– Whoopi Goldberg, Cenk Uygur, and Others Make the List
Gateway Pundit ^ | 2/21/2022 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 02/22/2022 6:10:41 AM PST by Bon of Babble

On Monday Kyle Rittenhouse explained his new project and defamation lawsuits in the works against Whoopi Goldberg, Cenk Uygur, and other targets.

Kyle Rittenhouse hinted that he may take action against the many leftwing politicians and operatives who smeared him as a murderer. The list included Joe Biden who called him a white supremacist in a campaign ad.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; cankersore; cenkuygur; kylerittenhouse; lawsuits; media; rittenhouse; whoopi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Bon of Babble

Good. If I had money I would pay his attorney fees.


21 posted on 02/22/2022 7:06:50 AM PST by I want the USA back (Government is to be feared much more than the chicom virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

No.


22 posted on 02/22/2022 7:10:38 AM PST by americas.best.days... ( Donald John Trump has pulled the sword from the stone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
...already rejected Sarah Palin's claim...

Unlike Sarah Palin, Kyle Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure" as per the standard of the notorious New York Times vs. Sullivan ruling.

The Covington High School kids were able to successfully sue CNN and the Wash Compost for liable, based upon the "public figure" rule. Hopefully Kyle Rittenhouse can do the same with Whoopi Goldberg and Cenk Uygur.

23 posted on 02/22/2022 7:14:08 AM PST by LuxAerterna (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Those mentioned will settle....

We'll see. This isn't the Sandman case.

24 posted on 02/22/2022 7:23:06 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
I'm not sure announce the intention helps much.

Actually file the lawsuits and let the media report it.

If they don't THEN come on air and report it.

25 posted on 02/22/2022 7:23:11 AM PST by G Larry (Tolerance will rise until intelligent people are banned from thinking to avoid offending imbeciles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
If I had money I would pay his attorney fees.

Lawsuits like these are almost always taken on contingency so Rittenhouse doesn't have to put any money up.

26 posted on 02/22/2022 7:24:28 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Good luck with that. If he carefully picks his court, his case may make it to trial. Of course, if it looks like the jury may consider finding in his favir, then his judge may do like Palin’s judge did and announce that he is going to dismiss it while the jury is deliberating.


27 posted on 02/22/2022 7:26:43 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble; P-Marlowe

He won’t do as well as the kentucky kid did. That kid was exonerated simply by noticing that he was entirely passive throughout the event.

Rittenhouse did take actions that were open to interpretation. So, his detractors can always fall back on having the freedom to have personal opinions.


28 posted on 02/22/2022 7:30:26 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Good! Hope he gets tons of money from them.


29 posted on 02/22/2022 7:32:58 AM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. Never be a peaceful slave in a new socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

He should really be quiet and let his lawyers do the talking.


30 posted on 02/22/2022 7:33:01 AM PST by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuxAerterna

Several courts have held that you can become an “involuntary public figure” for purposes of Sullivan as the result of publicity, even though you did not want or invite the public attention.


31 posted on 02/22/2022 7:33:39 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LuxAerterna
Unlike Sarah Palin, Kyle Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure" as per the standard of the notorious New York Times vs. Sullivan ruling.

He's busy making himself a public figure

32 posted on 02/22/2022 7:37:10 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

This is the stupid thing about conservatives. They announce what they are going to do instead of just DOING it!

Michael Hastings comes to mind.


33 posted on 02/22/2022 7:47:03 AM PST by Chickensoup ( Leftists totalitarian fascists are eradicating conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Sandman could not be construed as a public figure for purposes of defamation. All he did was stand quietly in a public place, where he had every right to be, waiting for his school bus. He did not become a public figure just because the lamestream media decided to pile on and defame him.

Most courts will probably find that Rittenhouse was either a limited use or involuntary public figure, and therefore subject to the Sullivan actual malice standard. Any chance that he would be found not to be a public figure went away when he started giving interviews.


34 posted on 02/22/2022 7:49:13 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

If he starts selling stock, I want in.


35 posted on 02/22/2022 7:53:47 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ((Honk!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Good for him the best way to clean up the medias is take all their money.


36 posted on 02/22/2022 7:58:38 AM PST by Vaduz ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

Yes


37 posted on 02/22/2022 9:30:29 AM PST by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

He’d better hurry his ass up, before the great reset hits.


38 posted on 02/22/2022 10:28:20 AM PST by TheElectionWasStolen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Any chance that he would be found not to be a public figure went away when he started giving interviews.

Thanks for clearing this up. I'm no lawyer. I wasn't familiar with the background of legal rulings to determine who meets the "public figure" standard.

Still, I hope he can find a sympathetic judge or jurisdiction that will waive the actual malice standard. Sandman was able to get Kentucky jurisdiction for his case, even though the actual events occurred in Washington DC.

39 posted on 02/23/2022 4:41:55 AM PST by LuxAerterna (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LuxAerterna

Rittenhouse absolutely is a public figure.

Public figures also include individuals who have achieved pervasive fame or notoriety. A person can even become an “involuntary public figure” as the result of publicity, even though that person did not want or invite the public attention.

Read Gertz v. Welch, Time v. Hill and Dameron v. Washington Magazine.


40 posted on 02/23/2022 6:38:54 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson