Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starship's advanced design is said to have NASA officials "[bleep]ing the bed"
Interesting Engineering ^ | February 16, 2022 | Chris Young

Posted on 02/18/2022 8:45:00 AM PST by SunkenCiv

"It will obsolesce all existing launch systems".

Elon Musk recently provided the first big update on SpaceX's Mars-bound rocket, Starship, and its competitors are watching on with "a mix of awe and horror", according to a report from Politico.

At his latest Starship presentation, SpaceX CEO Musk highlighted the fact that Starship will be reusable over and over again at a fraction of the cost of previous rockets. It's a development that threatens to leave NASA and other competitors in its wake as it launches to the proverbial stratosphere...

While it has long been known that Starship would be reusable, the advanced capabilities reportedly have other space organizations, including NASA, worried that their own in-development rocket projects will be rendered obsolete...

Starship is designed to be the first reusable spacecraft that will be able to take crew and cargo to the Moon and Mars before returning to Earth. By contrast, NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) for its Artemis Moon landing missions has gone billions of dollars over original budget estimations and is years behind schedule. What's more, NASA estimates that an SLS mission will cost approximately $2 billion per launch, while Musk announced in his latest presentation that a Starship mission could cost a comparatively low $1 million.

(Excerpt) Read more at interestingengineering.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: elonmusk; moonlandingdeniers; nasa; spacex; starship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: Nifster

Soon........

https://apnews.com/article/spacex-space-exploration-science-technology-business-a2400baf736ea4f39f3c7c2832c712db


41 posted on 02/18/2022 9:26:00 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We’ll see


42 posted on 02/18/2022 9:26:45 AM PST by Nifster (I’m see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Elon Musk: Say what you want about him but I believe he is a true genius on a par with Edison.


43 posted on 02/18/2022 9:28:22 AM PST by antidemoncrat (somRead more at: https://economicti Astronomers see white dwarf 'switch on and off' for first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

If it’s a s good as they say it is, I would expect some sabotage from NASA.................

NASA Officials Reportedly Horrified That SpaceX’s Starship May Succeed:

https://futurism.com/nasa-horrified-spacex

FAA pushes back review of SpaceX’s Starship to March 28:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/technology/faa-pushes-back-review-of-spacexs-starship-to-march-28/ar-AATQUhu


44 posted on 02/18/2022 9:28:50 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Headline Of The Year!


45 posted on 02/18/2022 9:29:06 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Probably, but Joe Biden would do something to Elon so the Chinese could steal it


46 posted on 02/18/2022 9:29:54 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free, the USA will never have equal justice under the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat
Elon Musk: Say what you want about him but I believe he is a true genius on a par with Edison Nikola Tesla.
47 posted on 02/18/2022 9:32:43 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If NASA had took the SLS money and put it into their command module and lander and used the Falcon 9 they could have already been back to the moon. NASA is a government jobs program at this point. They are regulating and paper working themselves into oblivion.


48 posted on 02/18/2022 9:33:23 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Fake science, meet the elites' science, which the intel agencies have been keeping from WE THE PEOPLE as insider information more than a century. Only our identified, hence forward-forever-under-NDA, best and brightest have been corrupted to be allowed to work with such knowledge.


(above) NASA Spokesman Petit, explaining just how incompetent NASA has been. Most believed him without lifting an eyelid.

49 posted on 02/18/2022 9:34:36 AM PST by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

NASA has two types of projects:

* Ones to do science
* Ones to keep congress happy

A $20 billion project like SLS creates a lot of funds for Senators to send to their favorite contractors. The Senators are happy and they give NASA $700 million to do a mission to Pluto.


50 posted on 02/18/2022 9:36:04 AM PST by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sarge83

See post 6—if NASA can’t fix their space-suit problem “going back to the moon” is not going to happen.


51 posted on 02/18/2022 9:36:35 AM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That’s what my old boss used to call “no sense of urgency”.


52 posted on 02/18/2022 9:37:55 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Considering most of what those congressmen are giving those corporations, the Constitution gives them no power to actually... give...

I’m ok with them losing out. It is long over-due...


53 posted on 02/18/2022 9:38:20 AM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Just use the old suits, they worked.


54 posted on 02/18/2022 9:38:47 AM PST by Captain Peter Blood (https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3804407/posts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rx

Good post—NASA is the “dog ate my homework” agency.

Their expertise is making excuses for failure.


55 posted on 02/18/2022 9:39:01 AM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

https://www.aulis.com/suits.htm


56 posted on 02/18/2022 9:40:31 AM PST by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Yes... but 90% of your ROI on mining those resources will come in off-Terra utilization. There isn’t a need to drop them back down the gravity well.


57 posted on 02/18/2022 9:43:20 AM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

At his latest Starship presentation, SpaceX CEO Musk highlighted the fact that Starship will be reusable over and over again at a fraction of the cost of previous rockets.


Tower is every bit as complex as the booster or the Starship. The tower will catch the booster, and then capture the Starship, mate the two after inspection and then refuel, and relaunch. The entire process should take about 3 hours from initial launch to next launch; there will be multiple launches per day. The higher the rate, the lower the cost of the launch price.

Basically, the Starship can take cargo or people from any one point on Earth to any other point in 1 hour.

Starship will mate with tanker in orbit side to side or vertically, if you will and “refill, not refuel”, said Elon.

That’s why NASA is Sh*tting The Bed”


58 posted on 02/18/2022 9:44:44 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

lol


59 posted on 02/18/2022 9:46:49 AM PST by dinodino ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"The SLS should be flat-out cancelled as soon as Starship does its first orbital launch, which may be as early as next month"

Argh, no. You keep that government teat pipeline WIDE open, because if you even ATTEMPT to CLOSE it, every last one of these groups and their bought-and-paid-for Congressional-delegations will bind together to take down Musk and SpaceX. I absolutely guarantee it.

Marshall, Stennis, Promontory, Cudahy, all of the avionics subsytem builders.

Northrop Grummn, Aerojet, Dynetics, ATK, Ball, Pratt (Rocketdyne), ATA, and Boeing.

As long as they get their grift, Musk gets free reign to get Starship into orbit around the Moon and then around Mars.

The SLS booby prize is who knows, maybe it can be used for emergencies. Or maybe take Democrats to the Sun.

60 posted on 02/18/2022 9:51:42 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Each of you have at least 1 of these in your 401k: Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, J&J, Merck and GSK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson