Posted on 02/03/2022 12:53:44 PM PST by ransomnote
And?
Is that somehow supposed to show that increased miscarriage is not happening among vaxxed women?
My post was responding to the original poster, who claimed that ALL pregnant women who were vaccinated miscarried. This is known to me to be false.
There are two large databases, one in Israel and one in Norway, that show SAB rates equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Third trimester women are at greatly increased risk of severe morbidity from COVID.
But my post was simply to refute the claim that ALL pregnant women miscarried. This is simply not true.
You are wrong, again. I want you to SKIP the jabs. So that we can donate your vaccine quota to poorer countries.
...except...23 out of 270 are reported, by THEIR OWN STUDIES as miscarriages...that’s near 10%.
Isn’t that alone bad enough to get heads screwed on straight?
I guess not.
Remember...ALL previous vaccine trials ceased at 50 deaths. YET...these pharmaceutical companies reported IN THEIR OWN STUDIES TO HAVE 1200 deaths in the first few months.
...and...AND... we’re missing the data on 243 of the pregnancies. Could be much much worse.
Kinda makes ya wonder why the harmaceutical companies don’t want to release the trial data for 75 years, long after were gone?
Amazing how very basic numbers, math and simple logic escapes the brainwashed. Some people will NEVER wake upand it’s sad.
..that is all
...ergo...kill the messenger is the only option!
I’m sorry, that’s terrible. Did she attribute it to the vaccine?
I certainly don’t think the vax is a death jab for everyone, even for unborn children. What I do think, however, is that the occurrences of such are abnormal - abnormal to the extent that in a proper FDA approval test over years would result in a kickback of the vax tests and a complete rework. That’s why I think the attempts to hide all this approval data dragged out over 75 years is so important to unravel. I think there has been some seriously criminal actions going on with it.
So what, in your high and mighty esteem, is the acceptable percentage of deformed babies in medical experimental injections is suitable for your eugenics minds?
...and would you knowingly subject your children to that suitable risk.
...nobody cares until it’s THEIR OX being gored
Thalidomide’s approval was prevented in the U.S. by one woman:Frances Oldham Kelsey.
Except for the fact that we've had hundreds of thousands and probably millions of successful births by vaccinated women.
Talk about your inconvenient truths.
As if truth and Daily Expose could coexist on the same thread.
No, the doctors did not.
I don’t think they have either. At least they didn’t mention it to me.
Explosive info.
I think you must have misunderstood my post. Or maybe it was misdirected.
Re: 38 - The “Daily Expose” is known for click bait headlines. They’re hack journalists that have pushed many headlines that are clearly incorrect in order to generate page views.
So....they are exactly like the MSM. And the CDC...
Well, not quite like the MSM. At least the MSM lists the name of the story authors. The “Daily Expose” rarely if ever lists the name of story authors. That’s relevant when the story is of dubious accuracy.
I may have.
Pardon me
Yes, exactly like the MSM. The MSM is just one "anonymous source" after another, and of dubious accuracy.
The devil is in the details.
Based on the evidence outlined above, most authorities agree that pregnant women [42] should be included in the priority populations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination [53]. Although safety data are rapidly accumulating in pregnancy registries for a small number of widely deployed vaccines [54] and that several studies of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine use in pregnancy are on-going, we are not aware of any human trials that have demonstrated fetal and neonatal safety with any COVID-19 vaccines. The data currently available from animal developmental and reproductive toxicity studies are also very limited but have not suggested any safety concerns with regards to female fertility, fetal, embryonal, or postnatal development [13,32].
The bold is my addition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.