Official U.K. Lab Report confirms Covid-19 Vaccines definitely contain Graphene Oxide

dailyexpose.uk ^ | FEBRUARY 13, 2022 | PATRICIA HARRITY

[ransomnote]

The Covid-19 vaccines have been forensically examined in the United Kingdom and a laboratory report confirms they contain graphene nanomaterials that can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and damage the central nervous system, and Graphene Oxide which can damage internal organs, destroy blood health, trigger cancer, and cause changes in gene function among a host of other ill effects.

Following her own experience with patients who had suffered apparent vaccine injury and adverse reactions, a British Medical Practitioner came forward in December 2021 offering to assist in an investigation to ascertain whether the results discovered by Dr’s Noack and Campra could be replicated in the UK and also to examine the COVID-19 injection vials for discovery of toxins or unexpected contents.

The medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery in which she works and handed it to an independent investigator assisting in investigating cases relating to injury sustained as a result of injections given as part of the roll out.

Further vials have since been obtained which cover the three main manufacturers in the UK: Pfizer,
Moderna and AstraZeneca.

The contents of the injection vials have been forensically examined and a laboratory report has now been officially published.

The report titled “Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines” has been presented to the Police involved in the UK Criminal Case, 6029679/21, which is said to provide them with more than enough reasonable suspicion that serious indictable offences have been committed regarding the administration of experimental treatments.

The report contains the toxicology reports of injection vials that have been forensically examined, with findings that provide “more than enough grounds” for the Police to apply for the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Warrant and seize injection vials for themselves.

The Police will then be able to submit them to a Home Office Laboratory with a view to replicate the findings and will enable them to possess their own hard evidence to support serious indictable offences.

Additionally, the police, in line with the duty of care to the public, have been asked to request the immediate cessation of the experimental treatment rollout.

The Report: Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines – by UNIT

Four vaccine vials were the subject of the investigation.

Two Moderna samples, and 1 AstraZeneca, and 1 Pfizer sample were collected for examination in order to analyse the contents and identify if undeclared components were present in them.

Here is the list of declared ingredients in each vaccine by the manufacturers –

The inclusions that are not declared by the manufacturers were the focus for this particular analysis, primarily graphene and carbon-related nanostructures in form of carbon or graphene composites, graphene in association with polyethylene glycol, graphene oxide, iron oxide compounds, and calcite.

The Four Vials

The analysis of all four vial contents identified objects that are similar and have been defined and illustrated within the report individually.

The Identified inclusions were:

1. Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol
2. Graphene Composite Form 1.
3. Graphene Composite Form 2.
4. Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions.
5. Graphene Nano Form with and without fluorescence
6. Graphene nano objects
7. Graphene nano scrolls

Moderna 01

The first sample that was evaluated was the Moderna 01 which was examined by Raman spectroscopy. The investigation clearly showed that all the inclusions within the vaccine have a strong carbon signal with confirmed graphene compositions of some representative forms.

Two clear signals were obtained from two objects. The flat ribbon-like inclusions exhibited clear graphene spectra integrated with the spectrum of glycol and other minor compounds. The other clear signal was obtained from a calcite microcrystalline form and Carbon composite forms also had a clear graphene signal.

It is important to point out that some nano amorphous carbon forms showed a clear Graphene signal, however, these forms also exhibited fluorescence which masked the Graphene peak.

Moderna 02

Particles that carry the mRNA load were clearly seen and Graphene composite 01 was prominently present even at low resolution and Graphene Nano objects were present in “great abundance.” within the vial sample.

AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca was the third vaccine that was evaluated for its inclusion, and as it was almost transparent it made “spotting of inherent colours slightly easier”. Under wet microscopic observation, the solution exhibited instantaneous movement of nanoscopic particulate material which when observed closely seemed to be driven by convection current.

When dry, the particles exhibited traction movement. In figure, 3.21. the microscopic form is clearly visible as it is lying on top of the solid film while the nanoparticles are still in motion in the background as can be seen by the shifting position of the shadow. A clear output of this mechanism was that as the medium solidified, it became more difficult for the nanoparticles to navigate through the viscous material.

Confirmed inclusions within AstraZeneca were of the presence of Graphene in all the identified representative forms. The carbon composites are of two forms as they are in the Moderna vaccines. These two forms showed distinct graphene signatures. Also, besides Graphene the spectrum is dominated by iron oxide and other forms of carbon associations.

Pfizer

Pfizer was the fourth vaccine vial that was evaluated for its inclusions. The pipette specimen showed some extremely interesting inclusions. As the material was sucked into the pipette, distinct translucent to transparent sheets were seen floating about as seen in figure 3.28.

Three of these samples showed carbon composite signatures with possible graphene in. The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them. 

Ribbon forms of nearly transparent microforms are found in fair numbers in the slide. These are often half embedded in the solution with one end projecting outside the material. The carbon composites of both form 1 and 2 also are present in great numbers. Form 1 settles on top of the material while form 2 is found at mid-levels of the solidified medium. Graphene nanoforms are present in fair numbers within the slide material along with some scrolls. Figure 3.32. Representative inclusions found within Pfizer vaccine.

The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them. The graphene complex 1 is graphene with polyethylene glycol signal forming the bulk of the spectrum. Though, for initial assessments, this study can confirm the presence of graphene in Pfizer.

