Ok - so why did they take pictures?
Why did they come back and question/intimidate his staff?
Was he lying about that?
So now the Congress itself reports to the Capitol police which is rapidly morphing into yet another secret police agency.
When do they assert the right to decide who can and can’t be in the Congress?
Why were they dressed as construction workers?
So...what is their explanation for their “officer” being dressed as a construction worker?
Exactly...if they are going to play that game then Pelosi’s lectern walked off on Jan 6 because she failed to secure it.
“Security checks” do not require costumes or photos of public servants’ whiteboards and documents.
Manger said. “The weekend before Thanksgiving, one of our vigilant officers spotted the congressman’s door was wide open.”
Notice the superfluous adjective, “vigilant”.
Sign of propaganda.
notice the way the Washington Compost quickly comes to the Capitol Police’s defense..gee its almost like the Capitol Police goons and the commies are on the same page
Weren’t the Doors open on January 6?
Lets see some video tape. I’m sure the building has cameras in the hallways.
Door left wide open. Maybe the person who caught them was just working.
Walked in, dressed as the Village People.
The US Capitol Police are Pelosi’s Gestapo. They should be treated as the enemy.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? is a Latin phrase penned by the Roman poet Juvenal from his Satires (Satire vi, lines 347–348). It translates as “Who will guard the guards themselves?” In this article we look at “Who polices the police?”
IOW, nothing to see here, move along.
What is the difference between this and Watergate?
Besides it not being the president or republicans?
If the capital police are using the WP to defend them then I think that about says it all.
“Without evidence.”
In the Department of State, if a secure area is left open or unattended during non-duty hours, the Marine Security Guards get to throw their hat into the room, lock the door, and report the security violation.
There is no reason for someone to take pictures of data with a personal device, and if someone does take pictures that is illegal because it is a personal device. Heck, it it illegal to take pictures in the secure ares of the embassy where the Hat does the trick, e.g., the IPC.