If the information is from the CDC and VAERS, one or both them should be the link, not some second-hand BS.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Of the 19,756 cases in VAERS where a patient's symptom is blood clots, only 17 (.09 of one percent) cases published to VAERS were NOT 'vaccinated' with the Covid 'vaccine'., SaxxonWoods wrote: |
If the information is from the CDC and VAERS, one or both them should be the link, not some second-hand BS. |
Your first and only instinct is to attack to try to discredit VAERS data, but the data I posted is accurate and published to VAERS. You can extract patient IDs in this database and compare it to the VAERS database and get the same patient records because they use the same data set..
The CDC releases the VAERS dataset weekly, and organizations/researchers and others then use that dataset in their own programs, or simple applications like Excel, to analyze the data.
This website, medalerts.org picks up the CDC's VAERS data releases and makes it available to the public. This is done because VAERS is intentionally ridiculous - with fuzzy logic and data display limitations that make no sense (e.g., your search returned 39 thousand records, but VAERS can only display results for 10 thousand, so you're told to break the data into pieces (e.g., separate reports for men and women, or separate reports for various age groups), export it and then put it back together in the down stream application.
This data I posted accurately reflects VAERS data.