Notably, one of the samples that was shot, displayed a fair influence of fluorescence.

To Conclude

All three vaccines commonly employ the self-assembling lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery mechanisms. Where the central find of this project has been the confirmation of the presence of graphene in all four samples, it is important to evaluate this find in the context of the subject itself.

It is also important to mention, that the source of fluorescence within the samples was unknown while the investigations were underway, and due to tight timescales were not able to be investigated at the time.

An Open Access review highlighting the toxicity of the graphene family nanoparticles can be viewed here.

Source

In conclusion, it can be stated that the four samples of vaccines (Moderna 1, Modern 2, AstraZeneca, Pfizer) all contain significant amount of carbon composites, graphene compounds, and iron oxide.

These ingredients were undeclared by the manufacturers and are absent from the list of ingredients for the vaccines. However, studies show how dangerous the Graphene family is, yet individuals have not been made aware that they are being injected with the deadly substance.

The lab report can be read in full here.

 

[MountainDad]

this is gonna give gassy the vapors

Yeah. That scum is an elitist a$$hole who is probably being paid by big pharma....

[wgmalabama]

Exactly what does their adenovirus deliver? Pixie dust? Same with J&J. Both use an Adenovirus to deliver the mRNA code. Different methods but the result is the same. You turn into an (S1 andS2) full spike protein generator. How do you think it works?

[gas_dr]

It is always nice to see someone spew crap when they have no brain. Try real analysis, but I suppose you are incapable of it. It is obvious you are known by the company you keep. You seem to be in the company of someone who repeatedly violates the rules of free republic.

[logi_cal869]

Not unlike some of us here knew would be validated.

Clearly this article was written by someone else (as opposed to the AIDS one).

Thanks for posting!

[neverevergiveup]

Sorry. I didn't read thoroughly and didn't know they were referring specifically to the Astra Zeneca adeno-based vaccine. You can use magnetic concentration methods for adenovirus vectors also, but I'm not sure they used this or cesium chloride ultracentrifugation etc. in their manufacturing.

[Jane Long]

“Wild conspiracy theories” become truth almost always these days.

---

Yep.

See my (not new!) tagline.

[logi_cal869]

Summation:

“Poison.”

[MountainDad]

See what I mean...? Read the comment well. You will see.

Elitist A$$hole!!!!!

[mvonfr]

Having exact the same glitch in two products based on different technologies raises a question, I think.

(Moderna and Pfizer products may be variations of exact the same development and manufacturing, so same glitch may occur and just be a glitch.)

[A strike]

Where oh where has gas.dr gone,
where, oh where can he be ?

[A strike]

DugwayDuke too

[2CAVTrooper]

I say inject Bill Gates and the other globalists with this crap.

[SheepWhisperer]

Of course =o)

Bona fide is an interesting key.
... Even attorneys are smart enough not to give unsolicited counsel.

Not so with gassyy

::quack::

[SheepWhisperer]

He’s invisible...like methane

[gas_dr]

I take it as a high honor that I have gained a series of stalkers, especially from the one who like to talk to ewe. As for the source — its funny, this is the same poster who tried to post a grand jury testimony from the peoples court of public opinion — the desperation rises. And upthread, I have another stalker who is threatening me.

The more unhinged they become, the funnier it is.

[gas_dr]

I am right here, laughing at the insanity of the sources, and enjoying being called names and maligned by the usual conga line of acolytes who believe these sources . Thank you for asking. I am well. I hope you are well this evening, too.

[A strike]

Yep, I’m sure you’ll be denying vaxx deadly results proof years from now.

I’m well and also wishing that for you.

[wgmalabama]

It’s such a funny topic. Complete liberty / freedom takeover by federal / state executives, bureaucrats …. Forced / coercion of unapproved medical treatment. Unwilling to follow established protocols of safety warnings …

Freaking hysterical. Even if I was pro vax vs risk, I would never presume people’s concerns were not real, the seeking truth was insanity, that my decisions override theirs. Some on this site don’t so much subscribe to the notion of a free republic but more a power, money, intellectual oligarchy.

Laugh it up. I find it all so very sad. Personally, I can’t / haven’t made any medium financial decisions for 6 months now since I am constantly being threatened with termination over a disease that I have natural immunity, that has 99.9% survival rate, and the vax has not been safety tested agains my particular health concerns. Yet the CDC, FDA, NIH, medical manufacturing companies don’t care and just say it’s safe.

So laugh it up while you take everyone’s concerns with a grain of salt. You two have no clue what some of us have to endure week in and week out over a freaking con game.

[A strike]

“...The one who likes to talk over ewe. “

Is that like talk over sheeple?

[gas_dr]

I do not think the vaccine is a panacea, but I also do not think that there is the increasingly strange comments from websites that tend not to offer a fair look at things.

I mean this very sincerely, can we find a middle ground? As I have frequently said, I abhor mandates, and do not support anything that violates patient choice. As a HCW, I am vaccinated by choice, but I hate the USSC rolling that we can be compelled against our will to be vaccinated or lose our livelihood. I am glad they excluded everyone else from the draconian measures.

I agree there is medical tyranny and I fight against, but with a perspective of someone who practices. My record is pretty clear and hopefully consistent. However, being called everything under the sun from a murderer to Mengele is completely inappropriate.

Thanks for taking a moment to consider may comment.