[ransomnote]

PING

[SaxxonWoods]

If the information is from the CDC and VAERS, one or both them should be the link, not some second-hand BS.

[Grampa Dave]

There were warnings about the potential of clots post vaccination at the git go.

My wife and I are in our 80’s.

I was on Eliquis a blood thinner due to having a stent installed and a daily baby aspirin. Both my cardio doc, stent doc and primary care Doc told me not to DC the Eliquis or Baby Aspirin before or after the injection of the vaccine.

My wife was told by her family doc to continue taking her baby aspirin before and after her vaccinations.

We got our Pfizer shots on 01/31/21 and 2/21/21.

One of our shots came from a potentially dangerous batch #.

So, some medical people were aware of the potential of clots post vaccination.

[Its All Over Except ...]

The Daily Sceptic

A study published this week in JAMA finds the risk of myocarditis increased up to 133-fold following Covid vaccination, raising serious questions of vaccine safety, especially for young males.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LD_Sceptics/status/1486410142413381641

More:

Myocarditis Risk Increases Up To 133-FOLD Following Covid Vaccination, Study Finds

A study published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has found that the risk of myocarditis (heart inflammation) after receiving an mRNA Covid vaccine (Pfizer or Moderna) was dramatically increased across many age groups and was highest after the second vaccination dose in young men.

The study found myocarditis reports were highest after the second vaccination dose in males aged 12 to 15 years at 70.7 per million Pfizer doses, compared to an expected rate of 0.53 per million, amounting to a 133-fold increase; in males aged 16 to 17 years at 105.9 per million Pfizer doses, compared to an expected rate of 1.34 per million, amounting to a 79-fold increase; and in young men aged 18 to 24 years at 52.4 per million Pfizer doses and 56.3 per million Moderna doses, compared to an expected rate of 1.76 per million, amounting to a 30-fold and 32-fold increase respectively. The full results are shown in the table below and a selection are depicted in the chart above. ...

[TheDon]

So “clot shot”.

[Steve_Seattle]

The box with the largest number - 20,277 - has no description. What does that number represent.

[Steve_Seattle]

I don’t understand the 99.91% claim. There are more than 1,000 entries for the non-Covid vaccines, so the percentage should be about 95% (approx. 19,739/20,749), not 99.91%. That’s still a huge percentage, but not what the chart claims.

[bray]

Other than strokes and death it is perfectly safe.

[Arcadian Empire]

The CDC and the FDA are the property of Big Pharma.

[Robert DeLong]

Where are you getting this table from:

'

I know the source is: https://i.imgur.com/2iQ1CRG.png

But when I calculate the percentage of 19,739 (Covid-19) to total 20,277, I get the Covid-19 percentage as being 97.35% not 99.91.

When I add up the percentages for all following Covid-19, and use the percentage I get for Covid-19 (97.35%), I come close to the 102.64 listed, but I get 102.77

When I add up the counts for all vaccines listed, I get 20,801, not 20,277, which is a difference of 524.

When I count up all the other vaccine numbers and leave of Covid19, I get a count of 1,062 + 19,739 = 20,801. Which is again is not 20,277.

Does the Covid-19 number represent that the patient received just the Covid-19 vaccine, or are the mixture of the Covid-19 + whatever other vaccine they were receiving also, included?

Regardless, I cannot match up numbers to the total number of 20,277.

Can you explain these discrepancies? Perhaps I am doing something wrong on reading the data wrong.

Also what is the 41,078 total number listed, and its corresponding percentage of 207.93% actually representing?