| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 02/16/2022 7:45:43 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Search still works |
Posted on 02/16/2022 5:11:15 AM PST by BurgessKoch
Once again, we see the conservative pundit class go bananas over the new motion filings from the Durham investigation in the last few days. Suddenly, everybody at Fox News is “expecting more indictments” at any moment! (How did that turn out for Sean Hannity and Dan Bongino the last time?) Suddenly, everybody is supposed to be excited that Durham’s crack team finally figured out spying activities against Donald Trump that occurred in July 2016.
This is a mistake.
The first question you should be asking yourself is why it took the Justice Department almost 6 years to figure out those spying activities.
Let me use the proper analogy here. It’s like going back to your old ex-boyfriend who never treated you well because he called you once over the holidays. You know that it’s going to end badly before you even call him back — but you’re lonely and you can’t help yourself. It’s a troubled and abusive relationship — the one between FBI Special Counsel John Durham and American voters who want justice for the Russia Hoax. I don’t want to see you get your feelings hurt.
Let me explain why you’re probably being played again.
(Excerpt) Read more at emeralddb3.substack.com ...
Destroying evidence and creating new evidence for the chumps who will take the fall and be pardoned by Child Sniffing Joe.
Robinson is likely right in large part, but IMHO she fails to accord proper import to the delaying actions by the treason brokers. Democrat lawyers garner massive fees for a reason in these political wars.
Death is irrevocable
Why it took the Justice Department almost 6 years to figure out those spying activities.......had to take that time for the Obama/Biden coup to get off the ground and then settled in Office.
Further until the other mainstream media pick up on the story then it’s not happening.
I think Hillary likes the attention...good and bad....as it keeps her significant in her eyes and she likes to rumble.
In 2020, look at what the Dem operatives did for Biden - (cue the ‘F’raud graphic).
Then recall that in 2016, they did NOT do this for Hillary.
She has a lot of blackmail on a lot of people, but I think that even some of her own don’t want her.
A win is a win. Remember if it is the deep state taking her down there’s going to be a lot of collateral damage to them.
My own theory is simple: Durham exists so that the FBI can regain some credit with the American public (“hey, those Clinton people lied to us!”) while directing the media narrative away from Obama. You already see this misdirection in the corporate media headlines this week: Hillary did it. Durham exists, in other words, as a kind of insurance policy against the ambitions of the Clintons. His real goal is keep his investigation afloat through 2024. That would explain his slow, slow, slow progress. If Hillary Clinton suddenly decides to run in a primary against Biden/Harris for the 2024 ticket, then Lady Macbeth and her old campaign staff (Sussmann, Elias, Sullivan and the rest of them) will find themselves in very hot water.
Not losing is the win
Saying the words “Durham’s crack team.”
I have visions of the cleanup crew monitoring Hunter Biden.
The first question I asked myself was how Durham’s investigation is still operating when I saw the first snippet after Joe & the Hoe’s ascension. The 2nd question was the same after the most recent leaks. I literally wondered aloud just yesterday about the origin of his investigation’s funding.
2nd only to the other question which was how Durham either didn’t have an accident or some other medical emergency by now.
Something smells, but I can’t put my finger on it.
In everybody’s perfect world. A win is not losing.
She’s right.
I have a better reason why.
The democommies are going to remove the clintons from power.
And this is the best way to do it.
That was the conclusion of the author of the article (Emerald Robinson).
.
Well, as per FR tradition, I did not read the article... LOL
John Durham was appointed Special Counsel in December 2020, a little over a year ago. No doubt he has been opposed and resisted at every step of the way by Clinton forces and an unsympathetic DoJ led by a corrupt AG.
It may be premature to discount his efforts, especially given his fingering of Sussman, lead counsel for the whole Clinton Campaign— hardly a little fish. If he was just killing time there wouldn’t be the fierce attacks against him almost instantaneously from the brothel media.
Such a wonderful story it was worth posting again eh? Or is it you just can get enough cynicism in your diet?
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4038735/posts
If he hires Prince Reibus (former RNC chairman) again, it will show he hasn’t learned his lesson of fully vetting his picks. This doofus is a RINO and the idea Trump thought he could trust him and publicly bragging about him makes him seem clueless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.